Literature DB >> 29025679

Relation of Residual Mitral Regurgitation Despite Elevated Mitral Gradients to Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization After MitraClip Repair.

Richard Cheng1, Sam Dawkins1, Emily Tat1, Moody Makar2, Asma Hussaini1, Raj R Makkar1, Alfredo Trento3, Robert J Siegel1, Saibal Kar4.   

Abstract

Achieving minimal residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after percutaneous MitraClip repair is limited by iatrogenic mitral stenosis. It is unknown whether allowing moderately elevated postprocedural mean mitral gradients (MMGs) to achieve < moderate residual MR is preferable to moderate residual regurgitation. Patients with less-than-moderate residual MR but a MMG of ≥5 mm Hg (Group 1) were compared with patients with moderate residual MR (Group 2). The primary end point was heart failure hospitalization. Secondary end points included mortality, subsequent mitral valve surgery, and MR at 1 year. Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. Group 1 included 48 patients (median MMG 6, interquartile range 5-6 mm Hg). Group 2 included 30 patients (median MMG 3.5, interquartile range 2-5 mm Hg). Age, baseline MR severity, and type of MR were not different between groups. Freedom from heart failure hospitalization at 1 year was 91.2 ± 4.2% in Group 1 versus 70.8 ± 8.7% in Group 2 (p = 0.021). Achieved differences in MR reduction between groups persisted at 1 year (p = 0.007). Survival was not different (p = 0.402), and subsequent mitral valve surgery occurred in 4 of 48 (8%) and in 4 of 30 patients (13%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.476). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, less-than-moderate residual MR, despite moderately elevated mitral gradients, was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.96) for subsequent heart failure hospitalization (p = 0.044). In conclusion, patients with less-than-moderate residual MR despite a MMG of ≥5 had a 79% reduction in hazard for subsequent heart failure hospitalization compared with patients with moderate residual MR.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29025679     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapy: Defining the Patient Who Will Benefit.

Authors:  Marvin H Eng; Dee Dee Wang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Prognostic Impact of Left Atrial Function Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors:  Jakob Ledwoch; Katharina Leidgschwendner; Carmen Fellner; Felix Poch; Ida Olbrich; Ruth Thalmann; Hans Kossmann; Michael Dommasch; Ralf Dirschinger; Anja Stundl; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Christian Kupatt; Petra Hoppmann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient Is Predictive of Long-Term Outcome After Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation ( MR ), But Not in Functional MR.

Authors:  Johannes Patzelt; Wenzhong Zhang; Reinhard Sauter; Matthias Mezger; Henry Nording; Miriam Ulrich; Annika Becker; Tara Patzelt; Volker Rudolph; Ingo Eitel; Mohammed Saad; Fabian Bamberg; Christian Schlensak; Meinrad Gawaz; Peter Boekstegers; Juergen Schreieck; Peter Seizer; Harald F Langer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  A Comprehensive Engineering Analysis of Left Heart Dynamics After MitraClip in a Functional Mitral Regurgitation Patient.

Authors:  Andrés Caballero; Wenbin Mao; Raymond McKay; Rebecca T Hahn; Wei Sun
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Role of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair-A Mini Review.

Authors:  Kensuke Hirasawa; Masaki Izumo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.