Literature DB >> 29029117

The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): second report.

Theo M M H de By1, Paul Mohacsi2, Brigitta Gahl2, Armin Zittermann3, Thomas Krabatsch4, Finn Gustafsson5, Pascal Leprince6, Bart Meyns7, Ivan Netuka8, Kadir Caliskan9, Evaristo Castedo10, Francesco Musumeci11, André Vincentelli12, Roland Hetzer13, Jan Gummert3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) was founded in Berlin, Germany. EUROMACS is supported fully by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and, since 2014, has functioned as a committee of the EACTS. The purpose of having the EUROMACS as a part of the EACTS is to accumulate clinical data related to long-term mechanical circulatory support for scientific purposes and to publish annual reports.
METHODS: Participating hospitals contributed surgical and cardiological pre-, peri- and long-term postoperative data of mechanical circulatory support implants to the registry. Data for all implants performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016 were analysed. Several auditing methods were used to monitor the quality of the data. Data could be provided for in-depth studies, and custom data could be provided at the request of clinicians and scientists. This report includes updates of patient characteristics, implant frequency, mortality rates and adverse events.
RESULTS: Fifty-two hospitals participated in the registry. This report is based on 2947 registered implants in 2681 patients. Survival of adult patients (>17 years of age) with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices with a mean follow-up of 391 days was 69% (95% confidence interval 66-71%) 1 year after implantation. On average, patients were observed for 12 months (median 7 months, range 0-70 months). When we investigated for adverse events, we found an overall event rate per 100 patient-months of 3.56 for device malfunction, 6.45 for major bleeding, 6.18 for major infection and 3.03 for neurological events within the first 3 months after implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the first EUROMACS report, the number of participating hospitals increased from 21 to 52 (+148%), whereas the number of registered implants more than tripled from 825 to 2947 (+257%). The increase in the number of participating hospitals led us to increase the quality control measures through data input control, on-site audits and statistical analyses.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End-stage heart failure; Mechanical circulatory support; Registry; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29029117     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  25 in total

1.  Conventional and alternative sites for left ventricular assist device inflow and outflow cannula placement.

Authors:  Antonio Loforte; Tomaso Bottio; Matteo Attisani; Sofia Martin Suarez; Vincenzo Tarzia; Marco Pocar; Luca Botta; Gino Gerosa; Mauro Rinaldi; Davide Pacini
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation: paracorporeal ventricular assist device as alternative to extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Sandro Sponga; Giovanni Benedetti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

3.  Permanent Implantable Cardiac Support Systems.

Authors:  Jan F Gummert; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto; Evgenij Potapov; René Schramm; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Bleeding in critical care associated with left ventricular assist devices: pathophysiology, symptoms, and management.

Authors:  F W G Leebeek; R Muslem
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 5.  Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections Associated With Left Ventricular Assist Devices in 3 Patients.

Authors:  Manavotam Singh; Mrinalini Krishnan; Maria Elena Ruiz; Farooq H Sheikh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  Left ventricular assist device implantation with concomitant tricuspid valve repair: is there really a benefit?

Authors:  Konstantin Zhigalov; Marcin Szczechowicz; Ahmed Mashhour; Bakitbek K Kadyraliev; Sabreen Mkalaluh; Jerry Easo; Juergen Ennker; Harald C Eichstaedt; Alexander Weymann
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Heart transplantation after SynCardia® total artificial heart implantation.

Authors:  Michiel Morshuis; Sebastian V Rojas; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Artyom Razumov; Jan F Gummert; René Schramm
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-03

8.  Self-management for patients on ventricular assist device support: a national, multicentre study: protocol for a 3-phase study.

Authors:  Christiane Kugler; Hannah Spielmann; Maiken Seemann; Volker Lauenroth; Renata Wacker; Wolfgang Albert; Christine Spitz-Koeberich; Sandra Semmig-Koenze; Maja von Cube; Katharina Tigges-Limmer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Survival after left ventricular assist device implantation correlates with a novel device-based measure of heart rate variability: the heart rate score.

Authors:  Thomas Czermak; Valentina Seitelberger; Christian Hagl; Patrick-Nicolas Samson-Himmelstjerna; Sven Groß; Sebastian Sadoni; Oliver Heyn; Antonia Kellnar; Bonnie Hartrampf; Eric Lemmermöhle; Ina Klier; Raphael Rehms; Sabine Hoffmann; Heidi L Estner; Stephanie Fichtner; Korbinian Lackermair
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

10.  Exploring the Operative Strategy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Francesca Bellomo; Pierluigi Nappi; Camilla Chello; Adelaide Iervolino; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.