Literature DB >> 29022971

Elastic moduli of biological fibers in a coarse-grained model: crystalline cellulose and β-amyloids.

Adolfo B Poma1, Mateusz Chwastyk, Marek Cieplak.   

Abstract

We study the mechanical response of cellulose and β-amyloid microfibrils to three types of deformation: tensile, indentational, and shear. The cellulose microfibrils correspond to the allomorphs Iα or Iβ whereas the β-amyloid microfibrils correspond to the polymorphs of either two- or three-fold symmetry. This response can be characterized by three elastic moduli, namely, YL, YT, and S. We use a structure-based coarse-grained model to analyze the deformations in a unified manner. We find that each of the moduli is almost the same for the two allomorphs of cellulose but YL is about 20 times larger than YT (140 GPa vs. 7 GPa), indicating the existence of significant anisotropy. For cellulose we note that the anisotropy results from the involvement of covalent bonds in stretching. For β-amyloid, the sense of anisotropy is opposite to that of cellulose. In the three-fold symmetry case, YL is about half of YT (3 vs. 7) whereas for two-fold symmetry the anisotropy is much larger (1.6 vs. 21 GPa). The S modulus is derived to be 1.2 GPa for three-fold symmetry and one half of it for the other symmetry and 3.0 GPa for cellulose. The values of the moduli reflect deformations in the hydrogen-bond network. Unlike in our theoretical approach, no experiment can measure all three elastic moduli with the same apparatus. However, our theoretical results are consistent with various measured values: typical YL for cellulose Iβ ranges from 133 to 155 GPa, YT from 2 to 25 GPa, and S from 1.8 to 3.8 GPa. For β-amyloid, the experimental values of S and YT are about 0.3 GPa and 3.3 GPa respectively, while the value of YL has not been reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022971     DOI: 10.1039/c7cp05269c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  8 in total

1.  Differentiating between Inactive and Active States of Rhodopsin by Atomic Force Microscopy in Native Membranes.

Authors:  Subhadip Senapati; Adolfo B Poma; Marek Cieplak; Sławomir Filipek; Paul S H Park
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Current Understanding of the Structure, Stability and Dynamic Properties of Amyloid Fibrils.

Authors:  Eri Chatani; Keisuke Yuzu; Yumiko Ohhashi; Yuji Goto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Rapid Conversion of Amyloid-Beta 1-40 Oligomers to Mature Fibrils through a Self-Catalytic Bimolecular Process.

Authors:  Bertrand Morel; María P Carrasco-Jiménez; Samuel Jurado; Francisco Conejero-Lara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Mapping Mechanostable Pulling Geometries of a Therapeutic Anticalin/CTLA-4 Protein Complex.

Authors:  Zhaowei Liu; Rodrigo A Moreira; Ana Dujmović; Haipei Liu; Byeongseon Yang; Adolfo B Poma; Michael A Nash
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Molecular Insight into the Self-Assembly Process of Cellulose Iβ Microfibril.

Authors:  Tran Thi Minh Thu; Rodrigo A Moreira; Stefan A L Weber; Adolfo B Poma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Structural Studies Providing Insights into Production and Conformational Behavior of Amyloid-β Peptide Associated with Alzheimer's Disease Development.

Authors:  Anatoly S Urban; Konstantin V Pavlov; Anna V Kamynina; Ivan S Okhrimenko; Alexander S Arseniev; Eduard V Bocharov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Temperature-Dependent Structural Variability of Prion Protein Amyloid Fibrils.

Authors:  Mantas Ziaunys; Andrius Sakalauskas; Kamile Mikalauskaite; Ruta Snieckute; Vytautas Smirnovas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Nanomechanical Stability of Aβ Tetramers and Fibril-like Structures: Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Adolfo B Poma; Tran Thi Minh Thu; Lam Tang Minh Tri; Hoang Linh Nguyen; Mai Suan Li
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.