Literature DB >> 29025081

The long-term effects of early oral feeding following minimal invasive esophagectomy.

G H K Berkelmans1, L Fransen1, T J Weijs2, M Lubbers3, G A P Nieuwenhuijzen1, J P Ruurda2, E A Kouwenhoven3, M J van Det3, C Rosman4, R van Hillegersberg2, M D P Luyer1.   

Abstract

A nil-by-mouth regime with enteral nutrition via an artificial route is frequently applied following esophagectomy. However, early initiation of oral feeding could potentially improve recovery and has shown to be beneficial in many types of abdominal surgery. Although short-term nutritional safety of oral intake after an esophagectomy has been documented, long-term effects of this feeding regimen are unknown. In this cohort study, data from patients undergoing minimal invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between 04-2012 and 09-2015 in three centers in Netherlands were collected. Patients in the oral feeding group were retrieved from a previous prospective study and compared with a cohort of patients with early enteral jejunostomy feeding but delayed oral intake. Body mass index (BMI) measurements, complications, and nutritional re-interventions (re- or start of artificial feeding, start of total parenteral nutrition) were gathered over the course of one year after surgery. One year after surgery the median BMI was 22.8 kg/m2 and weight loss was 7.0 kg (9.5%) in 114 patients. Patients in the early oral feeding group lost more weight during the first postoperative month (P = 0.004). However, in the months thereafter this difference was not observed anymore. In the early oral feeding group, 28 patients (56%) required a nutritional re-intervention, compared to 46 patients (72%) in the delayed oral feeding group (P = 0.078). During admission, more re-interventions were performed in the delayed oral feeding group (17 vs. 46 patients P < 0.001). Esophagectomy reduces BMI in the first year after surgery regardless of the feeding regimen. Direct start of oral intake following esophagectomy has no impact on early nutritional re-interventions and long-term weight loss.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; esophagectomy; nutrition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29025081     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  5 in total

1.  Early oral intake through meticulous chewing after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ian Wong; Simon Law
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Safety analysis of early oral feeding after esophagectomy in patients complicated with diabetes.

Authors:  Zhisheng Jiang; Jing Luo; Mengqing Xu; Zhuangzhuang Cong; Saiguang Ji; Yifei Diao; Yang Xu; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Role of intraoperative feeding jejunostomy in esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Min Soo Kim; Sumin Shin; Hong Kwan Kim; Yong Soo Choi; Jae Il Zo; Young Mog Shim; Jong Ho Cho
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Tomonari Suetsugu; Takeharu Imai; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Kazuya Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-05-28

Review 5.  Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard Zheng; Courtney L Devin; Michael J Pucci; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.