Literature DB >> 29027853

Intraoperative test stimulation versus stereotactic accuracy as a surgical end point: a comparison of essential tremor outcomes after ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Tsinsue Chen1, Zaman Mirzadeh1, Kristina M Chapple1, Margaret Lambert1, Virgilio G H Evidente2, Guillermo Moguel-Cobos3, Srivadee Oravivattanakul3, Padma Mahant3, Francisco A Ponce1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor is traditionally performed with intraoperative test stimulation and conscious sedation, without general anesthesia (GA). Recently, the authors reported retrospective data on 17 patients undergoing DBS after induction of GA with standardized anatomical coordinates on T1-weighted MRI sequences used for indirect targeting. Here, they compare prospectively collected data from essential tremor patients undergoing DBS both with GA and without GA (non-GA). METHODS Clinical outcomes were prospectively collected at baseline and 3-month follow-up for patients undergoing DBS surgery performed by a single surgeon. Stereotactic, euclidean, and radial errors of lead placement were calculated. Functional (activities of daily living), quality of life (Quality of Life in Essential Tremor [QUEST] questionnaire), and tremor severity outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS Fifty-six patients underwent surgery: 16 without GA (24 electrodes) and 40 with GA (66 electrodes). The mean baseline functional scores and QUEST summary indices were not different between groups (p = 0.91 and p = 0.59, respectively). Non-GA and GA groups did not differ significantly regarding mean postoperative percentages of functional improvement (non-GA, 47.9% vs GA, 48.1%; p = 0.96) or QUEST summary indices (non-GA, 79.9% vs GA, 74.8%; p = 0.50). Accuracy was comparable between groups (mean radial error 0.9 ± 0.3 mm for non-GA and 0.9 ± 0.4 mm for GA patients) (p = 0.75). The mean euclidean error was also similar between groups (non-GA, 1.1 ± 0.6 mm vs GA, 1.2 ± 0.5 mm; p = 0.92). No patient had an intraoperative complication, and the number of postoperative complications was not different between groups (non-GA, n = 1 vs GA, n = 10; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS DBS performed with the patient under GA to treat essential tremor is as safe and effective as traditional DBS surgery with intraoperative test stimulation while the patient is under conscious sedation without GA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC-PC = anterior commissure–posterior commissure; ADL = activities of daily living; DBS = deep brain stimulation; ETRS = Essential Tremor Rating Scale; GA = general anesthesia; HOB = head of bed; QUEST = Quality of Life in Essential Tremor; VIM = ventral intermediate nucleus; deep brain stimulation; essential tremor; functional neurosurgery; functional outcomes; general anesthesia; iCT = intraoperative CT; intraoperative imaging; quality-of-life outcomes; tremor severity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29027853     DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS162487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

1.  The Effects of Different Anesthesia Methods on the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease by Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus.

Authors:  Yue Lu; Lei Chang; Jinwen Li; Bei Luo; Wenwen Dong; Chang Qiu; Wenbin Zhang; Yifeng Ruan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Ventralis Intermedius for Essential Tremor Using Indirect Targeting and Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Single-Institution Case Series.

Authors:  Nicholas Gravbrot; Aaron Burket; Manojkumar Saranathan; Willard S Kasoff
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04-27

3.  Neurophysiological Characterization of Thalamic Nuclei in Epileptic Anaesthetized Patients.

Authors:  Lorena Vega-Zelaya; Cristina V Torres; Marta Navas; Jesús Pastor
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-07

4.  Which one is the superior target? A comparison and pooled analysis between posterior subthalamic area and ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  Houyou Fan; Yutong Bai; Zixiao Yin; Qi An; Yichen Xu; Yuan Gao; Fangang Meng; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Comparative evaluation of tractography-based direct targeting and atlas-based indirect targeting of the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus in MRgFUS thalamotomy.

Authors:  Federico Bruno; Alessia Catalucci; Marco Varrassi; Francesco Arrigoni; Patrizia Sucapane; Davide Cerone; Francesca Pistoia; Silvia Torlone; Emanuele Tommasino; Luca De Santis; Antonio Barile; Alessandro Ricci; Carmine Marini; Alessandra Splendiani; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.