| Literature DB >> 29023374 |
Loïc Berthod1, Olga Shavdina2,3, Isabelle Verrier4, Thomas Kämpfe5, Olivier Dellea6, Francis Vocanson7, Maxime Bichotte8, Damien Jamon9, Yves Jourlin10.
Abstract
This paper presents substantial improvements of the colloidal photolithography technique (also called microsphere lithography) with the goal of better controlling the geometry of the fabricated nano-scale structures-in this case, hexagonally arranged nanopillars-printed in a layer of directly photopatternable sol-gel TiO₂. Firstly, to increase the achievable structure height the photosensitive layer underneath the microspheres is deposited on a reflective layer instead of the usual transparent substrate. Secondly, an increased width of the pillars is achieved by tilting the incident wave and using multiple exposures or substrate rotation, additionally allowing to better control the shape of the pillar's cross section. The theoretical analysis is carried out by rigorous modelling of the photonics nanojet underneath the microspheres and by optimizing the experimental conditions. Aspect ratios (structure height/lateral structure size) greater than 2 are predicted and demonstrated experimentally for structure dimensions in the sub micrometer range, as well as line/space ratios (lateral pillar size/distance between pillars) greater than 1. These nanostructures could lead for example to materials exhibiting efficient light trapping in the visible and near-infrared range, as well as improved hydrophobic or photocatalytic properties for numerous applications in environmental and photovoltaic systems.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2; colloidal photolithography; sol-gel; sub-wavelength structures
Year: 2017 PMID: 29023374 PMCID: PMC5666481 DOI: 10.3390/nano7100316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Mapping of the Ey component of the electric field for λ = 365 nm at different incidence angles: (a) 0°; (b) 5°; (c) 12°; (d) 20°; (e) 25° and (f) 30°.
Figure 2Lateral shift of the maximum intensity of the nanojet inside the TiO2 film versus exposure angle.
Figure 3Illustration of the illumination conditions (top row), top view the expected nanojet arrangement in the TiO2 layer (middle row, red indicates increased intensity) and SEM photographs of the resulting TiO2 pattern (bottom row) of hexagonally periodic structures on BK7. (a) two opposite exposures of angle 20° leading to a bow-tie structure, (b) four exposures of angle 20° leading to clover leaf structure, (c) one exposure under an angle of 20° with substrate rotation leading to nanopillars of 500 nm diameter and (d) one exposure under an angle of 25° with substrate rotation leading to nanopillars of 600 nm diameter.
Figure 4Simulation mapping of the electric field and SEM of the corresponding nanopillar with TiO2 initial film thickness of: (a) 300 nm; (b) 600 nm; and (c) 700 nm.
Figure 5Global view of the hexagonally arranged nanostructures with high aspect ratio: (a) SEM of the array of nanopillars; (b) macroscopic view of the structure under white light illumination, showing the typical rainbow effect of periodic surface structures.