| Literature DB >> 29032381 |
Long Xiao1, Chunlin Ni1, Jiandong Shi1, Zhirong Wang1, Suchun Wang1, Jianwei Zhang2, Aiqing Lu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the correlation between vertebral endplate change and the level of lumbar disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 345 patients who were recruited from our hospital from May 2012 to May 2016 were evaluated for the presence of intervertebral disc degeneration or herniation. The degree of degeneration was assessed according to Pfirrmann grade. Vertebral endplate change was evaluated based on the endplate concave angle (ECA), and Modic change on sagittal MRI. The correlation between ECA and lumbar disc degeneration or Modic change and lumbar disc degeneration was analyzed. RESULTS The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in comparison of the ECAs in adjacent L3-5 vertebra between males and females. With the aggravation in degenerative changes of L3-5 discs, the ECAs of adjacent L3 superior endplate, L4 inferior and superior endplates and L5 inferior endplate were gradually enlarged, indicating the positive correlation between the lumbar disc degeneration and ECAs. The rate of Modic change in females was higher than that in males without a statistically significant difference. Area of Modic change was positively correlated with the degree of lumbar disc degeneration. Additionally, we also identified the positive correlation between the rate of Modic change and the degree of lumbar disc degeneration. CONCLUSIONS Endplate angle and lumbar disc degeneration are positively correlated. The endplates and endplate signal changes can reflect the degree of disc degeneration and Modic changes can reflect the rate of clinical lumbar disc degeneration degree.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29032381 PMCID: PMC5655151 DOI: 10.12659/msm.904315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Measurement of endplate concave angle. A and P point are the highest or lowest points of the endplate. C point is the lowest or highest point of the endplate. ∠ACP is the endplate concave angle (ECA).
Figure 2Measurement of Modic change rate. On sagittal plane of T2-weighted MR image, the rate of Modic change is the area of Modic change/the area of the whole vertebra.
Comparison of endplate concave angle (ECA) between different genders (θ/(°), χ̄±s).
| Gender | L3 caudal endplate | L4 cranial endplate | L4 caudal endplate | L5 cranial endplate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 165.4±3.1 | 165.1±4.2 | 167.5±4.1 | 169.5±2.3 |
| Female | 165.7±4.4 | 167.4±3.5 | 168.5±2.7 | 170.1±2.8 |
Correlation of endplate concave angle (ECA) and classification of lumbar disc degeneration (θ/(°), χ̄±s).
| Grade | L3 caudal endplate | L4 cranial endplate | L4 caudal endplate | L5 cranial endplate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 157.8±4.0 | 158.1±3.4 | 161.0±4.1 | 159.3±5.4 |
| II | 163.6±4.7 | 162.5±5.1 | 161.2±3.5 | 162.7±4.3 |
| III | 164.8±5.5 | 168.4±25 | 166.2±4.3 | 168.2±4.8 |
| IV | 171.2±5.3 | 172.5±4.1 | 172.5±3.5 | 173.7±4.2 |
| V | 178.7±6.1 | 180.1±3.5 | 178.3±2.7 | 177.4±5.5 |
Figure 3Correlation of endplate concave angle and classification of lumbar disc degeneration. Correlation of endplate concave angle and classification of lumbar disc degeneration in L3 caudal endplate (A), L4 cranial endplate (B), L4 caudal endplate (C) and L5 cranial endplate (D). As the intervertebral disc degeneration was aggravating, the adjacent endplate concave angle increased correspondingly.
Comparison of Modic change between different genders (N).
| Gender | Modic change | No Modic change |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 63 | 138 |
| Female | 57 | 87 |
Correlation of Modic change and classification of lumbar disc degeneration.
| Grade | Number of patients (N) | Area of vertebra (mm2) | Area of Modic change (mm2) | Modic change rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| II | 21 | 623.25±26.12 | 62.33±12.46 | 10.00±3.15 |
| III | 24 | 622.54±32.93 | 103.56±13.53 | 16.64±2.87 |
| IV | 35 | 622.75±27.45 | 162.34±14.56 | 26.07±3.18 |
| V | 40 | 618.98±23.79 | 228.54±17.39 | 36.92±2.73 |
Figure 4Correlation of Modic change and classification of lumbar disc degeneration. (A) Correlation of Modic change area and classification of lumbar disc degeneration. (B) Correlation of Modic change rate and classification of lumbar disc degeneration.