Literature DB >> 29026377

Developmental screening: predictors of follow-up adherence in primary health care.

Joanné Christine Schoeman1, De Wet Swanepoel1,2,3, Jeannie van der Linde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of early identification for infants and young children with developmental delays is well established. Poor follow-up on referrals, however, undermines the effectiveness of early intervention programmes.
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors, including text message reminders, that influence follow-up adherence for early intervention after developmental screening in primary health care. A secondary objective surveyed reasons for follow-up default.
METHODS: The PEDS tools were used to screen 247 high-risk children. A risk assessment questionnaire was completed with caregivers whose children were referred for speech-language and/or occupational therapy (n=106, 43%). A quasi-experimental correlational study was employed to identify risk factors for defaulting on appointments. A thematic analysis of telephonic interviews was also employed to determine reasons for follow-up defaults.
RESULTS: Follow-up adherence was 17%. Participants who were never married, divorced or widowed were 2.88 times more likely to attend a follow-up appointment than those who were married or living together (95%, CI 0.97-8.63). Text message reminders did not improve follow-up. More than half (58%) of participants who defaulted on appontments could be reached for telephonic interviews. Interviews showed that 87% of participants were unconcerned about their child's development. Other reasons for defaulting were employment, logistical issues, other responsibilities and forgetfulness.
CONCLUSION: Follow-up adherence for early intervention services following a positive primary health care screen was poor. Increased awareness and education regarding the importance of development for educational success is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental screening; PEDS tools; follow-up return rate; occupational therapy; primary health care; speech-language therapy; text message reminders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026377      PMCID: PMC5636228          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v17i1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  27 in total

1.  Screening for developmental and behavioral problems.

Authors:  Frances Page Glascoe
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2005

2.  PEDS: developmental milestones--an accurate brief tool for surveillance and screening.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Frances Page Glascoe; Nicholas S Robertshaw
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.168

3.  Why parents refuse newborn hearing screening and default on follow-up rescreening--a South African perspective.

Authors:  Lucia Jane Scheepers; De Wet Swanepoel; Talita le Roux
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Role of reminder by text message in enhancing postnatal clinic attendance.

Authors:  Abiodun Idowu Adanikin; Jacob Olumuyiwa Awoleke; Adewale Adeyiolu
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at Neonatal Follow-Up programmes.

Authors:  M Ballantyne; B Stevens; A Guttmann; A R Willan; P Rosenbaum
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.508

6.  Efficacy of a community-based infant hearing screening program utilizing existing clinic personnel in Western Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Niki Friderichs; DeWet Swanepoel; James W Hall
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 7.  Missed opportunities in surveillance and screening systems to detect developmental delay: A developing country perspective.

Authors:  Zarmeneh Aly; Fawad Taj; Shahnaz Ibrahim
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Using linked data to assess patterns of early intervention (EI) referral among very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Wanda D Barfield; Karen M Clements; Kimberly G Lee; Milton Kotelchuck; Nancy Wilber; Paul H Wise
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-12

9.  Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children.

Authors:  Steven A Rosenberg; Duan Zhang; Cordelia C Robinson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Mobile phones improve antenatal care attendance in Zanzibar: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stine Lund; Birgitte B Nielsen; Maryam Hemed; Ida M Boas; Azzah Said; Khadija Said; Mkoko H Makungu; Vibeke Rasch
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Nerissa S Bauer; Chandan Saha; Susan Ofner; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.