Literature DB >> 29026929

The outcome of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: redefining treatment strategies.

P Monteban1, J van den Berg2, J van Hees2, S Nijs1,3, H Hoekstra4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimize the treatment strategy and reduce treatment costs of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, clinical and patient-reported outcome, and its determinants were addressed.
METHODS: A retrospective adult cohort study including 152 proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: 121 nonoperatively and 31 operatively treated. In the operative group, 21 were zone 1 and 10 zone 2 fractures. Median follow-up was 37.5 (IQR 20.8-52.3) months with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. Twenty-three demographic, fracture, and treatment characteristics were assessed as well as the healthcare costs. Outcome was assessed using the patient files, anterior-posterior and oblique X-rays, foot function index (FFI), visual analog score (VAS), and SF-36 questionnaires.
RESULTS: The median FFI, physical SF-36, and VAS scores did not significantly differ between nonoperatively and operatively treated patients. The FFI and physical SF-36 were predominantly affected by a history of mobility impairment and pre-existent cardiovascular diseases, whereas mental SF-36 correlated significantly with higher ASA-score. Overall complication rate was 5.9% (4.1 vs. 12.9%; p = 0.065, nonoperative vs. operative, respectively). Nonunion was recorded in only one (nonoperatively) treated patient. The total healthcare costs for operative treatment were 4.2 times higher compared to nonoperative treatment (€1960 vs. €463 per patient, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Overall, the clinical and patient-reported outcome was good. The foot function and quality of life were mainly affected by comorbidity, rather than fracture and treatment-related variables. Although nonoperatively treated patients indicated decreased mental quality of life, our study indicates that proximal fifth metatarsal fractures can safely be treated nonoperatively without the risk of nonunion, with fewer complications and lower healthcare costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costing; Fractures; Management; Metatarsal; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026929     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0863-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  24 in total

1.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability.

Authors:  E Budiman-Mak; K J Conrad; K E Roach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  The intraosseous and extraosseous vascular supply of the fifth metatarsal: implications for fifth metatarsal osteotomy.

Authors:  Kathleen E McKeon; Jeffrey E Johnson; Jeremy J McCormick; Sandra E Klein
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  [Early functional treatment of a 5th metatarsal fracture using an orthopedic boot].

Authors:  A Gösele; J Schulenburg; P E Ochsner
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  1997

5.  Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice.

Authors:  Kurt F Konkel; Andrea G Menger; Sharon A Retzlaff
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Authors:  Andrew C Gray; Brian P Rooney; Roland Ingram
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2008-05-19

Review 7.  Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal.

Authors:  S J Lawrence; M J Botte
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug

8.  Health Care Usage and Related Costs in Fibular Plating for AO Type 44-B Ankle Fractures in a Belgian University Hospital: An Exploratory Analysis.

Authors:  Bart Smeets; Stefaan Nijs; Meri Nderlita; Cindy Vandoren; Harm Hoekstra
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  A study of metatarsal fractures in children.

Authors:  R J Owen; F G Hickey; D B Finlay
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  The Jones fracture revisited.

Authors:  J H Kavanaugh; T D Brower; R V Mann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

1.  What Is the Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Lawrence and Botte Classification System of Fifth Metatarsal Base Fractures?

Authors:  Naudereh Noori; Mostafa Abousayed; Gregory P Guyton; Michelle M Coleman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Comparative outcomes of foot cast and short leg cast in pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: a single blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Kanakij Mutthakalin; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Adequate union rates for the treatment of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures.

Authors:  Q G H Rikken; J Dahmen; N C Hagemeijer; I N Sierevelt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Functional outcome of 103 fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone.

Authors:  Patrick Pflüger; Michael Zyskowski; Michael Müller; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  [Functional outcome of 111 metatarsal fractures following conservative in comparison to operative treatment].

Authors:  Patrick Pflüger; Michael Zyskowski; Christopher Völk; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.