Literature DB >> 29032007

The effect of sevoflurane compared to propofol maintenance on post-surgical quality of recovery in patients undergoing an ambulatory gynecological surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial.

Gildasio S De Oliveira1, Jane Bialek2, Meghan E Rodes2, Mark C Kendall2, Robert J McCarthy2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the effect of propofol used as anesthetic maintenance compared to sevoflurane on global post-surgical quality of recovery in female patients undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery.
DESIGN: The study was a prospective randomized double blinded, controlled, clinical trial.
INTERVENTIONS: Healthy female subjects were randomized to receive propofol or sevoflurane as anesthetic maintenance. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 40 (QOR-40) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Other data collected included opioid consumption, pain scores and time to hospital discharge. P<0.05 was used to reject the null hypothesis for the primary outcome. MAIN
RESULTS: Ninety subjects were randomized and sixty seven completed the study. Patient's baseline characteristics and surgical factors were not different between study groups. There was not a clinically significant difference in the global QoR-40 scores between the sevoflurane and the propofol groups, median (IQR) of 175 (163 to 181) and 176 (163 to 184), respectively, P=0.97. There was an inverse relationship (ρ=-0.42) between the opioid consumption in PACU (IV morphine equivalents) and 24h postoperative quality of recovery (P<0.001) and an inverse relationship (ρ=-0.48) between the oral opioid consumption at home (oral morphine equivalents) and 24h postoperative quality of recovery, P<0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: Our current results do not support the use of total intravenous anesthesia as an efficacious strategy to improve global quality of recovery after ambulatory surgery. Opioid consumption in the PACU is an earlier surrogate that can be utilized to identify ambulatory patients with a high likelihood to develop poor global quality of recovery and who may benefit from more efficacious strategies to improve global quality of recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov; url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; registration identified: NCT 01755234.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Propofol; Quality of recovery; Sevoflurane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29032007     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  9 in total

1.  Comment on: "The effect of corticosteroid on postoperative early pain, renal colic and total analgesic consumption after uncomplicated and unstented ureteroscopy: a matched-pair analysis".

Authors:  Mark C Kendall
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Effects of general anesthesia on quality of recovery after transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Hung; Kuo-Cherh Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Esmolol does not improve quality of postsurgical recovery after ambulatory hysteroscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Mark C Kendall; Robert J McCarthy
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Regional anesthesia to ameliorate postoperative analgesia outcomes in pediatric surgical patients: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mark C Kendall; Lucas J Castro Alves; Edward I Suh; Zachary L McCormick; Gildasio S De Oliveira
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2018-11-15

Review 5.  Liposome Bupivacaine Compared to Plain Local Anesthetics to Reduce Postsurgical Pain: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Mark C Kendall; Lucas Jorge Castro Alves; Gildasio De Oliveira
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-15

6.  Anesthetic effect of propofol combined with remifentanil or sevoflurane anesthesia on patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yazhen Feng; Ji Li; Hushan Wang; Zongsheng Duan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Impact of Sevoflurane Versus Propofol Anesthesia on Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Cancer Patients: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Liang Guo; Fei Lin; Huijun Dai; Xueke Du; Meigang Yu; Jinxi Zhang; Huimei Huang; Wanyun Ge; Guanghua Tao; Linghui Pan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-02-15

8.  Comparison of the impact of propofol versus sevoflurane on early postoperative recovery in living donors after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Sangbin Han; Jaesik Park; Sang Hyun Hong; Soojin Lim; Yong Hyun Park; Min Suk Chae
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  The impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhiyu Geng; Hui Bi; Dai Zhang; Changji Xiao; Han Song; Ye Feng; Xinni Cao; Xueying Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.