Literature DB >> 29028258

Between-User Reliability of Tier 1 Exposure Assessment Tools Used Under REACH.

Judith Lamb1,2, Karen S Galea1, Brian G Miller1, Susanne Hesse3, Martie Van Tongeren1,4.   

Abstract

When applying simple screening (Tier 1) tools to estimate exposure to chemicals in a given exposure situation under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals Regulation 2006 (REACH), users must select from several possible input parameters. Previous studies have suggested that results from exposure assessments using expert judgement and from the use of modelling tools can vary considerably between assessors. This study aimed to investigate the between-user reliability of Tier 1 tools. A remote-completion exercise and in person workshop were used to identify and evaluate tool parameters and factors such as user demographics that may be potentially associated with between-user variability. Participants (N = 146) generated dermal and inhalation exposure estimates (N = 4066) from specified workplace descriptions ('exposure situations') and Tier 1 tool combinations (N = 20). Interactions between users, tools, and situations were investigated and described. Systematic variation associated with individual users was minor compared with random between-user variation. Although variation was observed between choices made for the majority of input parameters, differing choices of Process Category ('PROC') code/activity descriptor and dustiness level impacted most on the resultant exposure estimates. Exposure estimates ranging over several orders of magnitude were generated for the same exposure situation by different tool users. Such unpredictable between-user variation will reduce consistency within REACH processes and could result in under-estimation or overestimation of exposure, risking worker ill-health or the implementation of unnecessary risk controls, respectively. Implementation of additional support and quality control systems for all tool users is needed to reduce between-assessor variation and so ensure both the protection of worker health and avoidance of unnecessary business risk management expenditure.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REACH; exposure models; reliability; tiered approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29028258     DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Tools under REACH: Part I-Tier 1 Tools.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; Judith Lamb; Nenad Savic; Ioannis Basinas; Bojan Gasic; Christian Jung; Michael L Kashon; Jongwoon Kim; Martin Tischer; Martie van Tongeren; David Vernez; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 2.  Validity of Tier 1 Modelling Tools and Impacts on Exposure Assessments within REACH Registrations-ETEAM Project, Validation Studies and Consequences.

Authors:  Urs Schlueter; Martin Tischer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Theoretical Background of Occupational-Exposure Models-Report of an Expert Workshop of the ISES Europe Working Group "Exposure Models".

Authors:  Urs Schlüter; Susan Arnold; Francesca Borghi; John Cherrie; Wouter Fransman; Henri Heussen; Michael Jayjock; Keld Alstrup Jensen; Joonas Koivisto; Dorothea Koppisch; Jessica Meyer; Andrea Spinazzè; Celia Tanarro; Steven Verpaele; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Exposure modelling in Europe: how to pave the road for the future as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030.

Authors:  Urs Schlüter; Jessica Meyer; Andreas Ahrens; Francesca Borghi; Frédéric Clerc; Christiaan Delmaar; Antonio Di Guardo; Tatsiana Dudzina; Peter Fantke; Wouter Fransman; Stefan Hahn; Henri Heussen; Christian Jung; Joonas Koivisto; Dorothea Koppisch; Alicia Paini; Nenad Savic; Andrea Spinazzè; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.371

5.  How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.