Literature DB >> 29030073

Comparative Analysis of Surgery, Thermal Ablation, and Active Surveillance for Renal Oncocytic Neoplasms.

Brady L Miller1, Lori Mankowski Gettle2, Jason R Van Roo1, Timothy J Ziemlewicz2, Sara L Best1, Shane A Wells2, Meghan G Lubner2, J Louis Hinshaw3, Fred T Lee3, Stephen Y Nakada3, Wei Huang4, E Jason Abel5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare oncological and procedural outcomes for renal oncocytic tumors treated with surgery, thermal ablation, or active surveillance.
METHODS: Clinical and pathologic data were collected for consecutive patients with a histologic diagnosis of oncocytoma, oncocytic neoplasm, or chromophobe renal cell cancer (chRCC) from 2003 to 2016. Independent pathology and radiology reviews were performed for this study.
RESULTS: Of 171 patients, tumor histology included oncocytoma (n = 122), chRCC (n = 47), and oncocytic neoplasm not otherwise specified (n = 2). At the initial diagnosis, 67, 14, and 90 patients were treated with surgery, thermal ablation, and active surveillance. In 3 of 19 patients (16%) who had biopsy and subsequent surgery, diagnosis changed from oncocytoma to chRCC. The median follow-up was 39.9 months with no difference among choices of treatment modalities (P = .33). Of 90 patients who began active surveillance, 32 (36%) switched to active treatments (19 underwent thermal ablation and 13 underwent surgery). The median linear growth rate for patients on active surveillance was 1.2 mm/y. No patients who were managed with active surveillance developed metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). mRCC was identified in 3 patients and was the cause of death in 2 patients. Patients who developed metastatic disease presented with symptomatic tumors of >4 cm and were treated with immediate surgery. For oncocytic masses of ≤4 cm (n = 126), the 5-year cancer-specific survival was 100%.
CONCLUSION: Renal oncocytic neoplasms have favorable oncological outcomes. Active surveillance is safe and is the preferred management for small (≤4 cm) oncocytic renal tumors in selected patients.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29030073     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Predicting aggressive behavior in small renal tumors prior to treatment.

Authors:  Daniel D Shapiro; E Jason Abel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Baboudjian; Daniel Moser; Takafumi Yanagisawa; Bastien Gondran-Tellier; Eva M Compérat; Damien Ambrosetti; Laurent Daniel; Cyrille Bastide; Shahrokh F Shariat; Eric Lechevallier; Pietro Diana; Alberto Breda; Benjamin Pradere; Romain Boissier
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Renal Tumors in Pregnancy: A Case Report Focusing on the Timing of the Surgery and Patient Positioning.

Authors:  Hamidreza Ghorbani; Mahdi Mottaghi; Salman Soltani
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02-26

4.  Distinguishing Benign Renal Tumors with an Oncocytic Gene Expression (ONEX) Classifier.

Authors:  Patrick D McGillivray; Daiki Ueno; Aydin Pooli; Neil Mendhiratta; Jamil S Syed; Kevin A Nguyen; Peter G Schulam; Peter A Humphrey; Adebowale J Adeniran; Paul C Boutros; Brian Shuch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Application of Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Uro-Oncology: Discovering Potential Biomarkers.

Authors:  Péter Czétány; Stefánia Gitta; András Balló; Alexandra Sulc; Gábor Máté; Árpád Szántó; László Márk
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.