Literature DB >> 29034016

Improved Outcomes for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Integrated Management Involving Endovascular Clamping, Endovascular Replacement, and Open Abdominal Decompression.

Chikashi Aoki1, Norihiro Kondo1, Yoshiaki Saito1, Satoshi Taniguchi1, Wakako Fukuda1, Kazuyuki Daitoku1, Ikuo Fukuda1.   

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular repair has become the treatment of choice for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs). To improve surgical outcomes, preoperative management is important. In 2011, we introduced integrated management, which involves endovascular aneurysm repair, stabilization of hemodynamics by endovascular clamping, and open abdominal decompression to address abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
Methods: To evaluate the efficacy of this management strategy, 62 patients who had undergone emergency surgery for an RAAA were analyzed retrospectively: group A (n=39), where an old strategy was used, and group B (n=23), where integrated management was introduced. Patient characteristics and 30-day mortality rates were compared between the two groups.
Results: The average patient age was 67.7 years and 74.7 years for groups A and B, respectively (P=0.032). Group B patients required more frequent use of vasopressors (P=0.035). Other patient characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group B than in group A (P=0.001). The total amount of transfused blood did not differ between the two groups. No patients showed symptoms of ACS. Early mortality rates were 12.8% and 8.7% in groups A and B, respectively. The number of wound infections was significantly fewer in group B than in group A.
Conclusion: Although group B patients were significantly older and had a higher rate of vasopressor use, early mortality was improved in both groups. Morbidity was significantly better in group B with respect to the duration of surgery and number of wound infections than in group A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EVAR; abdominal compartment syndrome; endovascular clamp; ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; shock

Year:  2017        PMID: 29034016      PMCID: PMC5579800          DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  17 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M J Bown; A J Sutton; P R F Bell; R D Sayers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jorik J Reimerink; Liselot L Hoornweg; Anco C Vahl; Willem Wisselink; Ted A A van den Broek; Dink A Legemate; Jim A Reekers; Ron Balm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Fate of patients unwilling or unsuitable to undergo surgical intervention for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  S C van Beek; A C Vahl; W Wisselink; R Balm
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  The impact of hemodynamic status on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair for rupture.

Authors:  Manish Mehta; Philip S K Paty; John Byrne; Sean P Roddy; John B Taggert; Yaron Sternbach; Kathleen J Ozsvath; R Clement Darling
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Abdominal compartment syndrome associated with endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Chen Rubenstein; Gabriel Bietz; Daniel L Davenport; Michael Winkler; Eric D Endean
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Initial experience with transluminally placed endovascular grafts for the treatment of complex vascular lesions.

Authors:  M L Marin; F J Veith; J Cynamon; L A Sanchez; R T Lyon; B A Levine; C W Bakal; W D Suggs; K R Wengerter; S P Rivers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: who should be offered surgery?

Authors:  D T Hardman; C M Fisher; M I Patel; M Neale; J Chambers; R Lane; M Appleberg
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Prateek K Gupta; Bala Ramanan; Travis L Engelbert; Girma Tefera; John R Hoch; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial.

Authors:  Janet T Powell; Michael J Sweeting; Matthew M Thompson; Ray Ashleigh; Rachel Bell; Manuel Gomes; Roger M Greenhalgh; Richard Grieve; Francine Heatley; Robert J Hinchliffe; Simon G Thompson; Pinar Ulug
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-13

Review 10.  Current status of endovascular devices to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Kamell Eckroth-Bernard; Robert Garvin; Evan Ryer
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2013-04-10
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Konstantinos Tzirakis; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.