Literature DB >> 29033152

Intraoperative Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Pain Management in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Itay Perets1, John P Walsh1, Brian H Mu1, Leslie C Yuen1, Lyall Ashberg1, Muriel R Battaglia1, Benjamin G Domb2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain management after total hip arthroplasty is well studied. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the "cocktail" to use in periarticular infiltration (PAI). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a slow release local anesthetic that can be infiltrated during surgery. In this study, we compared LB to bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCL).
METHODS: Between September 2014 and March 2016, 181 patients were screened for this prospective randomized trial. A total of 107 patients were enrolled and studied. Patients were separated into LB and control groups. LB group (50) received PAI with LB and bupivacaine HCL with epinephrine and the control group (57) received PAI with bupivacaine HCL and epinephrine. Patient morphine equivalent consumption, pain score estimated on visual analog scale, time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, time to discharge, drug-related side effects, and patient falls were documented. Data were collected up to 72 hours postoperation.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in morphine equivalent consumption in any of the 12-hour time blocks, up to 72 hours. No patient falls were documented in either group. Time to first ambulation greater than 20 feet, ambulation same day as surgery, time to discharge, and drug-related side effects were not significantly different between groups. CONLCUSION: Intraoperative PAI with LB did not result in significant differences in postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, opioid-related side effects, time to first ambulation, and length of stay up to 72 hours following total hip arthroplasty compared to a control group.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lyposomal bupivacaine; pain management; pain scores; periarticular infiltration; prospective randomized trial; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29033152     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Pain Scores After THA Between Periarticular Analgesic Injection and Placebo: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Zachary D Post
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The role for high volume local infiltration analgesia with liposomal bupivacaine in total hip arthroplasty: A scoping review.

Authors:  Neeraj Vij; Rajesh Supra; Delena Vanvalkenburg; Nicholas Comardelle; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-05

3.  The efficacy of local liposomal bupivacaine infiltration on pain and recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Baocheng Zhao; Xinlong Ma; Jinli Zhang; Jianxiong Ma; Qing Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Risk factors for liposomal bupivacaine resistance after total hip or knee arthroplasties: a retrospective observational cohort in 237 patients.

Authors:  Scott Buzin; Arianna L Gianakos; Deborah Li; Anthony Viola; Sherif Elkattawy; David M Keller; Richard S Yoon; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2020-01-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.