Literature DB >> 29024158

Income-rich and wealth-poor? The impact of measures of socio-economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long-term care use among older people.

Ricardo Rodrigues1, Stefania Ilinca1, Andrea E Schmidt2.   

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the impact of using 2 measures of socio-economic status on the analysis of how informal care and home care use are distributed among older people living in the community. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe for 14 European countries, we estimate differences in corrected concentration indices for use of informal care and home care, using equivalised household net income and equivalised net worth (as a proxy for wealth). We also calculate horizontal inequity indices using both measures of socio-economic status and accounting for differences in need. The findings show that using wealth as a ranking variable results, as a rule, in a less pro-poor inequality of use for both informal and home care. Once differences in need are controlled for (horizontal inequity), wealth still results in a less pro-poor distribution for informal care, in comparison with income, whereas the opposite is observed for home care. Possible explanations for these differences and research and policy implications are discussed.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  income; inequality; long-term care; older people; wealth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29024158     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

1.  Eligibility or use? Disentangling the sources of horizontal inequity in home care receipt in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marianne Tenand; Pieter Bakx; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Quality of Life, Health and the Great Recession in Spain: Why Older People Matter?

Authors:  Carla Blázquez-Fernández; David Cantarero-Prieto; Marta Pascual-Sáez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  From each according to means, to each according to needs? Distributional effects of abolishing asset-based payments for residential care in Austria.

Authors:  Ricardo Rodrigues; Cassandra Simmons; Tamara Premrov; Christian Böhler; Kai Leichsenring
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-03-19

4.  Gender differences in access to community-based care: a longitudinal analysis of widowhood and living arrangements.

Authors:  Stefania Ilinca; Ricardo Rodrigues; Stefan Fors; Eszter Zólyomi; Janet Jull; Johan Rehnberg; Afshin Vafaei; Susan Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Gender Disparity and the Association Between Socioeconomic Status, Mental Health, and the Need for Long-Term Services and Support Among the Older Koreans.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Fanlei Kong; Dong Eun Shin; Eun Woo Nam
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.

Authors:  Nekehia T Quashie; Melanie Wagner; Ellen Verbakel; Christian Deindl
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2021-12-14

7.  Equal long-term care for equal needs with universal and comprehensive coverage? An assessment using Dutch administrative data.

Authors:  Marianne Tenand; Pieter Bakx; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.

Authors:  Ginevra Floridi; Ludovico Carrino; Karen Glaser
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.077

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.