Literature DB >> 29024200

Novel automated point collection software facilitates rapid, high-density electroanatomical mapping with multiple catheter types.

Leon M Ptaszek1, Boyce Moon2, Guy Rozen1, Srijoy Mahapatra2, Moussa Mansour1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Manual, point-by-point electroanatomical mapping requires the operator to directly evaluate each point during map construction. Consequently, point collection can be a slow process. An automated 3D mapping system was developed with the goal of improving key mapping metrics, including map completion time and point density.
METHODS: Automated 3D mapping software that includes morphology and cycle length discrimination functions for surface and intracardiac electrograms was developed. In five swine, electroanatomical maps (EAMs) of all four cardiac chambers were generated in sinus rhythm. Four catheters were used: two different four-pole ablation catheters, a 20-pole circular catheter, and a 64-pole basket catheter. Automated and manual 3D mapping were compared for 12 different catheter-chamber combinations (paired sets of 10 maps for most combinations, for a total of 156 maps).
RESULTS: Automated 3D mapping produced more than twofold increase in the number of points per map, as compared with manual 3D mapping (P ≤0.007 for all catheter-chamber combinations tested). Automated 3D mapping also reduced map completion time by an average of 29% (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The amount of manual editing of the maps acquired with automated 3D mapping was minimal.
CONCLUSION: Automated 3D mapping with the open-platform mapping software described in this study is significantly faster than manual, point-by-point 3D mapping. This resulted in shorter mapping time and higher point density. The morphology discrimination functions effectively excluded ectopic beats during mapping in sinus rhythm and allowed for rapid mapping of intermittent ventricular ectopic beats.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensite mapping system; catheter ablation; computer assisted; electroanatomical mapping; image processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29024200     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Modern mapping technologies : Technical background and clinical use].

Authors:  Felix Bourier; Frédéric Sacher
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-26

2.  Automatic 3D Surface Reconstruction of the Left Atrium From Clinically Mapped Point Clouds Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Zhaohan Xiong; Martin K Stiles; Yan Yao; Rui Shi; Aaqel Nalar; Josh Hawson; Geoffrey Lee; Jichao Zhao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Successful cryoablation of ventricular extrasystoles originating from the vicinity of the left anterior fascicle.

Authors:  Takatsugu Kajiyama; Yusuke Kondo; Masahiro Nakano; Kazuo Miyazawa; Miyo Nakano; Tomohiko Hayashi; Ryo Ito; Haruhiro Takahira; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-02-06

4.  Hybrid magneto - impedance based 3-D electro-anatomical mapping in a complex case of incessant left atrial tachycardia.

Authors:  Pratik Sudhir Sane; Deep Chandh Raja; Sabari Sarvanan; Ulhas Pandurangi
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2019-09-10

5.  Performance and acute procedural outcomes of the EnSite Precision™ cardiac mapping system for electrophysiology mapping and ablation procedures: results from the EnSite Precision™ observational study.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hsu; Douglas Darden; Benedict M Glover; B Judson Colley; Christian Steinberg; Bernard Thibault; Coty Jewell; Michael Bernard; Paul B Tabereaux; Usman Siddiqui; Jingyun Li; Eric E Horvath; Daniel Cooper; David Lin
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 1.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.