Literature DB >> 29022491

Waste-to-energy: A review of life cycle assessment and its extension methods.

Zhaozhi Zhou1, Yuanjun Tang1, Yong Chi1, Mingjiang Ni1, Alfons Buekens1.   

Abstract

This article proposes a comprehensive review of evaluation tools based on life cycle thinking, as applied to waste-to-energy. Habitually, life cycle assessment is adopted to assess environmental burdens associated with waste-to-energy initiatives. Based on this framework, several extension methods have been developed to focus on specific aspects: Exergetic life cycle assessment for reducing resource depletion, life cycle costing for evaluating its economic burden, and social life cycle assessment for recording its social impacts. Additionally, the environment-energy-economy model integrates both life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods and judges simultaneously these three features for sustainable waste-to-energy conversion. Life cycle assessment is sufficiently developed on waste-to-energy with concrete data inventory and sensitivity analysis, although the data and model uncertainty are unavoidable. Compared with life cycle assessment, only a few evaluations are conducted to waste-to-energy techniques by using extension methods and its methodology and application need to be further developed. Finally, this article succinctly summarises some recommendations for further research.

Keywords:  Waste-to-energy; environment–energy–economy; exergetic life cycle assessment; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; social life cycle assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022491     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X17730137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  2 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Life Cycle Cost Theory-Based Large Medical Equipment.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Chang; Yongqiang Zhao; Yuebin Li; Ting Bai; Jungang Gao; Chao Zhao
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Breeding Based on the Ecological Cycle Model.

Authors:  Hongpeng Guo; Zixu Su; Xiao Yang; Shuang Xu; Hong Pan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.