Mikaela Smit1,2, Rosan A van Zoest3, Brooke E Nichols4, Ilonca Vaartjes5, Colette Smit1, Marc van der Valk6, Ard van Sighem1, Ferdinand W Wit1,3,6, Timothy B Hallett2, Peter Reiss1,3,6. 1. Stichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development. 4. Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. 5. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is expected to contribute a large noncommunicable disease burden among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people. We quantify the impact of prevention interventions on annual CVD burden and costs among HIV-infected people in the Netherlands. Methods: We constructed an individual-based model of CVD in HIV-infected people using national ATHENA (AIDS Therapy Evaluation in The Netherlands) cohort data on 8791 patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The model follows patients as they age, develop CVD (by incorporating a CVD risk equation), and start cardiovascular medication. Four prevention interventions were evaluated: (1) increasing the rate of earlier HIV diagnosis and treatment; (2) avoiding use of cART with increased CVD risk; (3) smoking cessation; and (4) intensified monitoring and drug treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia, quantifying annual number of averted CVDs and costs. Results: The model predicts that annual CVD incidence and costs will increase by 55% and 36% between 2015 and 2030. Traditional prevention interventions (ie, smoking cessation and intensified monitoring and treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia) will avert the largest number of annual CVD cases (13.1% and 20.0%) compared with HIV-related interventions-that is, earlier HIV diagnosis and treatment and avoiding cART with increased CVD risk (0.8% and 3.7%, respectively)-as well as reduce cumulative CVD-related costs. Targeting high-risk patients could avert the majority of events and costs. Conclusions: Traditional CVD prevention interventions can maximize cardiovascular health and defray future costs, particularly if targeting high-risk patients. Quantifying additional public health benefits, beyond CVD, is likely to provide further evidence for policy development.
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is expected to contribute a large noncommunicable disease burden among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people. We quantify the impact of prevention interventions on annual CVD burden and costs among HIV-infectedpeople in the Netherlands. Methods: We constructed an individual-based model of CVD in HIV-infectedpeople using national ATHENA (AIDS Therapy Evaluation in The Netherlands) cohort data on 8791 patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The model follows patients as they age, develop CVD (by incorporating a CVD risk equation), and start cardiovascular medication. Four prevention interventions were evaluated: (1) increasing the rate of earlier HIV diagnosis and treatment; (2) avoiding use of cART with increased CVD risk; (3) smoking cessation; and (4) intensified monitoring and drug treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia, quantifying annual number of averted CVDs and costs. Results: The model predicts that annual CVD incidence and costs will increase by 55% and 36% between 2015 and 2030. Traditional prevention interventions (ie, smoking cessation and intensified monitoring and treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia) will avert the largest number of annual CVD cases (13.1% and 20.0%) compared with HIV-related interventions-that is, earlier HIV diagnosis and treatment and avoiding cART with increased CVD risk (0.8% and 3.7%, respectively)-as well as reduce cumulative CVD-related costs. Targeting high-risk patients could avert the majority of events and costs. Conclusions: Traditional CVD prevention interventions can maximize cardiovascular health and defray future costs, particularly if targeting high-risk patients. Quantifying additional public health benefits, beyond CVD, is likely to provide further evidence for policy development.
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad Journal: Blood Press Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Matthew S Freiberg; Chung-Chou H Chang; Lewis H Kuller; Melissa Skanderson; Elliott Lowy; Kevin L Kraemer; Adeel A Butt; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; David Leaf; Kris Ann Oursler; David Rimland; Maria Rodriguez Barradas; Sheldon Brown; Cynthia Gibert; Kathy McGinnis; Kristina Crothers; Jason Sico; Heidi Crane; Alberta Warner; Stephen Gottlieb; John Gottdiener; Russell P Tracy; Matthew Budoff; Courtney Watson; Kaku A Armah; Donna Doebler; Kendall Bryant; Amy C Justice Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Elena Losina; Emily P Hyle; Ethan D Borre; Benjamin P Linas; Paul E Sax; Milton C Weinstein; Corinna Rusu; Andrea L Ciaranello; Rochelle P Walensky; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Birgit Grund; Jason V Baker; Steven G Deeks; Julian Wolfson; Deborah Wentworth; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Calvin J Cohen; Andrew Phillips; Jens D Lundgren; James D Neaton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Margaret T May; Mark Gompels; Valerie Delpech; Kholoud Porter; Chloe Orkin; Stephen Kegg; Phillip Hay; Margaret Johnson; Adrian Palfreeman; Richard Gilson; David Chadwick; Fabiola Martin; Teresa Hill; John Walsh; Frank Post; Martin Fisher; Jonathan Ainsworth; Sophie Jose; Clifford Leen; Mark Nelson; Jane Anderson; Caroline Sabin Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Mark A Boyd; Amanda Mocroft; Lene Ryom; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Caroline Sabin; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Camilla Ingrid Hatleberg; Stephane De Wit; Rainer Weber; Eric Fontas; Andrew Phillips; Fabrice Bonnet; Peter Reiss; Jens Lundgren; Matthew Law Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Prasanta K Dash; Fadhel A Alomar; Bryan T Hackfort; Hang Su; Amy Conaway; Larisa Y Poluektova; Howard E Gendelman; Santhi Gorantla; Keshore R Bidasee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tamara Sonia Boender; Colette Smit; Ard van Sighem; Daniela Bezemer; Catriona J Ester; Sima Zaheri; Ferdinand W N M Wit; Peter Reiss Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Gregory D Huhn; David J Shamblaw; Jean-Guy Baril; Priscilla Y Hsue; Brittany L Mills; Thai Nguyen-Cleary; Scott McCallister; Moupali Das Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.835