Ali Al-Asoufi1, Ali Khlaifat2, Amjad Al Tarawneh3, Khalid Alsharafa4, Muhamad Al-Limoun4, Khaled Khleifat4. 1. Department of Biology, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma'an, Jordan. 2. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Prince Aysha for Applied Health and Nursing, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma'an, Jorda. 3. Prince Faisal Center for Dead Sea, Environmental and Energy Research, Mu'tah University, Jordan. 4. Department of Biology, Mu'tah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) have malfunction in bladder which prompt urine accumulation in its pool which serves a decent situation to the microbes to be develop and cause Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The UTI is the most infectious disease that affects both males and females. This study was designed to detect the bacterial species responsible for UTI in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients in Ma'an province, Jordan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixteen urine samples were investigated to determine UTI-causing bacteria. These samples distributed unequally between diabetic male (12) and diabetic female (25) and also non-diabetic male (13) and non-diabetic female (66). RESULTS: It was observed that E. coli is responsible for large proportion (44.8%) of UTI in both diabetic (15.5%) and non-diabetic (29.3%) patients. This study showed inequality in the bacterial species that were isolated from both diabetic and non-diabetic samples. However, five bacterial species including E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, C. freundii, A. baumannii and B. subtilis did not exist in all diabetic samples. Treatment of UTI in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg) resulted in more favorability than other antibiotics. At the same time cephalothin (30 μg) was not recommended. CONCLUSION: Escherichia coli was the prevailing bacterial infections among those which were isolated from patients with UTI. Certain forms of bacterial infections inclined to be extra common in diabetic patients than others and other infections may be more severe in people with diabetics than in non diabetics.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) have malfunction in bladder which prompt urine accumulation in its pool which serves a decent situation to the microbes to be develop and cause Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The UTI is the most infectious disease that affects both males and females. This study was designed to detect the bacterial species responsible for UTI in both diabetic and non-diabeticpatients in Ma'an province, Jordan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixteen urine samples were investigated to determine UTI-causing bacteria. These samples distributed unequally between diabetic male (12) and diabetic female (25) and also non-diabetic male (13) and non-diabetic female (66). RESULTS: It was observed that E. coli is responsible for large proportion (44.8%) of UTI in both diabetic (15.5%) and non-diabetic (29.3%) patients. This study showed inequality in the bacterial species that were isolated from both diabetic and non-diabetic samples. However, five bacterial species including E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, C. freundii, A. baumannii and B. subtilis did not exist in all diabetic samples. Treatment of UTI in both diabetic and non-diabeticpatients with chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg) resulted in more favorability than other antibiotics. At the same time cephalothin (30 μg) was not recommended. CONCLUSION:Escherichia coli was the prevailing bacterial infections among those which were isolated from patients with UTI. Certain forms of bacterial infections inclined to be extra common in diabeticpatients than others and other infections may be more severe in people with diabetics than in non diabetics.
Entities:
Keywords:
E. coli; UTI pathogens; Urinary tract infections; diabetes mellitus; non-diabetic; prevalence
Authors: Yaseen T Al Qaisi; Khaled M Khleifat; Sawsan A Oran; Amjad A Al Tarawneh; Haitham Qaralleh; Talal S Al-Qaisi; Husni S Farah Journal: Arch Microbiol Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 2.552
Authors: Maha N Abu Hajleh; Khaled M Khleifat; Moath Alqaraleh; Esra'a Al-Hraishat; Muhamad O Al-Limoun; Haitham Qaralleh; Emad A S Al-Dujaili Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 6.706