Literature DB >> 29028254

Comparing the Advanced REACH Tool's (ART) Estimates With Switzerland's Occupational Exposure Data.

Nenad Savic1, Bojan Gasic2, Jody Schinkel3, David Vernez1.   

Abstract

The Advanced REACH Tool (ART) is the most sophisticated tool used for evaluating exposure levels under the European Union's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals (REACH) regulations. ART provides estimates at different percentiles of exposure and within different confidence intervals (CIs). However, its performance has only been tested on a limited number of exposure data. The present study compares ART's estimates with exposure measurements collected over many years in Switzerland. Measurements from 584 cases of exposure to vapours, mists, powders, and abrasive dusts (wood/stone and metal) were extracted from a Swiss database. The corresponding exposures at the 50th and 90th percentiles were calculated in ART. To characterize the model's performance, the 90% CI of the estimates was considered. ART's performance at the 50th percentile was only found to be insufficiently conservative with regard to exposure to wood/stone dusts, whereas the 90th percentile showed sufficient conservatism for all the types of exposure processed. However, a trend was observed with the residuals, where ART overestimated lower exposures and underestimated higher ones. The median was more precise, however, and the majority (≥60%) of real-world measurements were within a factor of 10 from ART's estimates. We provide recommendations based on the results and suggest further, more comprehensive, investigations.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REACH; advanced REACH Tool; exposure measurements; model performance and validation; occupational exposure models

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29028254     DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxx069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Tools under REACH: Part II-Higher Tier Tools.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; Judith Lamb; Nenad Savic; Ioannis Basinas; Bojan Gasic; Christian Jung; Michael L Kashon; Jongwoon Kim; Martin Tischer; Martie van Tongeren; David Vernez; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Adoption of Exposure Assessment Tools to Assist in Providing Respiratory Protection Recommendations.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; Diana M Ceballos
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 3.  Evaluating the Theoretical Background of STOFFENMANAGER® and the Advanced REACH Tool.

Authors:  Antti Joonas Koivisto; Michael Jayjock; Kaarle J Hämeri; Markku Kulmala; Patrick Van Sprang; Mingzhou Yu; Brandon E Boor; Tareq Hussein; Ismo K Koponen; Jakob Löndahl; Lidia Morawska; John C Little; Susan Arnold
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.