| Literature DB >> 29027947 |
Qiaofei Xu1, Xiaopeng Sun2, Feng Hu3, Rong Wan4, Vikram Singh5, Pengtao Ma6, Jingyang Niu7, Jingping Wang8.
Abstract
Two sandwich-type polyoxomolybdates Na₈[MO₂{Mo₂O₅(O₃PCH₃C(O)PO₃)}₂] (M = Ni2+ (1); Co2+ (2)) were synthesized by one-pot reaction of Na₂HPMo12O40·14H₂O, 1-hydroxy ethidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP=HOC(CH₃)(PO₃H₂)₂), and (1) NiCl₂/CoCl₂ (2). Compounds 1 and 2 were characterized by single crystal X-ray analysis, X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), IR spectroscopy, 31P NMR spectra, UV-vis spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). Structural analysis reveals that 1 and 2 exhibit similar centrosymmetric structure, which consists of one transition metal (TM) ion sandwiched by two same subunits {Mo₂O₅(O₃PCH₃C(O)PO₃)}. The clusters 1 and 2 show efficient catalytic activities for oxidation of thioanisole. Moreover, they are catalytically selective for oxidizing thioanisole. Both resuable polyoxomolybdates 1 and 2 catalysts show good thermo- and hydrolytic stability. It is noted that compound 1 shows outstanding catalytic activity for oxidation of various sulfides to corresponding sulfones with 93-100% selectivity at 97-100% conversion in one hour under mild conditions, which is potentially valuable to the removal of organic sulfides.Entities:
Keywords: catalyst; oxidation of sulfides; polyoxomolybdates
Year: 2017 PMID: 29027947 PMCID: PMC5666979 DOI: 10.3390/ma10101173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Crystal data and structure refinements for the compounds 1 and 2.
| Compounds | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Formula | C4H58Mo4Na8NiO52P4 | C4H54CoMo4Na8O50P4 |
| Formula weight/(g mol−1) | 1688.77 | 1652.96 |
| T (K) | 293(2) | 296(2) |
| Crystal system | triclinic | monoclinic |
| Space group | ||
| a/Å | 9.2505(9) | 23.5940(16) |
| b/Å | 10.8049(11) | 9.8626(6) |
| c/Å | 14.3226(13) | 21.1105(14) |
| α/° | 84.259(2) | 90 |
| β/° | 84.085(2) | 90.8400(10) |
| γ/° | 65.2980(10) | 90 |
| Volume/(Å3) | 1291.1(2) | 4911.8(6) |
| Z | 1 | 4 |
| Dcalcd (g cm−3) | 2.172 | 2.235 |
| μ/(mm−1) | 1.620 | 1.652 |
| F(000) | 842.0 | 3284.0 |
| Crystal size/(mm3) | 0.5 × 0.22 × 0.2 | 0.55 × 0.55 × 0.45 |
| Radiation | MoKα (λ = 0.71073) | MoKα (λ = 0.71073) |
| 2Θ range for data collection/° | 4.924 to 50.2 | 3.86 to 50.198 |
| Limiting indices | −10 ≤ h ≤ 11, | −28 ≤ h ≤ 26, |
| No. of reflections collected | 6591 | 11983 |
| No. of independent reflections | 4519 {Rint = 0.0171, Rsigma = 0.0315} | 4356 {Rint = 0.0163, Rsigma = 0.0196} |
| No. of parameters | 337 | 322 |
| GOF on | 1.091 | 1.080 |
| R1, wR2 [ | 0.0276, 0.0725 | 0.0291, 0.0776 |
| R1, wR2 [all data] | 0.0310, 0.0745 | 0.0310, 0.0786 |
Figure 1(a) polyhedral/ball-and-stick view of the monomer of compound 1 and 2; (b) Ball-and-stick view of {MoVI2O5} moieties; (c) the two-dimensional (2D) planar structure of compound 1; (d) the three-dimensional (3D) structure of compound 2; (MoO6/Mo: blue, tetrahedron of P/P: yellow, Co: amaranth, Ni: green, C: brown, O: red, Na: cyan-blue, Ni/Co: gray.)
Results for catalytic oxidation of thioanisole by compound 1 with H2O2 in acetonitrile in different conditions after 1 h.
| 1 | None | 50 | 1.25 | 37 | 16 | 84 |
| 2 | 1 | 50 | 1.25 | 90 | 20 | 80 |
| 3 | 2 | 50 | 1.25 | 96 | 11 | 89 |
| 4 | 3 | 50 | 1.25 | 98 | 6 | 94 |
| 5 | 3 | 25 | 1.25 | 63 | 22 | 78 |
| 6 | 3 | 40 | 1.25 | 92 | 19 | 81 |
| 7 | 3 | 50 | 1 | 96 | 27 | 73 |
| 8 | 3 | 50 | 0.5 | 47 | 79 | 21 |
| 9 | 3 | 50 | 0.25 | 24 | 88 | 12 |
Reaction conditions: thioanisole (0.5 mM, 0.06 mL); acetonitrile (5 mL). All products were identified by GC–MS spectra. The results refer to GC spectra based on dodecane as internal standard. a mol % = [n(catalyst)/n(thioanisole)] × 100%
Oxidation of various sulfides with H2O2 in the presence of the catalyst in acetonitrile.
| Entry | Substrate | Temp./°C | Time/h | Conv./% | Selectivity (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sulfoxide/Sulfone | ||||||
| 1 a | 50 | 0.5 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 2 | 50 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 3 | 50 | 1 | 100 | 3 | 97 | |
| 4 | 50 | 1 | 99 | 6 | 94 | |
| 5 | 50 | 1 | 97 | 6 | 94 | |
| 6 | 50 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 7 b | 60 | 1 | 98 | 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | 60 | 3 | 99 | 0.8 | 99 | |
a Reaction condition for the entries 1 to 6: catalyst, 3 mol %; substrate, 0.5 mmol; acetonitrile, 5 mL; H2O2, 1 mmol. b Reaction condition for entries 7 and 8: catalyst, 3 mol %; substrate, 0.5 mmol; acetonitrile, 2.5 mL; H2O2, 1.5 mmol. All of the products were identified by GC–MS spectra. The results refer to GC spectra based on dodecane as internal standard.
Figure 2The conversion and selectivity histogram of every recycle.
Figure 3(a) The TGA curve of compound 1; (b) The TGA curve of compound 2.
Figure 4UV spectra of compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b).
Figure 5(a) solution 31P NMR spectra of 1; (b) solution 31P NMR spectra of 2; (c) Solution 31P NMR spectra of 1-hydroxy ethidene diphosphonic acid (HEDP); (d) Solution 31P NMR spectra of the physical mixture of phosphate and molybdate. 31P NMR spectra appear at 0 ppm were referred to 85% H3PO4.
Figure 6Solution 31P NMR spectra of 1 after different tests. (a) 1 in CH3CN after 4 h at 50 °C; (b) 1 in CH3CN after five days at room temperature; (c) 30 mg of 1 after the second catalytic test in optimal conditions; (d) 30 mg of 1 after the third catalytic test in optimal conditions; 31P NMR spectra appears at 0 ppm were referred to 85% H3PO4.