| Literature DB >> 29026410 |
Ali Khaledifar1, Marzeih Nasiri2, Borzoo Khaledifar3, Arsalan Khaledifar2, Ali Mokhtari4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complementary medicine interventions are now successfully used to reduce stress as well as to stabilize hemodynamic indices within different procedures. The present study aimed to examine the effect of massage therapy and reflexotherapy on reducing stress in patients before coronary angiography.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary Angiography; Emotional Stress; Massage Therapy; Reflexotherapy; Vital Signs
Year: 2017 PMID: 29026410 PMCID: PMC5628851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ARYA Atheroscler ISSN: 1735-3955
Baseline characteristics of the study participants stratified by intervention group
| Characteristics | Reflexotherapy | Massage therapy | Routine method | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 67.2 ± 11.8 | 67.0 ± 11.1 | 64.7 ± 12.1 | 0.702 |
| Disease duration (year) | 4 (1.5-8.5) | 3 (1.0-4.0) | 4 (1.5-5.0) | 0.273 |
| Gender [n (%)] | 0.215 | |||
| Male | 9 (36.0) | 14 (56.0) | 15 (60.0) | |
| Female | 16 (64.0) | 11 (44.0) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Occupation state [n (%)] | 0.057 | |||
| Housekeeper | 14 (56.0) | 11 (44.0) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Self-employed | 3 (12.0) | 12 (48.0) | 8 (32.0) | |
| Employed | 2 (8.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (8.0) | |
| Retired | 6 (24.0) | 2 (8.0) | 5 (20.0) | |
| Education level | 0.073 | |||
| Illiterate | 17 (68.0) | 14 (56.0) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Sub-diploma | 3 (12.0) | 9 (36.0) | 12 (48.0) | |
| Diploma | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.0) | 2 (8.0) | |
| College degree | 2 (12.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.0) |
Analysis of variance and chi-square test were used; P-values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant
Tukey's post hoc analysis was used
The difference in the vital signs before and after study interventions
| Characteristics | Reflexotherapy | Massage therapy | Control group | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic blood pressure | Before intervention | 144.40 ± 27.60 | 140.80 ± 16.00 | 132.60 ± 16.70 | 0.129 |
| After intervention | 139.60 ± 26.40 | 137.80 ± 15.20 | 132.60 ± 16.40 | 0.443 | |
| Difference | 4.80 ± 3.67 | 3.00 ± 3.22 | 0.00 ± 1.44 | < 0.001 | |
| P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | > 0.999 | ||
| Diastolic blood pressure | Before intervention | 86.60 ± 13.50 | 76.40 ± 12.10 | 77.80 ± 8.20 | 0.005 |
| After intervention | 82.40 ± 13.00 | 75.40 ± 11.30 | 76.60 ± 8.38 | 0.064 | |
| Difference | 4.20 ± 5.89 | 1.00 ± 2.88 | 1.20 ± 3.61 | 0.017 | |
| P | 0.002 | 0.096 | 0.110 | ||
| Temperature | Before intervention | 36.90 ± 0.27 | 36.90 ± 0.22 | 37.00 ± 0.14 | 0.068 |
| After intervention | 36.80 ± 0.26 | 36.80 ± 0.22 | 37.00 ± 0.15 | 0.008 | |
| Difference | 0.70 ± 0.13 | 0.06 ± 0.11 | 0.02 ± 0.21 | 0.543 | |
| P | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.574 | ||
| Respiratory rate | Before intervention | 20.80 ± 2.10 | 20.10 ± 1.90 | 18.20 ± 0.80 | 0.608 |
| After intervention | 18.60 ± 1.40 | 18.50 ± 1.30 | 18.20 ± 0.80 | < 0.001 | |
| Difference | -2.30 ± 1.30 | -1.60 ± 1.10 | -0.04 ± 0.90 | < 0.001 | |
| P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.824 | ||
| Heart rate | Before intervention | 82.40 ± 4.70 | 79.80 ± 4.40 | 78.20 ± 5.50 | 0.013 |
| After intervention | 76.20 ± 4.80 | 75.00 ± 4.30 | 77.80 ± 5.50 | 0.163 | |
| Difference | 6.30 ± 2.56 | 4.76 ± 2.79 | 0.40 ± 2.50 | < 0.001 | |
| P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.438 | ||
| Stress | Before intervention | 60.60 ± 7.20 | 51.40 ± 6.80 | 47.80 ± 9.60 | < 0.001 |
| After intervention | 34.70 ± 4.70 | 39.70 ± 4.80 | 46.50 ± 9.20 | < 0.001 | |
| Difference | 25.90 ± 5.94 | 11.70 ± 5.00 | 1.40 ± 1.80 | < 0.001 | |
| P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.438 |
P-values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant;
Figure 1Consort chart for the study