Literature DB >> 29027586

Computational simulation study on ilio-sacral screw fixations for pelvic ring injuries and implications in Asian sacrum.

Chang-Soo Chon1, Jin-Hoon Jeong2, Bokku Kang1, Han Sung Kim1, Gu-Hee Jung3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite a high possibility of technique-related complications, ilio-sacral (IS) screw fixation is the mainstay of operative management in posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aimed to make IS screw trajectory with fully intraosseous path that was optimal and consistent, and confirm the possibility of transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screw fixation in Asian sacrum.
METHODS: Eighty-two cadaveric sacra (42 males and 40 females) were enrolled and underwent continuous 1.0-mm slice computed tomography (CT) scans. CT images were imported into Mimics® software to reconstruct three-dimensional model of the pelvis. To simulate IS screws, we inserted 7.0-mm-sized TITS cylinder for first (S1) and second (S2) sacral segment and 7.0-mm oblique cylinder for S1. TITS cylinder could not be inserted into S1 of 14 models (sacral variation models) but could be inserted into the S2 of all models. The actual length of virtual IS screws was measured, and anatomic features of safe zone (SZS2) including the area, horizontal distance (HDS2), and vertical distance (VDS2) were evaluated by the possibility of TITS screw fixation in the S1.
RESULTS: When the oblique cylinder was directed toward the opposite upper corner of S1 at the level of the first foramen, there was no cortical violation regardless of sacral variation. The average length of TITS cylinder was 152.3 mm (range 127.9-178.2 mm) in S1 and 136.0 mm (range 97.8-164.1 mm) in S2, and for oblique cylinder it was 99.2 mm (range 82.4-132.2 mm). The average VDS2, HDS2, and the area of SZS2 were 15.5 mm (range 8.7-24.4 mm), 18.3 mm (range 12.7-26.6 mm), and 221.1 mm2 (range 91.1-386.7 mm2), respectively. The VDS2 and SZS2 of sacral variation were significantly higher than those of normal (both p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high variability of the S1, it is better to direct the IS screw trajectory toward the opposite upper corner of the S1 at the level of first sacral foramen. If a TITS screw is needed, the transverse fixation for the S2 could be performed alternatively due to its sufficient osseous site even in Asian sacrum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ilio-sacral screw fixation; Pelvic ring injury; Safe zone; Three-dimensional modeling; Transiliac–transsacral screw fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29027586     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2061-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  26 in total

1.  Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the "vestibule" concept.

Authors:  D A Carlson; D K Scheid; D C Maar; J R Baele; D M Kaehr
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Christiaan Mamczak; Martin Tynan; Philipp Streubel; Michael Gardner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Radiographic quantification and analysis of dysmorphic upper sacral osseous anatomy and associated iliosacral screw insertions.

Authors:  Joseph M Conflitti; Matt L Graves; M L Chip Routt
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  The effect of C-arm malrotation on iliosacral screw placement.

Authors:  Philip Wolinsky; Mark Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Morphologic considerations of the first sacral pedicle for iliosacral screw placement.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; A Biyani; M C Nadaud
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Do Transsacral-transiliac Screws Across Uninjured Sacroiliac Joints Affect Pain and Functional Outcomes in Trauma Patients?

Authors:  John Heydemann; Braden Hartline; Mary Elizabeth Gibson; Catherine G Ambrose; John W Munz; Matthew Galpin; Timothy S Achor; Joshua L Gary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  G P Konin; D M Walz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Trans iliac-sacral-iliac bar stabilisation to treat bilateral lesions of the sacro-iliac joint or sacrum: anatomical considerations and clinical experience.

Authors:  P Vanderschot; C Meuleman; A Lefèvre; P Broos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint disruptions with CT-controlled guidewires performed by interventionalists: single center experience in treating posterior pelvic instability.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Thomas J Vogl; Ingo Marzi; Stephan Zangos; Julian L Wichmann; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Martin G Mack; Sven Schmidt; Katrin Eichler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 10.  Malposition and revision rates of different imaging modalities for percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation following pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jörn Zwingmann; Oliver Hauschild; Gerrit Bode; Norbert P Südkamp; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  3 in total

1.  Anatomical considerations of safe drilling corridor upper sacral segment screw insertion.

Authors:  Hassan Bagheri; Figen Govsa
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-03

2.  Achievable pin spanning angulation in anterosuperior pelvic external fixation.

Authors:  Benjamin Young; Drayton Daily; Clarence Kee; Kevin Perry; Massimo Max Morandi; R Shane Barton; Giovanni F Solitro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-05-01

3.  Computational analysis on the feasibility of transverse iliosacral screw fixation for different sacral segments.

Authors:  Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Shilun Li; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang; Zhiyong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.