Literature DB >> 29024234

Vicariously touching products through observing others' hand actions increases purchasing intention, and the effect of visual perspective in this process: An fMRI study.

Yi Liu1, Xuelian Zang1,2, Lihan Chen3, Leonardo Assumpção2, Hong Li1,4.   

Abstract

The growth of online shopping increases consumers' dependence on vicarious sensory experiences, such as observing others touching products in commercials. However, empirical evidence on whether observing others' sensory experiences increases purchasing intention is still scarce. In the present study, participants observed others interacting with products in the first- or third-person perspective in video clips, and their neural responses were measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We investigated (1) whether and how vicariously touching certain products affected purchasing intention, and the neural correlates of this process; and (2) how visual perspective interacts with vicarious tactility. Vicarious tactile experiences were manipulated by hand actions touching or not touching the products, while the visual perspective was manipulated by showing the hand actions either in first- or third-person perspective. During the fMRI scanning, participants watched the video clips and rated their purchasing intention for each product. The results showed that, observing others touching (vs. not touching) the products increased purchasing intention, with vicarious neural responses found in mirror neuron systems (MNS) and lateral occipital complex (LOC). Moreover, the stronger neural activities in MNS was associated with higher purchasing intention. The effects of visual perspectives were found in left superior parietal lobule (SPL), while the interaction of tactility and visual perspective was shown in precuneus and precuneus-LOC connectivity. The present study provides the first evidence that vicariously touching a given product increased purchasing intention and the neural activities in bilateral MNS, LOC, left SPL and precuneus are involved in this process. Hum Brain Mapp 39:332-343, 2018.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; mirror neuron system; purchasing intention; vicarious experience; visual perspective

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29024234      PMCID: PMC6866361          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  38 in total

1.  Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Shy Shoham; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations.

Authors:  Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Bodily selves in relation: embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Influence of brand personality-marker attributes on purchasing intention: the role of emotionality.

Authors:  Gianluigi Guido; Alessandro M Peluso; Mariarosaria Provenzano
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2010-06

8.  Dissociating object directed and non-object directed action in the human mirror system; implications for theories of motor simulation.

Authors:  Zarinah K Agnew; Richard J S Wise; Robert Leech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data.

Authors:  Valeria Gazzola; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The influence of visual perspective on the somatosensory steady-state response during pain observation.

Authors:  Dora L Canizales; Julien I A Voisin; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Marc-André Roy; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.