Literature DB >> 29028358

Posterior Tibial Translation Measurements on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improve Diagnostic Sensitivity for Chronic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Graft Tears.

Nicholas N DePhillipo1, Mark E Cinque2, Jonathan A Godin2, Gilbert Moatshe2, Jorge Chahla2, Robert F LaPrade1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is a highly sensitive and specific method for diagnosing acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, with a reported accuracy of 96% to 100%. In chronic and revision settings, these injuries may be missed on MRI because of the apparent continuity of nonfunctional PCL fibers. Posterior tibial translation (PTT) of the medial compartment has been identified as a potential secondary finding of PCL tear on routine MRI. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of PTT on MRI associated with PCL injuries and compare it with the sensitivity of a radiologist's MRI interpretation with preoperative posterior knee stress radiographs as the gold standard. Our hypothesis was that the MRI measurement of PTT of the medial compartment would improve diagnostic sensitivity as compared with the diagnosis made by the interpreting radiologist's evaluation of the continuity of the PCL fibers for chronic and postrecostruction graft injuries. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Cases of patients who underwent a primary or revision PCL reconstruction, without anterior cruciate ligament injury, by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements of medial and lateral compartment PTT were performed with the MRI of PCL-injured cases and controls without clinical or MRI evidence of ligamentous injury. The sensitivity of this technique was compared with the preoperative MRI diagnosis determined by review of the musculoskeletal radiologist's report and confirmed by the gold standard of posterior knee stress radiographs. The sensitivity of medial compartment PTT was determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and compared with the MRI sensitivity for chronic PCL and PCL graft tears.
RESULTS: One hundred patients (80 males and 20 females) with a mean age of 31.1 years (range, 15-66 years) met the inclusion criteria: 57 acute primary tears, 32 chronic primary, and 11 PCL graft tears. MRI sensitivity was 100% for acute primary PCL tears, 62.5% for chronic primary PCL tears, and 18.1% for PCL graft tears. There were significant differences in medial compartment PTT on MRI for acute versus chronic injuries ( P = .025) and acute versus graft injuries ( P = .007). ROC curve analysis indicated that the most accurate cutoff point for the detection of chronic PCL tears was 2.0 mm of medial compartment PTT on MRI, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 and 0.89, respectively. For PCL graft injuries, the ROC curve indicated that the most accurate medial compartment PTT cutoff for the detection of PCL graft failure was 3.6 mm (sensitivity, 0.92; specificity, 0.72).
CONCLUSION: MRI evaluation of the PCL fibers had poor sensitivity for chronic PCL tears and PCL reconstruction graft tears. The sensitivity for diagnosing chronic PCL tears and PCL reconstruction graft failures was improved by measuring posteromedial tibial translation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; posterior cruciate ligament; posterior knee instability; tibial translation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29028358     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517734201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Osteotomy for the Treatment of PCL Injuries.

Authors:  João V Novaretti; Andrew J Sheean; Jayson Lian; Joseph De Groot; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 2.  Revision PCL Reconstruction Review/Update.

Authors:  G Keith Gill; F Winston Gwathmey
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 3.  Cutting-Edge Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Principles.

Authors:  Foley J Schreier; Mark T Banovetz; Ariel N Rodriguez; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

4.  UTE-T2* versus conventional T2* mapping to assess posterior cruciate ligament ultrastructure and integrity-an in-situ study.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wilms; Karl Ludger Radke; David Latz; Thomas Andreas Thiel; Miriam Frenken; Benedikt Kamp; Timm Joachim Filler; Armin Michael Nagel; Anja Müller-Lutz; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08

5.  Decreased lateral posterior tibial slope and medial tibial depth are underlying anatomic risk factors for posterior cruciate ligament injury: a case-control study.

Authors:  Baoshan Yin; Pei Zhao; Jiaxing Chen; Wenlong Yan; Hua Zhang; Jian Zhang; Aiguo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Clinical Accuracy of the Lateral-Anterior Drawer Test for Diagnosing Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture.

Authors:  Gesine H Seeber; Christoph Thalhamer; Omer C Matthijs; Wolfgang Doskar; Phillip S Sizer; Djordje Lazovic
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 7.  Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 1: anatomy, biomechanics and diagnostics.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Bálint Zsidai; Nyaluma N Wagala; Jonathan D Hughes; Alexandra Horvath; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The MRI posterior drawer test to assess posterior cruciate ligament functionality and knee joint laxity.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wollschläger; Karl Ludger Radke; Justus Schock; Niklas Kotowski; David Latz; Dominika Kanschik; Timm Joachim Filler; Svenja Caspers; Gerald Antoch; Joachim Windolf; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Patients with isolated posterior cruciate ligament rupture had a higher posterior intercondylar eminence.

Authors:  Shi Weili; Meng Qingyang; Chen Nayun; Ma Yong; Yang Yuping; Liu Ping; Ao Yingfang; Gong Xi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.