Literature DB >> 29021693

A refined Panax ginseng karyotype based on an ultra-high copy 167-bp tandem repeat and ribosomal DNAs.

Nomar Espinosa Waminal1,2, Hong-Il Choi3, Nam-Hoon Kim1, Woojong Jang1, Junki Lee1, Jee Young Park1, Hyun Hee Kim2, Tae-Jin Yang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Panax ginseng Meyer (Asian ginseng) has a large nuclear genome size of > 3.5 Gbp in haploid genome equivalent of 24 chromosomes. Tandem repeats (TRs) occupy significant portions of the genome in many plants and are often found in specific genomic loci, making them a valuable molecular cytogenetic tool in discriminating chromosomes. In an effort to understand the P. ginseng genome structure, we characterized an ultrahigh copy 167-bp TR (Pg167TR) and explored its chromosomal distribution as well as its utility for chromosome identification.
METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction amplicons of Pg167TR were labeled, along with 5S and 45S rDNA amplicons, using a direct nick-translation method. Direct fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to analyze the chromosomal distribution of Pg167TR.
RESULTS: Recently, we reported a method of karyotyping the 24 chromosome pairs of P. ginseng using rDNA and DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) bands. Here, a unique distribution of Pg167TR in all 24 P. ginseng chromosomes was observed, allowing easy identification of individual homologous chromosomes. Additionally, direct labeling of 5S and 45S rDNA probes allowed the identification of two additional 5S rDNA loci not previously reported, enabling the refinement of the P. ginseng karyotype.
CONCLUSION: Identification of individual P. ginseng chromosomes was achieved using Pg167TR-FISH. Chromosome identification is important in understanding the P. ginseng genome structure, and our method will be useful for future integration of genetic linkage maps and genome scaffold anchoring. Additionally, it is a good tool for comparative studies with related species in efforts to understand the evolution of P. ginseng.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FISH; Panax ginseng; Pg167TR; karyotype; tandem repeats

Year:  2016        PMID: 29021693      PMCID: PMC5628329          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ginseng Res        ISSN: 1226-8453            Impact factor:   6.060


Introduction

The presence of repetitive elements (REs) is the main factor responsible for the huge variations in nuclear genome size among angiosperms [1], [2]. REs are categorized as either dispersed repeats, i.e., transposable elements (TEs) or tandem repeats (TRs). As their names denote, dispersed REs are often loosely distributed throughout the genome [3], whereas TRs are organized in a head-to-tail fashion in distinct chromosomal regions [4], [5]. Satellite DNAs (satDNAs) are a special class of TRs that consist of monomers, often of 150–400 bp but occasionally reaching a few thousand base pairs, whose repeat array size can extend to several hundred megabase pairs [2], [6]. The satDNAs include the ribosomal RNA gene families (5S and 45S rDNA), centromeric and subtelomeric TRs, and heterochromatin “knobs” [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The resulting distinct chromosomal distribution of satDNAs allows them to be used as efficient cytogenetic markers in identifying homologous and homeologous chromosomes, thus facilitating karyotyping and comparative cytogenetics among closely related taxa [13], [14], [15], [16]. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful tool to physically localize genes and REs in chromosomes [17]. Probes can be prepared through random priming [18], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [19], or nick translation [20] labeling methods, which incorporate haptens or fluorochromes in indirect and direct methods, respectively [17]. Panax ginseng Meyer (Asian ginseng) is a perennial herb highly valued for its ginsenosides, which are reputed to have a wide range of medicinal effects [21], [22], [23]. P. ginseng is the most widely studied species in the genus Panax, but most studies have focused on the plant’s pharmacological effects [22], [23]. Nevertheless, there has been a growing interest in P. ginseng molecular cytogenetic and genomic studies in recent years [3], [24]. P. ginseng has a large haploid nuclear genome size of > 3.5 Gbp in 24 chromosomes [3], [24], [25], [26]. The large genome size compared with other species in the genus, is attributed to two rounds of whole genome duplications that occurred 24.6–32.8 million years and 1.6–3.3 million years ago prior to its divergence with Panax quinquefolius [27]. Consequently, both P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius are known tetraploids having 2n = 4x = 48 chromosomes. Despite the shared whole genome duplications, P. quinquefolius has approximately 4.9 Gbp haploid genome equivalent, which is about 1.4 Gbp larger than that of P. ginseng, although both have the same number of chromosomes (24 chromosome pairs). The big variation in genome size between this two closely related Panax species, P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius, is an interesting feature to be elucidated further. A large proportion of the P. ginseng genome is covered by REs [3]. In our previous analysis of three repeat-rich P. ginseng BAC clones, we identified a 167-bp TR [3]. Here, we present the sequence characteristics, chromosomal distribution, and cytogenetic marker potential of this P. ginseng TR (Pg167TR). Additionally, we demonstrated the efficiency of direct nick-translation labeling of FISH probes to detect smaller 5S rDNA loci.

Materials and methods

PCR amplification of Pg167TR array and 5S rDNA

Primers flanking the entire Pg167TR locus in BAC PgH005J07 (KF357942) (5′-ATT TGA GTT TGT ATT CTT CAA GTT AGG TG-3′ and 5′-AAC TGG ACA CAA AGA TCC ATG TTA TTC-3′) were designed using the online tool Primer3 [28]. Another set of primers was designed from the internal region of the Pg167TR repeat unit to amplify Pg167TR from genomic DNA (gDNA) template (5′-GAG GCG GGT TTT GAC CTA TT-3′ and 5′-CCA CGC AAA CAC ACA CGT A-3′). The PCR mixture (total volume of 50 μL) consisted of 2.5 U ExTaq DNA polymerase, 5 μL 10× ExTaq buffer, 2.5mM each dNTP (RR001A; TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan), 0.3μM each primer, < 500 ng BAC PgH005J07 or P. ginseng gDNA template, and DNase-free water (W4502; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 54°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 4 minutes, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The 5S rDNA coding region from Brassica oleracea was amplified to be used as a probe with primers and amplification conditions reported previously [29].

Restriction digest

The Pg167TR array from BAC PgH005J07 was searched in silico using CLC Main Workbench ver. 7.6.4 (Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark) for restriction sites appearing at regular intervals among repeat units. PCR products were digested with TaqI (ER0671; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. High-resolution fragment analysis was done using a Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Inc., Ankeny, IA, USA).

FISH analysis

Root mitotic chromosome spreads were prepared from stratified seeds provided by the Korea P. ginseng Corporation Natural Resources Research Institute (Daejeon, Korea), according to the methods described by Waminal et al [24]. Pg167TR and B. oleracea 5S rDNA amplicons were labeled with Texas Red-5-dUTP (NEL417001EA; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and a 9-kb fragment of 45S rDNA (18S–5.8S–25S) [30] was labeled with Alexa Fluor 488-5-dUTP (C11397; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) through direct nick-translation labeling. FISH procedures were performed as described previously [24]. Briefly, slides were immediately used for FISH after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde, without pepsin and RNase pretreatment. Images were captured with an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope equipped with a Leica DFC365 FS CCD camera, and processed using Cytovision version 7.2 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Further image enhancements and creation of the idiogram were performed in Adobe Photoshop CC.

Results and discussion

PCR and sequence analysis of Pg167TR array

Repeat unit analysis of the Pg167TR locus in BAC PgH005J07 (nt 10,048–11,650) with Tandem Repeat Finder [31] revealed 9.6 repeat units in the array (Fig. 1A) [3]. Sequence alignment of the nine repeat units showed high GC content at the nucleotide positions 80–100 (Fig. 1B), and in silico restriction digestion revealed TaqI restriction sites at regular intervals, which would result in fragments ranging from 149 bp to 169 bp (Figs. 2A, 2C, and 2D). PCR with primers flanking Pg167TR in BAC PgH005J07 amplified the main 1,682-bp target with additional ladder-pattern amplicons, and a smear pattern of high molecular weight amplicons. The same primer set with gDNA template amplified a similar pattern as found with the BAC template (data not shown), indicating that such amplification of this Pg167TR locus is independent of the PCR template. In addition, PCR with primers designed from the internal region of the Pg167TR unit and using gDNA template to amplify other units in the genome also amplified a smear pattern from about 150 bp to much longer fragments. This smear pattern in both BAC and gDNA indicates that there are multiple annealing sites, as is generally the case for REs (Fig. 2B). Further analysis may help us understand the nature, origin, and impact of Pg167TR in the P. ginseng genome, i.e., whether it is associated with other TEs as in the case of other satDNAs [5], [32].
Fig. 1

Sequence characterization of Pg167TR repeats identified in BAC PgH005J07. (A) Portion of BAC PgH005J07 showing the location of 9.6 Pg167TR units flanked by DNA transposon and unknown sequences reported previously [3]. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of the nine complete Pg167TR units in BAC PgH005J07 showing regions of high GC content in red shading.

Fig. 2

Pg167TR sequence characterization. (A) In silico mapping of TaqI (red flags) and HinfI (green flags) restriction sites in the Pg167TR array in BAC PgH005J07 showing regular intervals of both restriction sites. (B) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of Pg167TR. Lane 1: amplification of the 1,682-bp Pg167TR array from BAC PgH005J07 using BAC-derived primer sequences. Additional bands showing a ladder-like pattern were obtained from partial annealing primer. Lane 3: another set of Pg167TR primers was designed from internal regions and, with gDNA as template, revealed an expected smear pattern. Lanes 2 and 4: restriction enzyme digestion with TaqI revealed several < 200-bp fragments corresponding to Pg167TR unit lengths. (C) In silico restriction enzyme digestion (iRD) of Pg167TR array revealed a similar pattern to that in the gel analysis in panel B. (D) Partially TaqI-digested amplicons from panel B were analyzed with the higher-resolution Fragment Analyzer and expected results from iRD were obtained.

Sequence characterization of Pg167TR repeats identified in BAC PgH005J07. (A) Portion of BAC PgH005J07 showing the location of 9.6 Pg167TR units flanked by DNA transposon and unknown sequences reported previously [3]. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of the nine complete Pg167TR units in BAC PgH005J07 showing regions of high GC content in red shading. Pg167TR sequence characterization. (A) In silico mapping of TaqI (red flags) and HinfI (green flags) restriction sites in the Pg167TR array in BAC PgH005J07 showing regular intervals of both restriction sites. (B) Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of Pg167TR. Lane 1: amplification of the 1,682-bp Pg167TR array from BAC PgH005J07 using BAC-derived primer sequences. Additional bands showing a ladder-like pattern were obtained from partial annealing primer. Lane 3: another set of Pg167TR primers was designed from internal regions and, with gDNA as template, revealed an expected smear pattern. Lanes 2 and 4: restriction enzyme digestion with TaqI revealed several < 200-bp fragments corresponding to Pg167TR unit lengths. (C) In silico restriction enzyme digestion (iRD) of Pg167TR array revealed a similar pattern to that in the gel analysis in panel B. (D) Partially TaqI-digested amplicons from panel B were analyzed with the higher-resolution Fragment Analyzer and expected results from iRD were obtained. Restriction digestion of both BAC and gDNA amplicons with TaqI enzyme supported the in silico prediction of restriction size fragments, indicating that the amplicons are Pg167TR-associated (Figs. 2A–2D). A major satDNA in P. ginseng with features that resemble those of Pg167TR was previously reported [33]. Although these authors observed a 170-bp repeat unit (compared with up to 168 bp for Pg167TR), validation could not be carried out because precise sequence information was not available (personal communication). Nevertheless, they reported that this repeat is one of the most abundant satDNA repeats in P. ginseng and showed a gel ladder pattern after digestion with HinfI that was similar to our TaqI digestion results. To explore this similarity further, we carried out in silico restriction analysis of Pg167TR, which revealed HinfI restriction sites near the TaqI sites (Fig. 2A), suggesting that the satDNA identified in the previous report is most likely Pg167TR.

Identification of homologous chromosomes using Pg167TR probe

Efficient identification of homologous chromosomes provides a more robust cytogenetic map of P. ginseng for future integration with genetic linkage maps and pseudo-chromosomes from genome assembly scaffolds. It also enables comparative cytogenetics among Panax and related species, which will allow a cytogenetic view of the history of P. ginseng and related genomes. Cytogenetic mapping of Pg167TR elements enabled the identification of individual P. ginseng chromosomes, allowing the refinement of the P. ginseng karyogram. We previously prepared a P. ginseng karyogram with only 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) bands and rDNA as cytogenetic markers, which was challenging considering the fairly small and uniform size of P. ginseng chromosomes [24]. With Pg167TR as a cytogenetic marker, all 24 pairs of homologous chromosomes were identified successfully (Figs. 3A and 3B, Table 1). Although certain chromosomes required more detailed analysis, some signals were readily distinguishable. For instance, chromosome 5 was easily distinguished by the presence of three very intense signals, two of which were localized respectively in the pericentromeric and intercalary regions of the long arm (5L), whereas the third was located in the subtelomeric region of the short arm (5S). Another example was chromosome 7, identifiable by a large block of Pg167TR loci at the intercalary region of 7L. Although some chromosomes (e.g., 22–24) bore similar Pg167TR signal patterns, they could be distinguished via other characteristics, such as chromosome length, DAPI bands, and centromeric indices. This Pg167TR-based method thus enabled the identification of individual chromosomes from different chromosome spreads (Figs. 4A–4C).
Fig. 3

Genomic distribution of Pg167TR and identification of homologous chromosomes. (A) FISH analysis—using the BAC-amplified 1,862-bp Pg167TR PCR product as a probe—shows distinct chromosome distribution and abundance, allowing for easy identification of chromosomes. (B) Karyogram of ginseng using only Pg167TR signals and the recognizable DAPI bands. This allows refinement of the previously reported ginseng karyotype. Bars, 10 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table 1

Summary of Pg167TR distribution in 24 Panax ginseng chromosomes

Chr. No.Chromosome features
12 medium-intense Pg167TR loci on 1S, 1 being pericentromeric & the other intercalary. Another 2 weak Pg167TR loci on 1L flanking the 1L DAPI band.
21 pericentromeric Pg167TR locus on 2S.
3Large & intense Pg167TR on intercalary 3L, with small & weak loci on pericentromeric 3L & intercalary 3S.
43 Pg167TR loci on 4L, pericentromeric, intercalary (about 50% from centromere & telomere), & telomeric, with the pericentromeric signal being the most intense.
5This chromosome is easily distinguishable owing to its intense Pg167TR signals localized in the pericentromeric & intercalary regions of 5L & subtelomeric region of 5S. Another weak Pg167TR signal can be seen just proximal to the 5S intense signal.
6Weak Pg167TR signal proximal to the intercalary DAPI band on 6L. Another 2 weak Pg167TR signals on 6S, 1 at the intercalary region, & 1 at the pericentromeric area.
7This is easily distinguishable for its large & intense Pg167TR signal at the intercalary region of 7L, 1 of the most intense signals in the genome. Additional Pg167TR signal is localized at the intercalary region of 7S.
8Intercalary 8L Pg167TR signal.
9Pg167TR signals localized at the pericentromeric regions of 9S & 9L.
10Only 1 Pg167TR signal at the centromeric region.
111 intercalary Pg167TR signal proximal to the subtelomeric DAPI band on 11L.
12Intercalary 12L DAPI band. PgDel2-rich, concentrated at the centromeric up to the intercalary regions of 12L. Weak pericentromeric 12S & intercalary 12L Pg167TR signals.
131 intercalary Pg167TR signal on 13L, proximal to the DAPI band.
142 intense Pg167TR loci can be found in the intercalary region of 14L, which sometimes overlap & can be seen as 1 large signal in some spreads.
15Weak intercalary Pg167TR signal on 15S.
161 intense intercalary Pg167TR signal proximal to the DAPI band on 16L, another weak signal on SL.
17Intense Pg167TR signals that correspond to the DAPI bands on both arms. This chromosome is easily distinguishable owing to the intense Pg167TR signals.
18Intercalary 18L & weak pericentromeric 18S Pg167TR signals.
192 closely localized intercalary 19L Pg167TR signals that sometimes overlap to be seen as 1 signal. Another weak intercalary Pg167TR signal seems to colocalize with the 19S DAPI band.
201 weak 20L Pg167TR signal just distal to the 20L DAPI band.
21Intense centromeric Pg167TR locus is observable, plus 2 other weaker loci on 21L, 1 in between the DAPI bands, & 1 at the subtelomeric area.
222 Pg167TR loci, 1 at the pericentromeric region of each arm, that can overlap to be seen as 1 signal.
232 Pg167TR loci, 1 at the pericentromeric region of each arm, that can overlap to be seen as 1 signal. This looks similar to chromosome 22 except for the DAPI band that is absent here.
242 closely localized Pg167TR at the pericentromeric area of 24L.

DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Fig. 4

Cytogenetic mapping of Pg167TR. (A) Identification of ginseng chromosomes from several root mitotic chromosome spreads using Pg167TR. (B) Consistent rDNA and Pg167TR patterns for chromosome 14 demonstrates reliability of Pg167TR for chromosome identification. (C) Two mitotic chromosome spreads with Pg167TR signals used for chromosome identification. Bars, 10 μm.

Genomic distribution of Pg167TR and identification of homologous chromosomes. (A) FISH analysis—using the BAC-amplified 1,862-bp Pg167TR PCR product as a probe—shows distinct chromosome distribution and abundance, allowing for easy identification of chromosomes. (B) Karyogram of ginseng using only Pg167TR signals and the recognizable DAPI bands. This allows refinement of the previously reported ginseng karyotype. Bars, 10 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. Cytogenetic mapping of Pg167TR. (A) Identification of ginseng chromosomes from several root mitotic chromosome spreads using Pg167TR. (B) Consistent rDNA and Pg167TR patterns for chromosome 14 demonstrates reliability of Pg167TR for chromosome identification. (C) Two mitotic chromosome spreads with Pg167TR signals used for chromosome identification. Bars, 10 μm. Summary of Pg167TR distribution in 24 Panax ginseng chromosomes DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Additional minor 5S rDNA loci

FISH experiments rely on the efficiency of the probe hybridization and signal detection [34], [35]. Background noise is often a major problem, and a high signal/noise ratio is difficult to achieve using conventional FISH techniques involving indirectly labeled probes (using haptens such as dig and biotin) because of the nonspecific binding of antibodies. Direct labeling of FISH probes provides an advantage in terms of the signal/background ratio and time required [34]. In addition, a shorter total probe length can be detected with minimal background noise after efficient labeling [34]. With directly labeled probes, we observed two additional minor loci in the proximal region of chromosome 2 and interstitial region of chromosome 22 (Figs. 5A–5D). These 5S loci were not previously detected most likely because of the lower signal/background ratio associated with the indirect FISH used previously. Our previous experiment used 5S rDNA from Brassica rapa [24], [36] rather than that of B. oleracea as probe. However, coding regions of 5S rDNA are conserved across unrelated taxa [37], [38], suggesting that the difference in the ability to detect these loci is likely not related to the probes used but rather to the techniques used for labeling and FISH, which considerably influence the end signal [34]. A karyotypic idiogram of the P. ginseng chromosomes showing the DAPI bands, rDNA and Pg167TR signals is shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 5

Minor 5S rDNA loci. Two previously unidentified 5S rDNA loci (arrowheads in C) were observed using direct-labeled probes. These minor loci were localized in the proximal region of 2S and the interstitial region of 22S. (A–D) Raw DAPI, raw 45S rDNA, raw 5S rDNA, and merged signals with 45S rDNA in green. Bar, 10 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Fig. 6

FISH idiogram of ginseng. 5S and 45S rDNA are indicated by green and red bars, respectively. DAPI bands are indicated by dark blue bars. Pg167TR signals are indicated by orange bars. Asterisks indicate chromosomes in which minor 5S rDNA signals were detected. Chromosome sizes are based on the 3.6-Gbp haploid genome size of ginseng. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization

Minor 5S rDNA loci. Two previously unidentified 5S rDNA loci (arrowheads in C) were observed using direct-labeled probes. These minor loci were localized in the proximal region of 2S and the interstitial region of 22S. (A–D) Raw DAPI, raw 45S rDNA, raw 5S rDNA, and merged signals with 45S rDNA in green. Bar, 10 μm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. FISH idiogram of ginseng. 5S and 45S rDNA are indicated by green and red bars, respectively. DAPI bands are indicated by dark blue bars. Pg167TR signals are indicated by orange bars. Asterisks indicate chromosomes in which minor 5S rDNA signals were detected. Chromosome sizes are based on the 3.6-Gbp haploid genome size of ginseng. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization

Summary

The chromosomal distribution of Pg167TR indicates that it accounts for a considerable portion of the P. ginseng genome. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Pg167TR, which is first presented in this study, enabled the identification of each P. ginseng chromosome despite their relatively uniform lengths, demonstrating its utility in P. ginseng karyotyping. This cytogenetic analysis allowed refining of the P. ginseng karyotype, which will promote future integration of P. ginseng genetic maps, the validation of pseudo-chromosomes from the P. ginseng genome assembly, and comparative analysis with related species to elucidate the evolutionary history of the P. ginseng genome.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflicts of interest.
  30 in total

1.  Rapid divergence of repetitive DNAs in Brassica relatives.

Authors:  Dal-Hoe Koo; Chang Pyo Hong; Jacqueline Batley; Yong Suk Chung; David Edwards; Jae-Wook Bang; Yoonkang Hur; Yong Pyo Lim
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization signal detection in maize using directly labeled probes produced by high concentration DNA polymerase nick translation.

Authors:  A Kato; P S Albert; J M Vega; J A Birchler
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2006 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Major repeat components covering one-third of the ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) genome and evidence for allotetraploidy.

Authors:  Hong-Il Choi; Nomar E Waminal; Hye Mi Park; Nam-Hoon Kim; Beom Soon Choi; Minkyu Park; Doil Choi; Yong Pyo Lim; Soo-Jin Kwon; Beom-Seok Park; Hyun Hee Kim; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Random primed labeling of DNA.

Authors:  D R Smith
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1993

6.  Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  P W Rigby; M Dieckmann; C Rhodes; P Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Diversity of chromosomal karyotypes in maize and its relatives.

Authors:  P S Albert; Z Gao; T V Danilova; J A Birchler
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 1.636

8.  Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley.

Authors:  W L Gerlach; J R Bedbrook
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize.

Authors:  Akio Kato; Jonathan C Lamb; James A Birchler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Karyotype variability in tropical maize sister inbred lines and hybrids compared with KYS standard line.

Authors:  Mateus Mondin; Janay A Santos-Serejo; Mônica R Bertäo; Prianda Laborda; Daniel Pizzaia; Margarida L R Aguiar-Perecin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pre-labelled oligo probe-FISH karyotype analyses of four Araliaceae species using rDNA and telomeric repeat.

Authors:  Hui Chao Zhou; Remnyl Joyce Pellerin; Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Tae-Jin Yang; Hyun Hee Kim
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.839

2.  Evolution of the Araliaceae family inferred from complete chloroplast genomes and 45S nrDNAs of 10 Panax-related species.

Authors:  Kyunghee Kim; Van Binh Nguyen; Jingzhou Dong; Ying Wang; Jee Young Park; Sang-Choon Lee; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Rapid and Efficient FISH using Pre-Labeled Oligomer Probes.

Authors:  Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Remnyl Joyce Pellerin; Nam-Soo Kim; Murukarthick Jayakodi; Jee Young Park; Tae-Jin Yang; Hyun Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Genetic diversity among cultivated and wild Panax ginseng populations revealed by high-resolution microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Woojong Jang; Yeeun Jang; Nam-Hoon Kim; Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Young Chang Kim; Jung Woo Lee; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.060

Review 5.  Dynamic evolution of Panax species.

Authors:  Hyeonah Shim; Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Hyun Hee Kim; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.839

6.  Genome structure and diversity among Cynanchum wilfordii accessions.

Authors:  Sae Hyun Lee; Jiseok Kim; Hyun-Seung Park; HyunJin Koo; Nomar Espinosa Waminal; Remnyl Joyce Pellerin; Hyeonah Shim; Hyun-Oh Lee; Eunbi Kim; Jee Young Park; Hong Seob Yu; Hyun Hee Kim; Jeonghoon Lee; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Genome and evolution of the shade-requiring medicinal herb Panax ginseng.

Authors:  Nam-Hoon Kim; Murukarthick Jayakodi; Sang-Choon Lee; Beom-Soon Choi; Woojong Jang; Junki Lee; Hyun Hee Kim; Nomar E Waminal; Meiyappan Lakshmanan; Binh van Nguyen; Yun Sun Lee; Hyun-Seung Park; Hyun Jo Koo; Jee Young Park; Sampath Perumal; Ho Jun Joh; Hana Lee; Jinkyung Kim; In Seo Kim; Kyunghee Kim; Lokanand Koduru; Kyo Bin Kang; Sang Hyun Sung; Yeisoo Yu; Daniel S Park; Doil Choi; Eunyoung Seo; Seungill Kim; Young-Chang Kim; Dong Yun Hyun; Youn-Il Park; Changsoo Kim; Tae-Ho Lee; Hyun Uk Kim; Moon Soo Soh; Yi Lee; Jun Gyo In; Heui-Soo Kim; Yong-Min Kim; Deok-Chun Yang; Rod A Wing; Dong-Yup Lee; Andrew H Paterson; Tae-Jin Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  Centromeres of Cucumis melo L. comprise Cmcent and two novel repeats, CmSat162 and CmSat189.

Authors:  Agus Budi Setiawan; Chee How Teo; Shinji Kikuchi; Hidenori Sassa; Kenji Kato; Takato Koba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High Chromosomal Stability and Immortalized Totipotency Characterize Long-Term Tissue Cultures of Chinese Ginseng (Panax Ginseng).

Authors:  Sitong Liu; Jing Zhao; Yutong Liu; Ning Li; Zhenhui Wang; Xinfeng Wang; Xiaodong Liu; Lili Jiang; Bao Liu; Xueqi Fu; Xiaomeng Li; Linfeng Li
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.