Literature DB >> 29028757

Patient Experience-based Value Sets: Are They Stable?

A Simon Pickard1, Yu-Ting Hung, Fang-Ju Lin, Todd A Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although societal preference weights are desirable to inform resource-allocation decision-making, patient experienced health state-based value sets can be useful for clinical decision-making, but context may matter.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate EQ-5D value sets using visual analog scale (VAS) ratings for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery and compare the estimates before and after surgery.
METHODS: We used the Patient Reported Outcome Measures data collected by the UK National Health Service on patients undergoing knee replacement from 2009 to 2012. Generalized least squares regression models were used to derive value sets based on the EQ-5D-3 level using a development sample before and after surgery, and model performance was examined using a validation sample.
RESULTS: A total of 90,450 preoperative and postoperative valuations were included. For preoperative valuations, the largest decrement in VAS values was associated with the dimension of anxiety/depression, followed by self-care, mobility, usual activities, and pain/discomfort. However, pain/discomfort had a greater impact on VAS value decrement in postoperative valuations. Compared with preoperative health problems, postsurgical health problems were associated with larger value decrements, with significant differences in several levels and dimensions, including level 2 of mobility, level 2/3 of usual activities, level 3 of pain/discomfort, and level 3 of anxiety/depression. Similar results were observed across subgroups stratified by age and sex.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest patient experience-based value sets are not stable (ie, context such as timing matters). However, the knowledge that lower values are assigned to health states postsurgery compared with presurgery may be useful for the patient-doctor decision-making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29028757     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of self-rated health using EQ-5D VAS in the United States in 2002 and 2017.

Authors:  Ashley S Cha; Ernest H Law; James W Shaw; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Patient characteristics and valuation changes impact quality of life and satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty - results from a German prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julia Felix; Christian Becker; Matthias Vogl; Peter Buschner; Werner Plötz; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Using EQ-5D Data to Measure Hospital Performance: Are General Population Values Distorting Patients' Choices?

Authors:  Nils Gutacker; Thomas Patton; Koonal Shah; David Parkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.583

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.