Literature DB >> 29024868

Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors.

Linda Martin1, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal2, Marjon A de Boer3, Meredith Vanstone4, Lidewij Henneman5.   

Abstract

In 2014, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 was added to the Dutch prenatal screening program as part of the TRIDENT study. Most (85%) pregnant Dutch women are counselled for prenatal aneuploidy screening by primary care midwives. This will remain when NIPT is implemented as a first-tier screening test. We therefore investigated midwife counsellors': 1) Knowledge about NIPT; 2) Attitudes towards NIPT as first-tier screening test; and 3) Experiences with informing clients about NIPT. Between April-June 2015, an online questionnaire to assess knowledge about NIPT, attitudes towards NIPT, and experiences with NIPT was completed by 436 Dutch primary care midwives. We found that 59% midwives answered ≥7 of 8 knowledge questions correctly. Continuing professional education attendance and more positive attitudes towards prenatal screening for Down syndrome were positively associated with the total knowledge score (β = 0.261; p = 0.007 and β = 0.204; p = 0.015, respectively). The majority (67%) were in favor of replacing First trimester Combined Test with NIPT, although 41% preferred to maintain a nuchal translucency measurement alongside NIPT. We conclude that midwives demonstrated solid knowledge about NIPT that may still be improved in some areas. Dutch midwives overwhelmingly support the integration of NIPT as a first-tier screening test.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29024868     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

1.  Nationwide implementation of the non-invasive prenatal test: Evaluation of a blended learning program for counselors.

Authors:  Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Caroline J Bax; Mijntje J Pieters; Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink-Verheij; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Counselling for prenatal anomaly screening to migrant women in the Netherlands: An interview study of primary care midwives' perceived barriers with client-midwife communication.

Authors:  Isabel Koopmanschap; Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Jeanine Suurmond
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Obstetrical provider knowledge and attitudes towards cell-free DNA screening: results of a cross-sectional national survey.

Authors:  Wilson V Chan; Jo-Ann Johnson; R Douglas Wilson; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal served as a first-tier screening test for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidy in a pilot city in China.

Authors:  Yanhui Liu; Hailiang Liu; Yi He; Wanfang Xu; Qiulin Ma; Yuzhen He; Wei Lei; Guoquan Chen; Zheng He; Jiayi Huang; Jianan Liu; Yuanru Liu; Quanfei Huang; Fubing Yu
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.639

5.  Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers.

Authors:  Olivia Miu Yung Ngan; Huso Yi; Shenaz Ahmed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.