Literature DB >> 29032294

One year double blind study of high vs low frequency subcallosal cingulate stimulation for depression.

Renana Eitan1, Denys Fontaine2, Michel Benoît3, Caroline Giordana4, Nelly Darmon2, Zvi Israel5, Eduard Linesky6, David Arkadir6, Shiri Ben-Naim7, Moshe Iserlles8, Hagai Bergman9, Natasha Hulse10, Mohamed Abdelghani11, Peter McGuffin11, Anne Farmer11, Peichel DeLea12, Keyoumars Ashkan13, Bernard Lerer8.   

Abstract

Subcallosal Brodmann's Area 25 (Cg25) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a new promising therapy for treatment resistant major depressive disorder (TR-MDD). While different DBS stimulating parameters may have an impact on the efficacy and safety of the therapy, there is no data to support a protocol for optimal stimulation parameters for depression. Here we present a prospective multi-center double-blind randomized crossed-over 13-month study that evaluated the effects of High (130 Hz) vs Low (20 Hz) frequency Cg25 stimulation for nine patients with TR-MDD. Four out of nine patients achieved response criteria (≥40% reduction of symptom score) compared to mean baseline values at the end of the study. The mean percent change of MADRS score showed a similar improvement in the high and low frequency stimulation groups after 6 months of stimulation (-15.4 ± 21.1 and -14.7 ± 21.1 respectively). The mean effect at the end of the second period (6 months after cross-over) was higher than the first period (first 6 months of stimulation) in all patients (-23.4 ± 19.9 (n = 6 periods) and -13.0 ± 22 (n = 9 periods) respectively). At the end of the second period, the mean percent change of the MADRS scores improved more in the high than low frequency groups (-31.3 ± 19.3 (n = 4 patients) and -7.7 ± 10.9 (n = 2 patients) respectively). Given the small numbers, detailed statistical analysis is challenging. Nonetheless the results of this study suggest that long term high frequency stimulation might confer the best results. Larger scale, randomized double blind trials are needed in order to evaluate the most effective stimulation parameters.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; High frequency stimulation; Low frequency stimulation; Subcallosal cingulate area; Treatment resistant major depressive disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29032294     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  10 in total

1.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.

Authors:  Martijn Figee; Patricio Riva-Posse; Ki Sueng Choi; Lucia Bederson; Helen S Mayberg; Brian H Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.088

Review 2.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: an integrative review of preclinical and clinical findings and translational implications.

Authors:  M P Dandekar; A J Fenoy; A F Carvalho; J C Soares; J Quevedo
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 3.  Invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Illness–Proposed Indications and Approaches.

Authors:  Thomas E Schläpfer; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Matthis Synofzik; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Jürgen Voges; Volker A Coenen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Informed Consent Decision-Making in Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Gabriele Mandarelli; Germana Moretti; Massimo Pasquini; Giuseppe Nicolò; Stefano Ferracuti
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-05-11

Review 5.  Dosing of Electrical Parameters in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Intractable Depression: A Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Stefan Lang; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Recruitment Challenges for Studies of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sandra Golding; Kimberly Williams; Aaron Mackie; Glenda MacQueen; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 7.  Subcallosal Cingulate Cortex Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michał Sobstyl; Anna Kupryjaniuk; Marek Prokopienko; Marcin Rylski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 8.  Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andres M Lozano; Nir Lipsman; Hagai Bergman; Peter Brown; Stephan Chabardes; Jin Woo Chang; Keith Matthews; Cameron C McIntyre; Thomas E Schlaepfer; Michael Schulder; Yasin Temel; Jens Volkmann; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Enriched Environment Facilitates Anxiolytic Efficacy Driven by Deep-Brain Stimulation of Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Yamini Bhaskar; Lee Wei Lim; Rupshi Mitra
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Maarten van Westen; Erik Rietveld; Isidoor O Bergfeld; Pelle de Koning; Nienke Vullink; Pieter Ooms; Ilse Graat; Luka Liebrand; Pepijn van den Munckhof; Rick Schuurman; Damiaan Denys
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-07-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.