Literature DB >> 29031136

Increased sensory noise and not muscle weakness explains changes in non-stepping postural responses following stance perturbations in healthy elderly.

Maarten Afschrift1, Friedl De Groote2, Sabine Verschueren3, Ilse Jonkers2.   

Abstract

The response to stance perturbations changes with age. The shift from an ankle to a hip strategy with increasing perturbation magnitude occurs at lower accelerations in older than in young adults. This strategy shift has been related to age-related changes in muscle and sensory function. However, the effect of isolated changes in muscle or sensory function on the responses following stance perturbations cannot be determined experimentally since changes in muscle and sensory function occur simultaneously. Therefore, we used predictive simulations to estimate the effect of isolated changes in (rates of change in) maximal joint torques, functional base of support, and sensory noise on the response to backward platform translations. To evaluate whether these modeled changes in muscle and sensory function could explain the observed changes in strategy; simulated postural responses with a torque-driven double inverted pendulum model controlled using optimal state feedback were compared to measured postural responses in ten healthy young and ten healthy older adults. The experimentally observed peak hip angle during the response was significantly larger (5°) and the functional base of support was smaller (0.04m) in the older than in the young adults but peak joint torques and rates of joint torque were similar during the recovery. The addition of noise to the sensed states in the predictive simulations could explain the observed increase in peak hip angle in the elderly, whereas changes in muscle function could not. Hence, our results suggest that strength training alone might be insufficient to improve postural control in elderly.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Postural control; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29031136     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  2 in total

1.  [Effects of knee pain on postural control excluding the musculature of the craniomandibular system].

Authors:  S Missalla; J Schulze; J Bille; L Maltry; D Ohlendorf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Interactions between initial posture and task-level goal explain experimental variability in postural responses to perturbations of standing balance.

Authors:  Tom Van Wouwe; Lena H Ting; Friedl De Groote
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.