| Literature DB >> 29033844 |
Fabrício A Voltarelli1,2, Fernando T Frajacomo1,3, Camila de Souza Padilha1, Mayra T J Testa1, Paola S Cella1, Diogo F Ribeiro1, Donizete X de Oliveira1, Luciana C Veronez4, Gabriela S Bisson4, Felipe A Moura1, Rafael Deminice1.
Abstract
Muscle wasting has been emerging as one of the principal components of cancer cachexia, leading to progressive impairment of work capacity. Despite early stages melanomas rarely promotes weight loss, the appearance of metastatic and/or solid tumor melanoma can leads to cachexia development. Here, we investigated the B16F10 tumor-induced cachexia and its contribution to muscle strength and locomotor-like activity impairment. C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously injected with 5 × 104 B16F10 melanoma cells or PBS as a Sham negative control. Tumor growth was monitored during a period of 28 days. Compared to Sham mice, tumor group depicts a loss of skeletal muscle, as well as significantly reduced muscle grip strength and epididymal fat mass. This data are in agreement with mild to severe catabolic host response promoted by elevated serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Tumor implantation has also compromised general locomotor activity and decreased exploratory behavior. Likewise, muscle loss, and elevated inflammatory interleukin were associated to muscle strength loss and locomotor activity impairment. In conclusion, our data demonstrated that subcutaneous B16F10 melanoma tumor-driven catabolic state in response to a pro-inflammatory environment that is associated with impaired skeletal muscle strength and decreased locomotor activity in tumor-bearing mice.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; general locomotor activity; inflammation; melanoma; muscle strength
Year: 2017 PMID: 29033844 PMCID: PMC5626871 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Tumor volume (A) and food intake (B) over the 4 weeks after tumor cell inoculation for sham (n = 8) and tumor (n = 8) groups. Values are mean ± SD. *Indicates significant difference from S group; $Indicate significant difference from week 1 (P < 0.05 by ANOVA 2-way for two independent samples).
Initial body mass, tumor-free body mass, relative weights of the liver, muscle, epididymal fat pads and tumor mass, as well as cachexia index determined for tumor-bearing and Sham mice.
| Initial body mass (g) | 20.6 ± 0.8 | 20.0 ± 1.1 | 0.74 |
| Tumor-free body mass (g) | 21.2 ± 0.8 | 19.9 ± 1.91 | 0.07 |
| Liver (%/body weight) | 5.00 ± 0.72 | 5.25 ± 0.65 | 0.40 |
| ∑ muscle weigh (%/body weight) | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.46 ± 0.11* | 0.02 |
| Spleen (%/body weight) | 0.97 ± 0.11 | 2.23 ± 0.56 | 0.00 |
| Epididymal fat (%/body weight) | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 0.79 ± 0.03* | 0.01 |
| Tumor mass (%/body weight) | - | 14.55 ± 9.92 | - |
| Cachexia index (%) | - | 8.34 ± 3.81 | - |
Values expressed as mean ± SD. Data evaluated by T-test for independent samples; adopted value of significance of P < 0.05.
Figure 2Plasma enzymatic activities of LDH (A) and plasma concentrations of IL-6 (B), IL-10 (C), TNF-α (D) for sham (n = 6) and tumor (n = 6) groups. Values are mean ± SD. *Indicates significant difference from S group (P < 0.05 by t-test for independent samples).
Figure 3Representative figure of the lomocotion test (A); total traveled distance (B); traveled distance in center (C); stopped time (D); and muscle gripping strength (E) for sham (n = 8) and tumor (n = 8) groups. Values are mean ± SD. *Indicates significant difference from S group (P < 0.05 by t-test for independent samples).
Figure 4Correlation between muscle gripping strength with skeletal muscle mass (A), total body weight (B) and plasma TNF-α (C). Correlation was also determined between skeletal muscle mass and traveled distance in center at locomotor test (D), and with total traveled distance at locomotor test with Plasma TNF- α (E) and IL-6 (F) for sham (•) and tumor (▴) groups.