Literature DB >> 29032499

DNA barcoding for molecular identification of Demodex based on mitochondrial genes.

Li Hu1, YuanJun Yang1,2, YaE Zhao3, DongLing Niu1, Rui Yang1, RuiLing Wang1, Zhaohui Lu1, XiaoQi Li1.   

Abstract

There has been no widely accepted DNA barcode for species identification of Demodex. In this study, we attempted to solve this issue. First, mitochondrial cox1-5' and 12S gene fragments of Demodex folloculorum, D. brevis, D. canis, and D. caprae were amplified, cloned, and sequenced for the first time; intra/interspecific divergences were computed and phylogenetic trees were reconstructed. Then, divergence frequency distribution plots of those two gene fragments were drawn together with mtDNA cox1-middle region and 16S obtained in previous studies. Finally, their identification efficiency was evaluated by comparing barcoding gap. Results indicated that 12S had the higher identification efficiency. Specifically, for cox1-5' region of the four Demodex species, intraspecific divergences were less than 2.0%, and interspecific divergences were 21.1-31.0%; for 12S, intraspecific divergences were less than 1.4%, and interspecific divergences were 20.8-26.9%. The phylogenetic trees demonstrated that the four Demodex species clustered separately, and divergence frequency distribution plot showed that the largest intraspecific divergence of 12S (1.4%) was less than cox1-5' region (2.0%), cox1-middle region (3.1%), and 16S (2.8%). The barcoding gap of 12S was 19.4%, larger than cox1-5' region (19.1%), cox1-middle region (11.3%), and 16S (13.0%); the interspecific divergence span of 12S was 6.2%, smaller than cox1-5' region (10.0%), cox1-middle region (14.1%), and 16S (11.4%). Moreover, 12S has a moderate length (517 bp) for sequencing at once. Therefore, we proposed mtDNA 12S was more suitable than cox1 and 16S to be a DNA barcode for classification and identification of Demodex at lower category level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA barcode; Demodex; Mitochondrial genes; Sequence divergence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29032499     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5641-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  24 in total

1.  High mitochondrial diversity in geographically widespread butterflies of Madagascar: a test of the DNA barcoding approach.

Authors:  Marjorie C Linares; Iván D Soto-Calderón; David C Lees; Nicola M Anthony
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Population identification and divergence threshold in Psoroptidae based on ribosomal ITS2 and mitochondrial COI genes.

Authors:  Cheng Juan; Liu ChengCheng; Zhao YaE; Hu Li; Yang YuanJun; Yang Fan; Shi ZhiYun
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Phylogenetic relationships within the snapping shrimp genus Synalpheus (Decapoda: Alpheidae).

Authors:  Kristin M Hultgren; Carla Hurt; Arthur Anker
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Demodex folliculorum (Simon) and D. brevis akbulatova of man: redescription and reevaluation.

Authors:  C Desch; W B Nutting
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  A molecular technique for the detection and differentiation of Demodex mites on cats.

Authors:  Linda A Frank; Stephen A Kania; Karianne Chung; Rupal Brahmbhatt
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 1.589

6.  Molecular identification and phylogenetic study of Demodex caprae.

Authors:  Ya-E Zhao; Juan Cheng; Li Hu; Jun-Xian Ma
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Phylogenetic relationships and new genetic tools for the detection and discrimination of the three feline Demodex mites.

Authors:  Katja Silbermayr; Christa Horvath-Ungerboeck; Barbara Eigner; Anja Joachim; Lluis Ferrer
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  The potential of distance-based thresholds and character-based DNA barcoding for defining problematic taxonomic entities by CO1 and ND1.

Authors:  T Bergmann; J Rach; S Damm; R Desalle; B Schierwater; H Hadrys
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 7.090

9.  Molecular identification of four phenotypes of human Demodex in China.

Authors:  Li Hu; Ya-E Zhao; Juan Cheng; Jun-Xian Ma
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.011

10.  Detection, Prevalence and Phylogenetic Relationships of Demodex spp and further Skin Prostigmata Mites (Acari, Arachnida) in Wild and Domestic Mammals.

Authors:  Natalia Sastre; Olga Francino; Joseph N Curti; Tiffany C Armenta; Devaughn L Fraser; Rochelle M Kelly; Erin Hunt; Katja Silbermayr; Christine Zewe; Armand Sánchez; Lluís Ferrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA gene: DNA barcodes for molecular classification and identification of mites.

Authors:  Yae Zhao; Wan-Yu Zhang; Rui-Ling Wang; Dong-Ling Niu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.876

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.