| Literature DB >> 29023477 |
Kitti Köhler1, Antónia Marcsik2, Péter Zádori3, Gergely Biro3, Tamás Szeniczey4, Szilvia Fábián5, Gábor Serlegi1, Tibor Marton1, Helen D Donoghue6, Tamás Hajdu4.
Abstract
At the Abony-Turjányos dűlő site, located in Central Hungary, a rescue excavation was carried out. More than 400 features were excavated and dated to the Protoboleráz horizon, at the beginning of the Late Copper Age in the Carpathian Basin, between 3780-3650 cal BC. Besides the domestic and economic units, there were two special areas, with nine-nine pits that differed from the other archaeological features of the site. In the northern pit group seven pits contained human remains belonging to 48 individuals. Some of them were buried carefully, while others were thrown into the pits. The aim of this study is to present the results of the paleopathological and molecular analysis of human remains from this Late Copper Age site. The ratio of neonates to adults was high, 33.3%. Examination of the skeletons revealed a large number of pathological cases, enabling reconstruction of the health profile of the buried individuals. Based on the appearance and frequency of healed ante- and peri mortem trauma, inter-personal (intra-group) violence was characteristic in the Abony Late Copper Age population. However other traces of paleopathology were observed on the bones that appear not to have been caused by warfare or inter-group violence. The remains of one individual demonstrated a rare set of bone lesions that indicate the possible presence of leprosy (Hansen's disease). The most characteristic lesions occurred on the bones of the face, including erosion of the nasal aperture, atrophy of the anterior nasal spine, inflammation of the nasal bone and porosity on both the maxilla and the bones of the lower legs. In a further four cases, leprosy infection is suspected but other infections cannot be excluded. The morphologically diagnosed possible leprosy case significantly modifies our knowledge about the timescale and geographic spread of this specific infectious disease. However, it is not possible to determine the potential connections between the cases of possible leprosy and the special burial circumstances.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29023477 PMCID: PMC5638319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1a: Location of Abony-Turjányos dűlő site. b: Site map of Abony-Turjányos dűlő.
The sex and age distribution of the buried individuals.
| Age groups | Sex | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not known | Males | Females | Total | |
| Fetus, Neonate, 0–1 years-old | 16 | – | – | 16 |
| Infans I. (1–7 years-old) | 6 | – | – | 6 |
| Infans II. (8–14 years-old) | 2 | – | – | 2 |
| Juvenile (15–23 years-old) | – | 1 | – | 1 |
| Adult (24–39 years-old) | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 |
| Mature (40–59 years-old) | – | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Senile (60+ years-old) | – | – | – | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 10 | 13 | 48 |
The occurence of endocranial lesions.
| Bone | Sub-adults | Adults | Total | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | |
| Frontal | 2 | 11.1 | 16 | 88.9 | 18 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 23 | 2 | 4.4 | 43 | 96.6 | 45 |
| Left parietal | 0 | 0.0 | 18 | 100.0 | 18 | 1 | 3.6 | 22 | 96.4 | 23 | 1 | 2.2 | 45 | 97.8 | 46 |
| Right parietal | 1 | 5.9 | 16 | 94.1 | 17 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 23 | 1 | 2.4 | 41 | 97.6 | 42 |
| Left temporal | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 100.0 | 16 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 40 | 100.0 | 40 |
| Right temporal | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 100.0 | 16 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 41 | 100.0 | 41 |
| Occipital | 5 | 38.5 | 8 | 61.5 | 13 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | 100.0 | 23 | 3 | 7.9 | 33 | 92.1 | 38 |
N1 = Yes, N2 = No, N1+2 = Sum of the examinable cases
Fig 2Endocranial patterns on the frontal and occipital bones, feature 263 S38.
The occurence of periostitis.
| Sub-adults | Adults | Total | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+2 | |
| Left clavicle | 1 | 9.1 | 10 | 90.9 | 11 | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 12 | 1 | 4.3 | 22 | 95.7 | 23 |
| Right clavicle | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 7 | 1 | 10.0 | 9 | 90.0 | 10 | 1 | 5.9 | 16 | 94.1 | 17 |
| Left humerus | 1 | 5.3 | 18 | 94.7 | 19 | 1 | 4.8 | 20 | 95.2 | 21 | 2 | 5.0 | 38 | 95.0 | 40 |
| Right humerus | 0 | 0.0 | 16 | 100.0 | 16 | 1 | 5.0 | 19 | 95.0 | 20 | 1 | 2.8 | 35 | 97.2 | 36 |
| Left radius | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 9 | 1 | 5.3 | 18 | 94.7 | 19 | 1 | 3.6 | 27 | 96.4 | 28 |
| Right radius | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 | 1 | 5.6 | 17 | 94.4 | 18 | 1 | 3.8 | 25 | 96.2 | 26 |
| Left ulna | 1 | 7.7 | 12 | 92.3 | 13 | 1 | 5.6 | 17 | 94.4 | 18 | 2 | 6.5 | 29 | 93.5 | 31 |
| Right ulna | 0 | 0.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 12 | 1 | 5.6 | 17 | 94.4 | 18 | 1 | 3.3 | 29 | 96.7 | 30 |
| Left femur | 2 | 13.3 | 13 | 86.7 | 15 | 5 | 20.8 | 19 | 79.2 | 24 | 7 | 17.9 | 32 | 82.1 | 39 |
| Right femur | 2 | 11.1 | 16 | 88.9 | 18 | 5 | 19.2 | 21 | 80.8 | 26 | 7 | 15.9 | 37 | 84.1 | 44 |
| Left tibia | 2 | 16.7 | 10 | 83.3 | 12 | 10 | 41.7 | 14 | 58.3 | 24 | 12 | 33.3 | 24 | 66.7 | 36 |
| Right tibia | 5 | 33.3 | 10 | 66.7 | 15 | 10 | 40.0 | 15 | 60.0 | 25 | 15 | 37.5 | 25 | 62.5 | 40 |
| Left fibula | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 | 8 | 38.1 | 13 | 61.9 | 21 | 8 | 27.6 | 21 | 72.4 | 29 |
| Right fibula | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 7 | 6 | 28.6 | 15 | 71.4 | 21 | 6 | 21.4 | 22 | 78.6 | 28 |
N1 = Yes, N2 = No, N1+2 = Sum of the examinable cases
The occurence of periostitis according to sex.
| Bones | Males | Females | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+N2 | N1 | % | N2 | % | N1+N2 | |
| Left clavicle | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 9 |
| Right clavicle | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 2 | 1 | 12.5 | 7 | 87.5 | 8 |
| Left humerus | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 |
| Right humerus | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 9 |
| Left radius | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 9 |
| Right radius | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 100.0 | 8 |
| Left ulna | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | 100.0 | 9 |
| Right ulna | 1 | 16.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 7 |
| Left femur | 2 | 25.0 | 6 | 75.0 | 8 | 2 | 20.0 | 8 | 80.0 | 10 |
| Right femur | 2 | 28.6 | 5 | 71.4 | 7 | 2 | 18.2 | 9 | 81.8 | 11 |
| Left tibia | 3 | 42.8 | 4 | 57.2 | 7 | 5 | 55.6 | 4 | 44.4 | 9 |
| Right tibia | 4 | 57.2 | 3 | 42.8 | 7 | 4 | 44.4 | 5 | 55.6 | 9 |
| Left fibula | 4 | 57.2 | 3 | 42.8 | 7 | 3 | 33.3 | 6 | 66.7 | 9 |
| Right fibula | 3 | 50.0 | 3 | 50.0 | 6 | 3 | 33.3 | 6 | 66.7 | 9 |
N1 = Yes, N2 = No, N1+2 = Sum of the examinable cases
The occurence of porotic hyperostosis.
| Bones | 0 | % | 1 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | ∑ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-adults | Left orbit | 5 | 62.5 | 2 | 25.0 | 1 | 12.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 |
| Right orbit | 7 | 70.0 | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | 20.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 10 | |
| Left parietal bone | 9 | 90.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 10 | |
| Right parietal bone | 9 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 | |
| Occipital bone | 7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | |
| Adults | Left orbit | 16 | 72.7 | 4 | 18.2 | 2 | 9.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 22 |
| Right orbit | 19 | 86.4 | 1 | 4.5 | 2 | 9.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 22 | |
| Left parietal bone | 23 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | |
| Right parietal bone | 24 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 24 | |
| Occipital bone | 22 | 95.7 | 1 | 4.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 23 | |
| Total | Left orbit | 21 | 70.0 | 6 | 20.0 | 3 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 30 |
| Right orbit | 26 | 81.2 | 2 | 6.3 | 4 | 12.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 32 | |
| Left parietal bone | 32 | 97.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 3.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 33 | |
| Right parietal bone | 33 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 33 | |
| Occipital bone | 29 | 96.7 | 1 | 3.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 30 |
0 = not present, 1 = porotic grade, 2 = cribrotic grade, 3 = trabecular grade
The occurence of porotic hyperostosis according to sex.
| Grade | Males | Females | Sum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | ||
| Left orbit | 0 | 4 | 57.14 | 9 | 75.0 | 13 |
| 1 | 1 | 14.29 | 3 | 25.0 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | 28.57 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||
| Right orbit | 0 | 4 | 66.7 | 11 | 91.7 | 15 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 8.3 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 33.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||
| Left parietale | 0 | 7 | 100.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 19 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 100.0 | 100. | |||||
| Right parietale | 0 | 7 | 100.0 | 13 | 100.0 | 20 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||
| Occipital bone | 0 | 6 | 100.0 | 12 | 100.0 | 18 |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||
0 = Not present, 1 = Porotic grade, 2 = Cribrotic grade, 3 = Trabecular grade
Fig 3Porotic hyperostosis on the orbital roof, feature 250 S6.
Fig 4a-c: Rhinomaxillary syndrome on the skull, feature 257 S20. d-e: The hard palate is porotic. f-g: The nasal bones and the anterior nasal spine have atrophied with serious inflammation.
Fig 5Changes on the extremities (a-d: right tibia e: and fibula; f: right 1st metacarpal bone), feature 257 S20.
Fig 6The young male laid on his back, who was thrown into the pit; feature 257 S20.
Percent proportion of fetuses and neonates in the population of Abony and other prehistoric series from the Carpathian Basin.
| Archaeological site | Age (A.), archaeological culture (c.) / group (g.) | Number of individuals | Number of fetuses and neonates | Fetuses and neonates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiszapolgár-Basatanya | Copper A., Tiszapolgár c. | 59 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Tiszapolgár-Basatanya | Copper A., Bodrogkeresztúr c. | 87 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Hejőkürt-Lidl Logisztikai Központ [ | Neolithic, Eastern Linear Pottery c. (ALPC/ELPC) | 38 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Balatonszárszó-Kis-erdei dűlő [ | Neolithic, Linear Pottery c. (LPC) | 43 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Nitra-H. Krškany [ | Neolithic, LPC | 73 | 1 | 1.4 |
| Aszód-Papi földek [ | Neolithic, Lengyel c. | 197 | 5 | 2.5 |
| Mezőcsát, Bodrogkeresztúr, Tiszapolgár-Csőszhalom, Tiszapolgár, Tiszapolgár-Basatanya [ | Copper A., Bodrogkeresztúr c., Baden c. | 71 | 2 | 2.8 |
| Budakalász-Luppa csárda [ | Copper A., Baden c. | 406 | 13 | 3.2 |
| Polgár-Ferenci hát [ | Neolithic, ALPC | 120 | 4 | 3.3 |
| Hajdúnánás-Eszlári út [ | Neolithic, ALPC | 47 | 2 | 4.3 |
| Mórágy B.1 [ | Neolithic, Lengyeli c. | 82 | 5 | 6.1 |
| Balatonőszöd-Temetői dűlő [ | Copper A., Baden c. | 26 | 2 | 7.7 |
| Alsónémedi [ | Copper A., Baden c. | 44 | 4 | 9.1 |
| Mezőkövesd-Mocsolyás [ | Neolithic, Szatmár g. | 28 | 3 | 10.7 |
| Jánoshida-Berek [ | Bronze A., Tumulus c. | 165 | 22 | 13.3 |
| Abony-Turjányos dűlő (present study) | Copper A., Protoboleráz horizon | 48 | 16 | 33.3 |
*anthropological results of János Nemeskéri were cited by I. B. Kutzián [66].