BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir, an HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitor, and simeprevir, an HCV NS3/4A PI, have the potential to interact as dolutegravir is a P-glycoprotein, uridine glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 and cytochrome P4503A substrate and simeprevir has been shown to mildly inhibit these. OBJECTIVES: To compare dolutegravir and simeprevir pharmacokinetics (PK) when given separately versus in combination. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received: (i) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily for 7 days; (ii) 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days; and (iii) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily plus 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days, with randomization to treatment sequence. Twenty-four hour intensive PK sampling was performed on day 7 of each sequence following observed dosing and a standardized meal. PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods and compared using paired t-tests. Bioequivalence for area under the curve (AUCtau) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were also assessed. NCT02404805. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects completed all three sequences. Dolutegravir trough was increased 24% (P = 0.0003) with simeprevir. Dolutegravir AUCtau was increased 15% (P = 0.002), but was deemed bioequivalent as the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio was 107%-123%. Dolutegravir Cmax was bioequivalent. Simeprevir PK was unaffected by dolutegravir. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events and all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir trough was increased slightly with simeprevir, but AUCtau was bioequivalent. Despite the increase in trough, dolutegravir concentrations were well within the range with established safety data. Suggesting that simeprevir and dolutegravir can be safely co-administered.
BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir, an HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitor, and simeprevir, an HCV NS3/4A PI, have the potential to interact as dolutegravir is a P-glycoprotein, uridine glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 and cytochrome P4503A substrate and simeprevir has been shown to mildly inhibit these. OBJECTIVES: To compare dolutegravir and simeprevir pharmacokinetics (PK) when given separately versus in combination. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received: (i) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily for 7 days; (ii) 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days; and (iii) 150 mg of simeprevir once daily plus 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily for 7 days, with randomization to treatment sequence. Twenty-four hour intensive PK sampling was performed on day 7 of each sequence following observed dosing and a standardized meal. PK parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods and compared using paired t-tests. Bioequivalence for area under the curve (AUCtau) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were also assessed. NCT02404805. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects completed all three sequences. Dolutegravir trough was increased 24% (P = 0.0003) with simeprevir. Dolutegravir AUCtau was increased 15% (P = 0.002), but was deemed bioequivalent as the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio was 107%-123%. Dolutegravir Cmax was bioequivalent. Simeprevir PK was unaffected by dolutegravir. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events and all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir trough was increased slightly with simeprevir, but AUCtau was bioequivalent. Despite the increase in trough, dolutegravir concentrations were well within the range with established safety data. Suggesting that simeprevir and dolutegravir can be safely co-administered.
Authors: Mark G J de Boer; Guido E L van den Berk; Natasja van Holten; Josephine E Oryszcyn; Willemien Dorama; Daoud Ait Moha; Kees Brinkman Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Rainer Weber; Caroline A Sabin; Nina Friis-Møller; Peter Reiss; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Ole Kirk; Francois Dabis; Matthew G Law; Christian Pradier; Stephane De Wit; Börje Akerlund; Gonzalo Calvo; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Martin Rickenbach; Bruno Ledergerber; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006 Aug 14-28
Authors: Carmen Martinez-Sierra; Ana Arizcorreta; Fernando Díaz; Rafael Roldán; Leopoldo Martín-Herrera; Eugenio Pérez-Guzmán; José A Girón-González Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2003-01-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Lisa L Ross; Ivy H Song; Niki Arya; Mike Choukour; Jian Zong; Shu-Pang Huang; Timothy Eley; Brian Wynne; Ann M Buchanan Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Paul Kwo; Norman Gitlin; Ronald Nahass; David Bernstein; Kyle Etzkorn; Sergio Rojter; Eugene Schiff; Mitchell Davis; Peter Ruane; Ziad Younes; Ronald Kalmeijer; Rekha Sinha; Monika Peeters; Oliver Lenz; Bart Fevery; Guy De La Rosa; Jane Scott; James Witek Journal: Hepatology Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 17.425