Literature DB >> 29033079

Polytrauma patients in the Netherlands and the USA: A bi-institutional comparison of processes and outcomes of care.

Suzan Dijkink1, Gwendolyn M van der Wilden2, Pieta Krijnen2, Lisa Dol2, Steven Rhemrev3, David R King4, Marc A DeMoya4, George C Velmahos4, Inger B Schipper2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern trauma systems differ worldwide, possibly leading to disparities in outcomes. We aim to compare characteristics and outcomes of blunt polytrauma patients admitted to two Level 1 Trauma Centers in the US (USTC) and the Netherlands (NTC).
METHODS: For this retrospective study the records of 1367 adult blunt trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 admitted between July 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 (640 from NTC, 727 from USTC) were analysed.
RESULTS: The USTC group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean [standard deviation] 1.15 [2.2] vs. 1.73 [2.8], p<0.0001) and Injury Severity Score (median [interquartile range, IQR] 25 [17-29] vs. 21 [17-26], p<0.0001). The in-hospital mortality was similar in both centers (11% in USTC vs. 10% NTC), also after correction for baseline differences in patient population in a multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.48, p=0.83). USTC patients had a longer Intensive Care Unit stay (median [IQR] 4 [2-11] vs. 2 [2-7] days, p=0.006) but had a shorter hospital stay (median [IQR] 6 [3-13] vs. 8 [4-16] days, p<0.0001). USTC patients were discharged more often to a rehabilitation center (47% vs 10%) and less often to home (46% vs. 66%, p<0.0001), and had a higher readmission rate (8% vs. 4%, p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Although several outcome parameters differ in two urban area trauma centers in the USA and the Netherlands, the quality of care for trauma patients, measured as survival, is equal. Other outcomes varied between both trauma centers, suggesting that differences in local policies and processes do influence the care system, but not so much the quality of care as reflected by survival.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital mortality; Injury severity score; Poly trauma; The Netherlands; The United States of America; Trauma outcomes; Trauma systems

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29033079     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  4 in total

Review 1.  Innate immune responses to trauma.

Authors:  Markus Huber-Lang; John D Lambris; Peter A Ward
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Severe thoracic trauma - still an independent predictor for death in multiple injured patients?

Authors:  Michael Grubmüller; Maximilian Kerschbaum; Eva Diepold; Katharina Angerpointner; Michael Nerlich; Antonio Ernstberger
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Differences in Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Penetrating Injuries in the USA and the Netherlands: A Multi-institutional Comparison.

Authors:  Suzan Dijkink; Pieta Krijnen; Aglaia Hage; Gwendolyn M Van der Wilden; George Kasotakis; Dennis Den Hartog; Ali Salim; J Carel Goslings; Frank W Bloemers; Steven J Rhemrev; David R King; George C Velmahos; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Genetic and immune crosstalk between severe burns and blunt trauma: A study of transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Xiaoming Chen; Kuan Wang; Dazhuang Li; Mingyue Zhao; Biao Huang; Wenxing Su; Daojiang Yu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.