Literature DB >> 2902644

Is stimulation of both D1 and D2 receptors necessary for the expression of dopamine-mediated behaviors?

F J White1, L M Bednarz, S R Wachtel, S Hjorth, R J Brooderson.   

Abstract

Recent electrophysiological findings have indicated that D1 dopamine (DA) receptor stimulation by SKF 38393 enables the inhibitory effects of the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole on nucleus accumbens neurons. In the present study, a similar interaction was shown for quinpirole-induced stereotyped behaviors. In control rats, SKF 38393 enhanced the stereotyped responses induced by quinpirole, converting lower-level stereotypies (sniffing and rearing) to more intense oral behaviors (licking and gnawing). In rats depleted of DA (79% reduction) by the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT), the behavioral effects of quinpirole were abolished. However, quinpirole-induced stereotyped responses were reinstated by SKF 38393 suggesting that D1 receptor stimulation by endogenous DA is necessary for D2 receptor-mediated stereotyped responses (sniffing, rearing). In support of this suggestion, stereotyped behaviors produced by the non-selective D1/D2 agonist apomorphine were not affected by AMPT pretreatment. In contrast to the effects of quinpirole, the ability of SKF 38393 to induce grooming responses was not abolished by AMPT pretreatment or by combined pretreatment with AMPT and reserpine (greater than 99% DA depletion). These results indicate that D1 receptor stimulation enables D2 receptor-mediated stereotyped responses, but that this relationship is not reciprocal since D2 receptor stimulation is not necessary for the grooming response elicited by SKF 38393.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2902644     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90442-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  34 in total

1.  Psychopharmacological responsiveness to the dopamine agonist quinpirole in normal weanlings and in weanling offspring exposed gestationally to cocaine.

Authors:  C A Moody; N A Frambes; L P Spear
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Ontogenetic differences in the psychopharmacological responses to separate and combined stimulation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors during the neonatal to weanling age period.

Authors:  C A Moody; L P Spear
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Dopaminergic control of locomotion, mouthing, snout contact, and grooming: opposing roles of D1 and D2 receptors.

Authors:  D Eilam; H Talangbayan; G Canaran; H Szechtman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Biphasic locomotor effects of the dopamine D1 agonist SKF 38393 and their attenuation in non-habituated mice.

Authors:  E Tirelli; P Terry
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Behavioral effects of selective and nonselective dopamine agonists on young rats after irreversible antagonism of D1 and/or D2 receptors.

Authors:  S A McDougall; C A Crawford; A J Nonneman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Dopamine antagonist effects on locomotor activity in naive and ethanol-treated FAST and SLOW selected lines of mice.

Authors:  E H Shen; J C Crabbe; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Striatal Fos expression is indicative of dopamine D1/D2 synergism and receptor supersensitivity.

Authors:  G J LaHoste; J Yu; J F Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of acute dopamine depletion on responsiveness to D1 and D2 receptor agonists in infant and weanling rat pups.

Authors:  C A Moody; L P Spear
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Morphine withdrawal aggression: modification with D1 and D2 receptor agonists.

Authors:  J W Tidey; K A Miczek
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Dopamine receptor loss of function is not protective of rd1 rod photoreceptors in vivo.

Authors:  Judith Mosinger Ogilvie; Angela M Hakenewerth; Rachel R Gardner; Joshua G Martak; Virginia M Maggio
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.