Literature DB >> 29023215

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monthly Zoledronic Acid, Zoledronic Acid Every 3 Months, and Monthly Denosumab in Women With Breast Cancer and Skeletal Metastases: CALGB 70604 (Alliance).

Charles L Shapiro1, James P Moriarty1, Stacie Dusetzina1, Andrew L Himelstein1, Jared C Foster1, Stephen S Grubbs1, Paul J Novotny1, Bijan J Borah1.   

Abstract

Purpose Skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, or the necessity for radiation or surgery to bone metastasis cause considerable morbidity, decrements in quality of life, and costs to the health care system. The results of a recent large randomized trial (Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology [CALGB/Alliance 70604]) showed that zoledronic acid (ZA) every 3 months was noninferior to monthly ZA in reducing the risks of SREs. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness (CE) of monthly ZA, ZA every 3 months, and monthly denosumab in women with breast cancer and skeletal metastases. Methods Using a Markov model, costs per SRE avoided were calculated for the three treatments. Sensitivity analyses were performed where denosumab SRE probabilities were assumed to be 50%, 75%, and 90% lower than the ZA SRE probabilities. Quality-adjusted life-years were also calculated. The analysis was from the US payer perspective. Results The mean costs of the denosumab treatment strategy are nine-fold higher than generic ZA every 3 months. Quality-adjusted life-years were virtually identical in all the three treatment arms; hence, the optimal treatment would be ZA every 3 months because it was the least costly treatment. The sensitivity analyses showed that relative to ZA every 3 months, the incremental costs per mean SRE avoided for denosumab ranged from $162,918 to $347,655. Conclusion ZA every 3 months was more CE in reducing the risks of SRE than monthly denosumab. This analysis was one of the first to incorporate the costs of generic ZA and one of the first independent CE analyses not sponsored by either Novartis or Amgen, the makers of ZA and denosumab, respectively. ZA every 3 months is the more CE option and more reasonable alternative to monthly denosumab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29023215      PMCID: PMC5721226          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.

Authors:  Alison Stopeck; Michael Rader; David Henry; Mark Danese; Marc Halperin; Ze Cong; Yi Qian; Roger Dansey; Karen Chung
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine H Van Poznak; Sarah Temin; Gary C Yee; Nora A Janjan; William E Barlow; J Sybil Biermann; Linda D Bosserman; Cindy Geoghegan; Bruce E Hillner; Richard L Theriault; Dan S Zuckerman; Jamie H Von Roenn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985-2016.

Authors:  Marie Sundquist; Lars Brudin; Göran Tejler
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Effect of Longer-Interval vs Standard Dosing of Zoledronic Acid on Skeletal Events in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew L Himelstein; Jared C Foster; James L Khatcheressian; John D Roberts; Drew K Seisler; Paul J Novotny; Rui Qin; Ronald S Go; Stephen S Grubbs; Tracey O'Connor; Mario R Velasco; Douglas Weckstein; Ann O'Mara; Charles L Loprinzi; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Payer costs for inpatient treatment of pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression among patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastasis secondary to prostate or breast cancer.

Authors:  Arie Barlev; Xue Song; Boris Ivanov; Vidya Setty; Karen Chung
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

6.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.

Authors:  Jipan Xie; Melissa Diener; Rachael Sorg; Eric Q Wu; Madhav Namjoshi
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases.

Authors:  Kaitlin Koo; Kinsey Lam; Nicole Mittmann; Andre Konski; Kristopher Dennis; Liang Zeng; Henry Lam; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.

Authors:  Sonya J Snedecor; John A Carter; Satyin Kaura; Marc F Botteman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Cost per patient and potential budget implications of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in adults with bone metastases from solid tumours who are at risk of skeletal-related events: an analysis for Austria, Sweden and Switzerland.

Authors:  Mickael Lothgren; Erna Ribnicsek; Louise Schmidt; Wolfgang Habacher; Jonas Lundkvist; Alena M Pfeil; Irina Biteeva; Polina Vrouchou; Andrea Bracco
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-02-21

10.  Cost minimization analysis of treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in Spain.

Authors:  G Lopez-Vivanco; J Salvador; R Diez; D López; M De Salas-Cansado; B Navarro; J De la Haba-Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.405

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Management of Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Authors:  Crystal Antoine-Pepeljugoski; Marc Justin Braunstein
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Practical update for the use of bone-targeted agents in patients with bone metastases from metastatic breast cancer or castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Southcott; A Awan; K Ghate; M Clemons; R Fernandes
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Osteoporosis and musculoskeletal complications related to therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Suskin; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Role of Bisphosphonates in Breast Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Hadar Goldvaser; Eitan Amir
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-03-14

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Brentuximab Vedotin With Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Stage III and IV Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Scott F Huntington; Gottfried von Keudell; Amy J Davidoff; Cary P Gross; Sapna A Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cost-effectiveness in managing skeletal related events in breast cancer: a strategy of less-intense dosing schedule of bone modifying agents.

Authors:  Sri Harsha Tella; Anuhya Kommalapati; Ryan K Singhi
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 7.  Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Interventions.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate analogs for treatment of osteoporosis after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Y Wu; F Wang; Z Zhang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 12-Versus 4-Weekly Administration of Bone-Targeted Agents in Patients with Bone Metastases from Breast and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Megan M Tu; Mark Clemons; Carol Stober; Ahwon Jeong; Lisa Vandermeer; Mihaela Mates; Phillip Blanchette; Anil Abraham Joy; Olexiy Aseyev; Gregory Pond; Dean Fergusson; Terry L Ng; Kednapa Thavorn
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Management of bone metastasis and cancer treatment-induced bone loss during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international perspective and recommendations.

Authors:  J E Brown; S L Wood; C Confavreux; M Abe; K Weilbaecher; P Hadji; R W Johnson; J A Rhoades; C M Edwards; P I Croucher; P Juarez; S El Badri; G Ariaspinilla; S D'Oronzo; T A Guise; C Van Poznak
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.