Literature DB >> 29022155

Some immunological responses of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerling to acute extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (50 Hz).

Mahsa Mohammadi-Zadeh Khoshroo1, Mehdi Shamsaie Mehrjan2, Farzaneh Samiee3, Mehdi Soltani4, Seyed Pezhman Hosseini Shekarabi1.   

Abstract

Increasing of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields in aquatic environments has been recently become the core of attention. In this study, the effect of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (50 Hz) on immune status and metabolic markers of common carp fingerling was assessed. The fish were exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields at four intensities of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 mT only once for 2 h; then, they were reared for 60 days. Results showed that the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were increased with an increase in the electromagnetic field intensity on 15 and 60 days post exposure. A significant increase was obtained in these enzyme levels in all the tested intensities compared to the control one (p < 0.05), with a maximum value measured in 2-mT trail. Conversely, with an increasing in the electromagnetic intensity, the levels of C3, C4, and lysozyme were reduced in all the treated groups in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). The results suggested a significant impact of electromagnetic on fish immunophysiological functions. Therefore, it is required to have serious attention in aquatic ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyprinus carpio; Electromagnetic fields; Metabolic enzymes; Nonspecific immunity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29022155     DOI: 10.1007/s10695-017-0429-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0920-1742            Impact factor:   2.794


  26 in total

1.  Problems of weak electromagnetic field effects in cell biology.

Authors:  H Berg
Journal:  Bioelectrochem Bioenerg       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  The complement system in teleosts.

Authors:  M Claire H Holland; John D Lambris
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.581

3.  Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Hugo W Ruediger
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2009-03-13

4.  Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health--opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR).

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; James Bridges; René de Seze; Lena Hillert; Jukka Juutilainen; Mats-Olof Mattsson; Georg Neubauer; Joachim Schüz; Myrtill Simko; Katja Bromen
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Fluctuation-driven directional flow in biochemical cycle: further study of electric activation of Na,K pumps.

Authors:  T D Xie; Y Chen; P Marszalek; T Y Tsong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Potential interactions between diadromous fishes of U.K. conservation importance and the electromagnetic fields and subsea noise from marine renewable energy developments.

Authors:  A B Gill; M Bartlett; F Thomsen
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.051

7.  The physiological responses of the Caspian kutum (Rutilus frisii kutum) fry to the static magnetic fields with different intensities during acute and subacute exposures.

Authors:  Javad Loghmannia; Behrooz Heidari; Seyed Ali Rozati; Soodabeh Kazemi
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Effect of tricainemethanesulfonate (MS222), clove oil and electro-anaesthesia on respiratory burst activity in whole blood and serum alternative complement response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), during the narcosis stage.

Authors:  H Gholipour Kanani; M Soltani; S S Mirzargar
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.581

Review 9.  Alkaline phosphatase: an overview.

Authors:  Ujjawal Sharma; Deeksha Pal; Rajendra Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-11-26

10.  Magnetic field exposure induces DNA degradation.

Authors:  S H Li; K C Chow
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.