Courtney A Polenick1,2, Amanda N Leggett1,2, Noah J Webster3, Benjamin H Han4,5, Steven H Zarit6, John D Piette7,8. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2. Program for Positive Aging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Medicine, New York University. 5. Department of Population Health, New York University. 6. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. 7. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 8. Department of Veterans Affairs, HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are common and have harmful consequences in later life. Along with managing their own health, many aging adults care for an impaired partner. Spousal caregiving may be more stressful when caregivers have MCCs, particularly those involving complex management. Yet, little is known about combinations of conditions that are most consequential for caregiving outcomes. METHOD: Using a U.S. sample of 359 spousal caregivers and care recipients from the 2011 National Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving, we examined three categories of MCCs based on similarity of management strategies (concordant only, discordant only, and both concordant and discordant) and their associations with caregiving difficulties and gains. We also considered gender differences. RESULTS: Relative to caregivers without MCCs, caregivers with discordant MCCs reported fewer gains, whereas caregivers with both concordant and discordant MCCs reported greater emotional and physical difficulties. Wives with discordant MCCs only reported a trend for greater physical difficulties. Caregivers with concordant MCCs did not report more difficulties or gains. DISCUSSION: Spousal caregivers with MCCs involving discordant management strategies appear to be at risk for adverse care-related outcomes and may benefit from support in maintaining their own health as well as their caregiving responsibilities.
OBJECTIVES: Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are common and have harmful consequences in later life. Along with managing their own health, many aging adults care for an impaired partner. Spousal caregiving may be more stressful when caregivers have MCCs, particularly those involving complex management. Yet, little is known about combinations of conditions that are most consequential for caregiving outcomes. METHOD: Using a U.S. sample of 359 spousal caregivers and care recipients from the 2011 National Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving, we examined three categories of MCCs based on similarity of management strategies (concordant only, discordant only, and both concordant and discordant) and their associations with caregiving difficulties and gains. We also considered gender differences. RESULTS: Relative to caregivers without MCCs, caregivers with discordant MCCs reported fewer gains, whereas caregivers with both concordant and discordant MCCs reported greater emotional and physical difficulties. Wives with discordant MCCs only reported a trend for greater physical difficulties. Caregivers with concordant MCCs did not report more difficulties or gains. DISCUSSION: Spousal caregivers with MCCs involving discordant management strategies appear to be at risk for adverse care-related outcomes and may benefit from support in maintaining their own health as well as their caregiving responsibilities.
Authors: C Barrett Bowling; Laura Plantinga; Lawrence S Phillips; William McClellan; Katharina Echt; Neale Chumbler; Gerald McGwin; Ann Vandenberg; Richard M Allman; Theodore M Johnson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth M Magnan; Mari Palta; Heather M Johnson; Christie M Bartels; Jessica R Schumacher; Maureen A Smith Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Nigel K Arden; Sarah Crozier; Helen Smith; Frazer Anderson; Christopher Edwards; Helen Raphael; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2006-08-15
Authors: Alessandra Saldanha de Mattos Matheus; Lucianne Righeti Monteiro Tannus; Roberta Arnoldi Cobas; Catia C Sousa Palma; Carlos Antonio Negrato; Marilia de Brito Gomes Journal: Int J Hypertens Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 2.420
Authors: Glenna S Brewster; Victor Molinari; Christina McCrae; Jason Beckstead; Rita D'Aoust; Meredeth Rowe Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 1.774
Authors: Courtney A Polenick; Lianlian Lei; Annie N Zhou; Kira S Birditt; Donovan T Maust Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Louis Jacob; Hans Oh; Jae Il Shin; Josep Maria Haro; Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs; Sarah E Jackson; Lee Smith; Ai Koyanagi Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 6.053