| Literature DB >> 29029119 |
David H MacIver1,2,3, John B Partridge4, Peter Agger5,6, Robert S Stephenson6, Bastiaan J D Boukens7, Camilla Omann8, Jonathan C Jarvis9, Henggui Zhang3.
Abstract
Two of the leading concepts of mural ventricular architecture are the unique myocardial band and the myocardial mesh model. We have described, in an accompanying article published in this journal, how the anatomical, histological and high-resolution computed tomographic studies strongly favour the latter concept. We now extend the argument to describe the linkage between mural architecture and ventricular function in both health and disease. We show that clinical imaging by echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiological studies, all support the myocardial mesh model. We also provide evidence that the unique myocardial band model is not compatible with much of scientific research.Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Contractile stress; Diastolic function; Echocardiography; Electrophysiology; Helical heart; Helical ventricular myocardial band; Ventricular anatomy; Ventricular function
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29029119 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1010-7940 Impact factor: 4.191