Literature DB >> 29023647

Breast cancer risk associated with atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed on core-needle biopsy.

Alana R Donaldson1, Caitlin McCarthy2, Shazia Goraya2, Holly J Pederson2, Charles D Sturgis1, Stephen R Grobmyer2, Benjamin C Calhoun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer risk estimates for atypical lesions are based primarily on case-control studies of patients with open biopsies. The authors report the cumulative breast cancer incidence after a core biopsy diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia (ductal or lobular) or lobular carcinoma in situ.
METHODS: A cohort study with central pathology review was conducted on 393 patients who had core biopsy diagnoses of atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ from 1995 through 2010. Follow-up was available for 255 of 264 patients (97%) at a median of 87 months (range, 3-236 months).
RESULTS: There were 212 patients (54%) who were not upgraded on excision and had no personal history of breast cancer. Of these, 21 of 212 (9.9%) developed breast cancer, including 15 invasive carcinomas, 4 ductal carcinomas in situ, 1 pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ, and 1 unknown type. The prior core biopsy diagnoses were atypical ductal hyperplasia for 11 patients (52%) and atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ in the remaining 10 patients (48%). The number of atypical foci in the core biopsy was not significantly associated with the subsequent development of breast cancer (P = .42). Of the 15 invasive carcinomas, 11 (73%) were ipsilateral, 11 (73%) were pathologic T1 tumors, 5 (33%) were pathologic N1 tumors, 13 (87%) were estrogen receptor-positive, and 1 (7%) was amplified for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had an initial diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy, the 7-year cumulative breast cancer incidence was 9.9%. Most tumors were ipsilateral, stage I, estrogen receptor-positive, invasive carcinomas. The current data support close clinical and radiologic follow-up for more than 5 years in this patient population. Cancer 2018;124:459-65.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atypical ductal hyperplasia; atypical lobular hyperplasia; breast cancer; diagnosis; pathology; risk; screening; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29023647     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Therapeutic effects and mechanism of ferulic acid and icariin in mammary gland hyperplasia model rats via regulation of the ERK pathway.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Guobing Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

Authors:  Christoph J Rageth; Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Katja Pinker; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Alexander Mundinger; Thomas Decker; Christoph Tausch; Florian Dammann; Pascal A Baltzer; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Maria P Foschini; Sophie Dellas; Michael Knauer; Caroline Malhaire; Martin Sonnenschein; Andreas Boos; Elisabeth Morris; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  A retrospective observational study of intraductal breast papilloma and its coexisting lesions: A real-world experience.

Authors:  Xiaona Li; Huan Wang; Zhe Sun; Chuifeng Fan; Feng Jin; Xiaoyun Mao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Atypical Hyperplasia Found Incidentally during Routine Breast Reduction Mammoplasty: Incidence and Management.

Authors:  Seth Noorbakhsh; Zachary A Koenig; Noah Hewitt; Mihail Climov; Hannah Hazard-Jenkins; Melina Flanagan; Kerri Woodberry
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-02-22

5.  Breast papillary lesions diagnosed and treated using ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Hua Gao; Minling Xu; Yang Wu; Dezong Gao
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.

Authors:  Ziyu He; Zhu Chen; Miduo Tan; Sauli Elingarami; Yuan Liu; Taotao Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He; Song Li; Juan Fu; Wen Li
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 7.  The Immune Microenvironment of Breast Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Helen Tower; Meagan Ruppert; Kara Britt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.