| Literature DB >> 29027151 |
Jean R N Haler1, Philippe Massonnet2, Fabien Chirot3, Christopher Kune2, Clothilde Comby-Zerbino4, Jan Jordens5, Maarten Honing5, Ynze Mengerink5, Johann Far2, Philippe Dugourd4, Edwin De Pauw2.
Abstract
Over the years, polymer analyses using ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) measurements have been performed on different ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) setups. In order to be able to compare literature data taken on different IM(-MS) instruments, ion heating and ion temperature evaluations have already been explored. Nevertheless, extrapolations to other analytes are difficult and thus straightforward same-sample instrument comparisons seem to be the only reliable way to make sure that the different IM(-MS) setups do not greatly change the gas-phase behavior. We used a large range of degrees of polymerization (DP) of poly(ethylene oxide) PEO homopolymers to measure IMS drift times on three different IM-MS setups: a homemade drift tube (DT), a trapped (TIMS), and a traveling wave (T-Wave) IMS setup. The drift time evolutions were followed for increasing polymer DPs (masses) and charge states, and they are found to be comparable and reproducible on the three instruments. ᅟ.Entities:
Keywords: Drift tube; Ion mobility; Mass spectrometry; Poly (ethylene oxide); Synthetic polymers; TIMS; Traveling wave
Year: 2017 PMID: 29027151 DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1822-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom ISSN: 1044-0305 Impact factor: 3.109