Literature DB >> 29026355

Colistin and Polymyxin B Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations Determined by Etest Found Unreliable for Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Shelby Simar1, Diane Sibley1, Deborah Ashcraft1, George Pankey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A reliable method of polymyxin B and E (colistin) susceptibility testing remains elusive. These drugs diffuse poorly into agar, creating potentially inaccurate Etest and disk diffusion results, and testing by these methods is not recommended. Broth microdilution is the reference testing method, although it can be sometimes difficult to interpret. Currently, when a colistin susceptibility test is ordered for a patient in the Ochsner Health System, our diagnostic microbiology laboratory performs the Etest. As an in-house quality assessment project, we compared colistin and polymyxin B minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by Etest with MICs determined by broth microdilution to evaluate whether colistin MICs are accurately being reported by Etest.
METHODS: A total of 143 nonduplicate clinical isolates from Ochsner patients during 2015-2016 were tested: Acinetobacter baumannii (n=60), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=44), and Enterobacteriaceae (n=39) (13 Escherichia coli, 15 Klebsiella spp, and 11 Enterobacter spp). Colistin and polymyxin B MICs were determined by Etest and broth microdilution.
RESULTS: Using broth microdilution, 16/143 (11%) isolates were nonsusceptible to colistin, and 12/143 (8%) were nonsusceptible to polymyxin B. With Etest, 4/143 (3%) isolates were nonsusceptible to colistin, and 7/143 (5%) were nonsusceptible to polymyxin B. Essential agreement of colistin and polymyxin B MICs between broth microdilution and Etest was 84/143 (59%) and 87/143 (61%), respectively. Categorical agreement for colistin and polymyxin B was 127/143 (89%) and 126/143 (88%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of discrepancy between colistin and polymyxin B Etest and broth microdilution MICs. Very major errors (colistin/polymyxin B-susceptible by Etest, colistin/polymyxin B-resistant by broth microdilution) were detected in 10% of isolates tested with colistin and 8% of polymyxin B-tested isolates. The data from this study confirm that broth microdilution should be performed for susceptibility testing of polymyxins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colistin; gram-negative bacteria; polymyxin B

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026355      PMCID: PMC5625981     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ochsner J        ISSN: 1524-5012


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin.

Authors:  T Y Tan; S Y Ng
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility Testing Methods among Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Konstantina Dafopoulou; Olympia Zarkotou; Evangelia Dimitroulia; Christos Hadjichristodoulou; Vasiliki Gennimata; Spyros Pournaras; Athanasios Tsakris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Colistin MIC variability by method for contemporary clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Janet A Hindler; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Irreproducible and uninterpretable Polymyxin B MICs for Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  David Landman; Julius Salamera; John Quale
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  The rise and spread of mcr plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance.

Authors:  Sue C Nang; Jian Li; Tony Velkov
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 7.624

2.  Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam in combination with other classes of antibacterial agents against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa-the EM200 study.

Authors:  J Belkhair; S Nachat; S Rouhi; H Ouassif; S Abbassi; N Soraa
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Analysis of colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and XDR Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Raunak Bir; Hitender Gautam; Nazneen Arif; Priyanka Chakravarti; Jyoti Verma; Sayantan Banerjee; Sonu Tyagi; Sarita Mohapatra; Seema Sood; Benu Dhawan; Rama Chaudhry; Arti Kapil; Bimal Kumar Das; Bhabatosh Das
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-26

4.  Determination of Colistin Resistance by Simple Disk Diffusion Test Using Modified Mueller-Hinton Agar.

Authors:  Jean Damascene Uwizeyimana; Daewon Kim; Hyunsook Lee; Jung Hyun Byun; Dongeun Yong
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  A Novel Lipid-Based MALDI-TOF Assay for the Rapid Detection of Colistin-Resistant Enterobacter Species.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Christi L McElheny; Jerilyn R Izac; Francesca M Gardner; Courtney E Chandler; David R Goodlett; Yohei Doi; J Kristie Johnson; Robert K Ernst
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.