David M Kaye1, Frank E Silvestry2, Finn Gustafsson3, John G Cleland4, Dirk J van Veldhuisen5, Piotr Ponikowski6, Jan Komtebedde7, Shane Nanayakkara1, Dan Burkhoff8, Sanjiv J Shah9. 1. Alfred Hospital and Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. National Heart & Lung Institute, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK. 5. Cardiology Department, UMCG, Groningen, Netherlands. 6. Fourth Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland. 7. Corvia Medical, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 9. Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are becoming the most prevalent forms of heart failure. Patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF in atrial fibrillation (AF) have poorer survival and quality of life, but the mechanism underpinning this is unknown. We sought to investigate the influence of AF on the haemodynamic profile of HFpEF/HFmrEF patients at rest and during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: We invasively measured central haemodynamics at rest and during symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise in HFpEF/HFmrEF patients, 35 in sinus rhythm and 20 in AF with matched left ventricular ejection fraction. At rest, AF patients had significantly increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, lower cardiac index and reduced left ventricular stroke work index, despite similar resting heart rate. Under resting conditions, calculated oxygen consumption and systemic arteriovenous oxygen gradient were not different between the two groups. During supine cycling at similar levels of workload, AF patients exhibited a reduced capacity to increase their oxygen consumption and this was accompanied by a persistently impaired cardiac index and left ventricular stroke work index. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse interaction of AF and HFpEF/HFmrEF may be accounted for by an adverse impact on left ventricular systolic function and peripheral oxygen kinetics.
AIMS: Heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) are becoming the most prevalent forms of heart failure. Patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF in atrial fibrillation (AF) have poorer survival and quality of life, but the mechanism underpinning this is unknown. We sought to investigate the influence of AF on the haemodynamic profile of HFpEF/HFmrEF patients at rest and during exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: We invasively measured central haemodynamics at rest and during symptom-limited supine bicycle exercise in HFpEF/HFmrEF patients, 35 in sinus rhythm and 20 in AF with matched left ventricular ejection fraction. At rest, AFpatients had significantly increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, lower cardiac index and reduced left ventricular stroke work index, despite similar resting heart rate. Under resting conditions, calculated oxygen consumption and systemic arteriovenousoxygen gradient were not different between the two groups. During supine cycling at similar levels of workload, AFpatients exhibited a reduced capacity to increase their oxygen consumption and this was accompanied by a persistently impaired cardiac index and left ventricular stroke work index. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse interaction of AF and HFpEF/HFmrEF may be accounted for by an adverse impact on left ventricular systolic function and peripheral oxygen kinetics.
Authors: Stephen M Ratchford; Heather L Clifton; D Taylor La Salle; Ryan M Broxterman; Joshua F Lee; John J Ryan; Paul N Hopkins; Josephine B Wright; Joel D Trinity; Russell S Richardson; D Walter Wray Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-09-17
Authors: Anna R Hemnes; Alexander R Opotowsky; Tufik R Assad; Meng Xu; Laura N Doss; Eric Farber-Eger; Quinn S Wells; Evan L Brittain Journal: Chest Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Frederik H Verbrugge; Grace Lin; Barry A Borlaug Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nebojša M Mujović; Milan M Marinković; Ivana Nedeljković; Nebojša Marković; Marko Banović; Vera Vučićević; Goran Stanković; Tatjana S Potpara Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Maximilian von Roeder; Stephan Blazek; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Guglielmo Gioia; Luise Mentzel; Julia Anna Lurz; Christian Besler; Karl Fengler; Gerhard Hindricks; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele; Philipp Lurz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 6.138
Authors: Jan M Griffin; Barry A Borlaug; Jan Komtebedde; Sheldon E Litwin; Sanjiv J Shah; David M Kaye; Elke Hoendermis; Gerd Hasenfuß; Finn Gustafsson; Emil Wolsk; Nir Uriel; Daniel Burkhoff Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 5.501