Literature DB >> 29033412

Emergency Caesarean Section Saved Both an Anti-MuSK Antibody-positive Myasthenia Gravis Mother with Pregnancy-induced Hypertension and Her Premature Baby.

Yoshiaki Takahashi1, Toru Yamashita1, Ryuta Morihara1, Yumiko Nakano1, Kota Sato1, Mami Takemoto1, Nozomi Hishikawa1, Yasuyuki Ohta1, Kei Hayata2, Hisashi Masuyama2, Tomoka Okamura3, Yosuke Washio3, Koji Abe1.   

Abstract

We herein report the case of a 46-year-old pregnant woman with anti-muscle specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) who showed pregnancy-induced hypertension and developed respiratory failure at 30 weeks and 5 days of pregnancy, and who underwent an emergency caesarean section (CS). Her MG symptoms gradually improved in the subsequent weeks. The premature baby with positive MuSK antibodies was successfully delivered, but the male baby required temporary artificial ventilation. However, his condition also gradually improved over time. The present case suggests that an emergency CS could rescue both the mother, who was in critical condition, and the prematurely born baby, even when suffering from acute respiratory insufficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-MuSK antibody; emergency caesarean section; myasthenia gravis; pregnancy-induced hypertension; premature baby

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29033412      PMCID: PMC5790728          DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8636-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med        ISSN: 0918-2918            Impact factor:   1.271


Introduction

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. Among the patients with MG, but without anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies, anti-muscle specific kinase (MuSK) antibodies are detected in 30-40% of all cases (1-3). Bulbar symptoms have been reported to be most commonly observed in anti-MuSK antibody-positive MG (MuSK-MG) individuals who cannot be medically treated (4). MuSK-MG has a higher prevalence in females in their twenties and thirties (5,6). In maternal MG, medical care is often difficult because the clinical course of the disease during pregnancy can be unpredictable, and such newly born infants may develop transient neonatal myasthenia gravis (NMG) (7,8). Several cases of pregnant MuSK-MG mothers who underwent a scheduled caesarean section (CS) have been reported (9-12). We herein describe, for the first time, an emergency CS case in which both the MuSK-MG mother, who had developed respiratory failure, and her prematurely born baby, were successfully treated and survived.

Case Report

A 43-year-old woman occasionally noticed double vision and bilateral eyelid ptosis, but otherwise had no particular past medical or familial history. She was diagnosed with dysarthria and dysphagia at 44 years of age. She became pregnant for the first time when she was 46, but was admitted to her previous hospital due to a worsening of dysarthria and dysphagia at 20 weeks (w) of pregnancy. A blood examination showed her to be anti-AChR antibody-negative but anti-MuSK antibody-positive, so she was referred to our clinic with suspected MG at 23 w of pregnancy. After undergoing neurological examinations, she presented with bilateral eyelid ptosis, bilateral upper gaze limitation, double vision in all directions, mild facial weakness, dysarthria, dysphagia and muscle weakness in neck flexion. Repetitive nerve stimulation of the facial nerve with 3 Hz showed 32 % waning. She showed a slight decrease in her vital capacity to 82 % with arterial blood gas (ABG) of pH 7.43, partial pressure oxygen (PO2) 97.9 mmHg, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2) 35.4 mmHg, bicarbonate (HCO3-) 23.3 mmol/L, and alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO2) 9.1, but no effort dyspnea or thymoma in the thoracic CT. An edrophonium test was not conducted to avoid a possible worsening of MG symptoms with anti-MuSK antibodies. She was diagnosed as MuSk-MG. Her dysarthria and dysphagia worsened while at home by 6 w, so she was admitted to our hospital at 29 w and 6 days (29 w 6 d) of pregnancy. However, her myasthenic symptoms, including easy fatigability, dysarthria, and dysphagia, gradually worsened even after admission, and she developed sinus tachycardia of 100-120/min, pregnancy-induced hypertension with a systolic blood pressure (sBP) to 170-190 mmHg, and positive urine protein (4+), all of which were poorly controlled by medications, such as hydralazine and methyldopa. Oral prednisolone was started from 10 mg/d, but she required tube feeding at 30 w 4 d. Finally, she displayed respiratory insufficiency with tachypnea (35-40/min), hypercapnia, and oxygen inhalation was initiated with 2 L/min by nasal cannula at 30 w 5 d of pregnancy (ABG was pH 7.38, PO2 135.7 mmHg, PCO2 46.3 mmHg, HCO3- 26.6 mmol/L, and AaDO2 13.2), leading to an emergency CS under spinal anesthesia (Figure). At 4 minutes from the start of the surgery, the baby (boy) was safely delivered, but with a very low body weight (1,456 g) and an apgar score of 4 (at 1 minute)/7 (at 5 minutes), and moderate suspended animation, which required the baby to receive tracheal intubation with artificial ventilation. An examination of the umbilical cord blood showed that anti-MuSK antibodies were positive (1.65 nmol/L; normal range 0-0.02 nmol/L).
Figure.

Hospital course and medication of the present case. CS: caesarean section, d: days, HR: heart rate, MG: myasthenia gravis, POD: post-operative day, RR: respiratory rate, sBP: systolic blood pressure, w: weeks

Hospital course and medication of the present case. CS: caesarean section, d: days, HR: heart rate, MG: myasthenia gravis, POD: post-operative day, RR: respiratory rate, sBP: systolic blood pressure, w: weeks The mother's dysarthria, eyelid ptosis and double vision worsened after the delivery, although her respiratory status improved as did her blood pressure (BP) and heart rate. She thus received plasma exchange (PE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on post-operative day (POD) 2, but she then became acutely hypotensive (BP 51/35 mmHg) and developed tachycardia (111/min) followed by anaphylactic shock which occurred 5 minutes after FFP administration. Thus, FFP administration was immediately stopped, and she was successfully resuscitated. Oral prednisolone treatment increased from 10 to 20 mg/d after POD6 (Figure). With this steroid and antihypertensive olmesartan, her MG symptoms and hypertension gradually improved. Her baby also recovered from respiratory failure, and underwent extubation on POD16 without any trouble. The mother was able to hold her baby for the first time on POD23, and she was discharged on POD32 while her baby was discharged on POD53. The anti-MuSK antibody levels in the serum of her baby decreased, as assessed by POD43, over the clinical course. Maternal anti-MuSK antibody titers remained high (Table 1).
Table 1.

The Titers of Anti-MuSK Antibodies (Cut-off Value <0.02 nmol/L) of Mother and Baby.

POD (day)-201814262943
Anti-MuSK antibodies (nmol/L)Mother4.885.32
Baby1.65*1.070.130.330.110.06

* Umbilical cord blood

The Titers of Anti-MuSK Antibodies (Cut-off Value <0.02 nmol/L) of Mother and Baby. * Umbilical cord blood

Discussion

This case report shows that an emergency CS was able to save both the critical MuSK-MG mother and her prematurely born baby. There are only six cases reported thus far of pregnant MuSK-MG, four of which were delivered by CS (9-12), while two were delivered vaginally (13,14). All six of those deliveries were performed at 34-38 w of pregnancy. In contrast, this is the first report of a successful emergency CS as early as 30 w with very low baby weight (1,456 g, Table 2).
Table 2.

Pregnant Patients with Anti-MuSK-mediated Myasthenia Gravis and Their Children.

Case NoAge at MG onset (years)Age at diagnosis of MuSK-MG (years)Age at pregnancy (years)Past pregnancyMG condition during pregnancyDeliveryAfter delivery MG conditionBaby after birth
AS (1m/5m) & WeightAnti-MuSK antibodySymptom & course
1 (13)1323242 miscarriageSteady38W1d Vaginal birthn.m.AS 10/10 3,190g+Initial dysphagia & hypotonia, normal development
2 (14)3839392 miscarriage (Gravida 3)Worsened at 15 & 19W34W4d Vaginal birth with PROMSteadyAS 9/10 2,360gn.e.Discharge on Day 2
3 (9)253234First baby, CS at age 25Steady37W6d Scheduled CSSteadyAS 7/9 2,558g+Initial dyspnea & from hypo to hypertonia of lower limbs
4 (10)222626Polyhydramnios at 33W38W Scheduled CSFacial weakness & bulbar palsy for 4MAS 8/8 2,950g+Ventilation for 39 d, hypotonia for 6M
5 (11)293030Miscarriage at 10 WPolyhydramnios & worsened state during the 2nd trimester34W Scheduled CSBulbar palsy, facial weakness, limbs weakness, dyspneaAS 3/6 n.m.n.e.PE on 11d, IVIg on 23 d, ventilation for 44 d, normal development
6 (12)303030Worsened at 8M PE on 37W1d37W6d Scheduled CSBulbar palsy at 2WAS 9/9 2,482g+Hypotonia, tube feeding for 14 d, normal development
Present case434646Worsened at 29 - 30W30W5d, Emergency CSInitial anaphylactic shock, MG symptom improvedAS 4/7 1,456g+Ventilator for 16 d, normal development

AS: Apgar score (at 1 min/at 5 min), CS: caesarean section, d: days, M: months, n.e.: not examined, n.m.: not mentioned, PE: plasma exchange, PROM: premature rupture of membranes, Ref: reference, W: weeks

Pregnant Patients with Anti-MuSK-mediated Myasthenia Gravis and Their Children. AS: Apgar score (at 1 min/at 5 min), CS: caesarean section, d: days, M: months, n.e.: not examined, n.m.: not mentioned, PE: plasma exchange, PROM: premature rupture of membranes, Ref: reference, W: weeks From a total of seven MuSK-MG patients, three experienced miscarriages in the past and four showed worsened MG symptoms during pregnancy (Table 2). The present case developed tachycardia, tachypnea, easy fatigability, dysarthria, dysphagia, and pregnancy-induced hypertension, even after admission. We thought that the mother's respiratory insufficiency had probably been caused by MG symptoms, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and fetal compression to the mother's diaphragm, leading her to need an emergency CS. Only a few hours after delivery, the mother's MG symptoms temporarily improved, most likely due to the release of fetal compression from her diaphragm. Although this mother initially showed worsening bulbar symptoms and anaphylactic shock after the emergency CS, she recovered safely from these fetal problems and her MG symptoms gradually improved (Figure). Among the seven recorded MuSK-MG-related deliveries, five babies were positive for anti-MuSK antibodies (two were not examined), five developed transient NMG, and three required artificial ventilation for 16-44 d (Table 2). Polyhydramnios is a sign of NMG (10,11). Two babies (Cases No. 4 and 5) with polyhydramnios showed more severe symptoms than the other babies (Table 2). Although the present case showed an upper limit volume of amniotic fluid at 25 w 6 d of pregnancy, the baby did not show any fetal abnormalities. The anti-MuSK antibodies of the present case decreased within the first month (Table 1). The present baby briefly showed mild generalized hypotonia, delayed gastrointestinal transit, and respiratory distress syndrome, which required tracheal intubation with artificial ventilation for 16 d. The present baby was delivered by emergency CS at 30 w 5 d of pregnancy. From this reason, it was difficult to determine whether his symptoms were caused by NMG or premature birth with the deficiency of pulmonary surfactant. However, these symptoms gradually improved within 44 d, and he developed normally after the delivery. The present case suggests that careful monitoring is required for MuSK-MG patients during pregnancy, and that an emergency CS can save the lives of both the mother and baby, even when suffering from acute respiratory insufficiency.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
  13 in total

1.  A transient neonatal myasthenic syndrome with anti-musk antibodies.

Authors:  E H Niks; A Verrips; B A Semmekrot; M J J Prick; A Vincent; M J D van Tol; C M Jol-van der Zijde; J J G M Verschuuren
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Anti-MuSK antibody myasthenia gravis: clinical findings and response to treatment in two large cohorts.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Guptill; Donald B Sanders; Amelia Evoli
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  [A pregnant patient with anti-MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis and her infant with transient neonatal myasthenia gravis].

Authors:  Akihiro Kanzaki; Masakatsu Motomura
Journal:  Rinsho Shinkeigaku       Date:  2011-03

Review 4.  Myasthenia gravis in mothers and their newborns.

Authors:  W C Plauché
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Response to therapy in myasthenia gravis with anti-MuSK antibodies.

Authors:  Amelia Evoli; Maria R Bianchi; Raffaella Riso; Giacomo M Minicuci; Anna P Batocchi; Serenella Servidei; Flavia Scuderi; Emanuela Bartoccioni
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Newborn infants to myasthenic mothers: a clinical study and an investigation of acetylcholine receptor antibodies in 17 children.

Authors:  A K Lefvert; P O Osterman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Clinical comparison of muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive and -negative myasthenic patients.

Authors:  Lan Zhou; John McConville; Vinay Chaudhry; Robert N Adams; Richard L Skolasky; Angela Vincent; Daniel B Drachman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Severe neonatal myasthenia due to maternal anti-MuSK antibodies.

Authors:  Anthony Béhin; Michèle Mayer; Bouchera Kassis-Makhoul; Myriam Jugie; Caroline Espil-Taris; Xavier Ferrer; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pascal Laforêt; Bruno Eymard
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.296

9.  Clinical aspects of MuSK antibody positive seronegative MG.

Authors:  D B Sanders; K El-Salem; J M Massey; J McConville; A Vincent
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  [Antibodies in myasthenia gravis].

Authors:  B Eymard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.