Aki Fujiwara-Igarashi1, Koichi Shimizu2, Masaki Michishita3, Yoshihiko Yu1, Yuji Hamamoto1, Daisuke Hasegawa1, Michio Fujita1. 1. Division of Therapeutic Science I, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0023, Japan. 2. Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0023, Japan. 3. Division of Pathologic Analysis, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0023, Japan.
Abstract
A 16-year-old castrated male mongrel cat presented with swelling under the left pinna and a 3 -month history of voice change. Laryngeal endoscopy revealed circumferential oedema around the arytenoid cartilages and hypersecretion of saliva. Histopathological examination of the mass around the left ear canal was considered the primary lesion that originated from cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinoma or parotid gland adenocarcinoma, and it metastasized to the larynx, lung and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes. This report provides new insights into feline laryngeal diseases which could result in laryngeal metastasis with slight mucosal irregularity alone and without obvious radiographic abnormalities. Therefore, histopathological examination should be performed when a cat presents clinical signs such as stridor, dysphonia or voice change without any mass-forming laryngeal lesion.
A 16-year-old castrated male mongrel cat presented with swelling under the left pinna and a 3 -month history of voice change. Laryngeal endoscopy revealed circumferential oedema around the arytenoid cartilages and hypersecretion of saliva. Histopathological examination of the mass around the left ear canal was considered the primary lesion that originated from cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinoma or parotid gland adenocarcinoma, and it metastasized to the larynx, lung and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes. This report provides new insights into feline laryngeal diseases which could result in laryngeal metastasis with slight mucosal irregularity alone and without obvious radiographic abnormalities. Therefore, histopathological examination should be performed when a cat presents clinical signs such as stridor, dysphonia or voice change without any mass-forming laryngeal lesion.
Feline laryngeal diseases include laryngeal paralysis, neoplasia and inflammation. The
clinical signs of these laryngeal disease are similar [5, 7, 11,
12]. Moreover, when the endoscopic appearance of the
laryngeal lesion is mass forming, it could be similar between inflammation and neoplasia and
histopathological diagnosis is needed to distinguish them [11, 12]. This report describes the
development of an adenocarcinoma in the head and a laryngeal lesion, both of which were
histopathologically identical. The laryngeal disease with slight mucosal irregularity had
resulted from the metastasis of the primary lesion without any mass-forming lesion.A 16-year-old castrated male mongrel cat presented to the referring veterinarian with
swelling under the left pinna. Although the cat’s activity and appetite were normal, it had a
3-month history of voice change. Furthermore, the cat ate slower than before and antibiotic
treatment using amoxicillin hydrate (Pasetocin; Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Tokyo, Japan) was performed
for 2 weeks, but his condition remained unchanged. Therefore, the cat was referred to our
veterinary hospital for further evaluation 1 month after the initial visit. At first
examination, a 2.5-cm-diameter mass was easily palpated under the left pinna; it was hard and
firmly fixed to the muscle. Although his voice got hoarse, respiratory condition and sounds
were normal. Radiographs of the head to larynx and chest were acquired. The head-to-larynx
radiographs revealed a soft tissue mass around the base of the left pinna without obvious bony
destruction and no obvious laryngeal abnormalities (Fig.
1A). The chest radiographs revealed an interstitial pattern with miliary lesions,
suggesting pulmonary metastasis. Complete blood cell counts and serum biochemistry showed no
abnormal findings. Fine-needle aspiration from the mass yielded epithelial cells which had
anisokaryosis and obvious nucleolus; therefore, epithelial tumor was suspected.
Fig. 1.
Radiographs of the head (1A) and laryngeal endoscopic findings (1B). 1A, a soft tissue
mass was seen around the left pinna (arrowheads) without obvious bony destruction, and
laryngeal abnormalities were absent. 1B, circumferential mucosal edema and redness
around the arytenoid cartilages and hypersecretion of saliva were observed.
Radiographs of the head (1A) and laryngeal endoscopic findings (1B). 1A, a soft tissue
mass was seen around the left pinna (arrowheads) without obvious bony destruction, and
laryngeal abnormalities were absent. 1B, circumferential mucosal edema and redness
around the arytenoid cartilages and hypersecretion of saliva were observed.Although malignant tumors under the left pinna and pulmonary metastasis were suspected, a
detailed examination under anesthesia was performed for definitive diagnosis. Prior to
surgical resection, endoscopy was performed for observing the larynx and investigating the
cause of the hoarseness of voice, and computed tomography (CT) was performed to investigate
local invasion and/or metastasis from the lesion. Circumferential oedema around the arytenoid
cartilages, slight mucosal irregularity and hypersecretion of saliva were observed (Fig. 1B), and a biopsy was performed. Head CT revealed a
soft tissue mass extending around the left ear canal and temporal bone, but no destruction of
the ear canal was observed. Additionally, both sides of the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes
were enlarged and their surrounding areas were heterogeneously enhanced by contrast injection.
The laryngeal region was markedly enhanced by contrast injection (Fig. 2A–C). No continuity between the periauricular mass and laryngeal lesion was observed.
Thoracic CT revealed multiple pulmonary nodules throughout the lung lobes (Fig. 2D). Abnormalities were not detected on abdominal
CT. Because CT findings suggested that extensive resection was difficult and because the
nodules were considered metastatic lesions, a punch biopsy of the mass extending around the
left ear canal and temporal bone was performed to confirm the histopathological diagnosis.
Fig. 2.
Computed Tomography images of the head (2A–E) and thorax (2F). 2A, a soft tissue mass
was seen extending around the left ear canal and temporal bone, and it was
heterogeneously enhanced by contrast injection. Invasion of the bone tissue was not
observed. 2B, image at the level of the mandibular gland and the fore level of the
retropharyngeal lymph nodes. Continuity to the periauricular mass is not observed. 2C,
medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes (arrowheads) were enlarged and surroundings areas
were heterogeneously enhanced by contrast injection. 2D, the laryngeal region
(arrowheads) was markedly enhanced by contrast injection. 2E, each position of the mass
(a, b), retropharyngeal lymph nodes (c), and laryngeal lesion (d). There are no
continuity from periauricular mass to laryngeal lesion. 2F, multiple nodules
(arrowheads) were detected throughout the lung lobes.
Computed Tomography images of the head (2A–E) and thorax (2F). 2A, a soft tissue mass
was seen extending around the left ear canal and temporal bone, and it was
heterogeneously enhanced by contrast injection. Invasion of the bone tissue was not
observed. 2B, image at the level of the mandibular gland and the fore level of the
retropharyngeal lymph nodes. Continuity to the periauricular mass is not observed. 2C,
medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes (arrowheads) were enlarged and surroundings areas
were heterogeneously enhanced by contrast injection. 2D, the laryngeal region
(arrowheads) was markedly enhanced by contrast injection. 2E, each position of the mass
(a, b), retropharyngeal lymph nodes (c), and laryngeal lesion (d). There are no
continuity from periauricular mass to laryngeal lesion. 2F, multiple nodules
(arrowheads) were detected throughout the lung lobes.Histopathological examination of the mass around the left ear canal revealed adenocarcinoma
(Fig. 3A). Tumor cells derived from the glandular epithelium were highly atypical and
proliferated at the dermis. Tubular proliferation of tumor cells was observed, and a
proportion of the cells showed solid growth. Normal glandular tissue was absent around the
tumor proliferation, and the cells invaded the skeletal muscles. However, punch biopsy
analysis revealed no intravascular tissue invasion. The laryngeal lesion was also diagnosed to
be an adenocarcinoma composing cells identical to those in the mass around the ear canal
(Fig. 3B). Tubular proliferation of tumor cells
was observed but intravascular tissue invasion was not observed in the tumor tissue obtained
using biopsy forceps. The mass around the left ear canal was considered the primary lesion
owing to its site and size, and it metastasized to the larynx. Furthermore, the primary lesion
was considered a cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinoma or a salivary adenocarcinoma that
originated from the parotid gland. Although the histopathological diagnosis was not
determined, the nodules throughout the lungs and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were
clinically considered metastatic lesions. The owner did not desire aggressive treatment such
as chemotherapy and hence, palliative therapy including fluids and antibiotics was performed.
After diagnosis, his appetite and activity began to decrease and the cat died at home 34 days
after the first visit to our veterinary hospital. Although a necropsy was not performed, the
cause of death was considered to be multiple organ dysfunction associated with tumor
progression.
Fig. 3.
Histopathological examination of the mass around the left ear canal (3A) and laryngeal
lesion (3B). 3A, higher magnification image of the mass around the left ear canal
(hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×400). Mitotic counts (arrowheads) are in the
range of 3–9/high-power field (bar=50 µm). 3B, higher magnification
image of the laryngeal lesion (H&E stain, ×400). Tubular proliferation of tumor
cells is observed beneath the mucosa (*), and these cells are identical to the cells
obtained from the mass around the ear canal (bar=50 µm).
Histopathological examination of the mass around the left ear canal (3A) and laryngeal
lesion (3B). 3A, higher magnification image of the mass around the left ear canal
(hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×400). Mitotic counts (arrowheads) are in the
range of 3–9/high-power field (bar=50 µm). 3B, higher magnification
image of the laryngeal lesion (H&E stain, ×400). Tubular proliferation of tumor
cells is observed beneath the mucosa (*), and these cells are identical to the cells
obtained from the mass around the ear canal (bar=50 µm).Concurrent laryngeal disease was also suspected in this cat because of the 3-month history of
voice change. Endoscopy revealed circumferential oedema around the larynx, but a mass forming
lesion indicating a malignant tumor was not detected. Although no continuity between the
periauricular mass and laryngeal lesion was observed, extension from the primary lesion at a
microscopic level could not be ruled out. However, our examinations revealed no obvious CT
findings suggestive of the invasion of a periauricular mass; therefore, a laryngeal lesion
resulting from metastasis was considered the final diagnosis. A study on 35 cats with
laryngeal disease revealed laryngeal paralysis to be the most common manifestation (40%),
followed by neoplasia (28.6%) and inflammation (17.1%) [12]. Another study on 69 cats with laryngeal disease revealed laryngeal paralysis
(42%), neoplasia (34.8%) and inflammation (20.3%) [7].
However, the clinical signs were similar among these laryngeal diseases [5, 7, 11, 12]. Dyspnea, stridor, dysphonia or voice
change and coughing or gagging were frequently observed. Furthermore, the endoscopic
appearance of the laryngeal lesion with mass forming can be similar between inflammation and
neoplasia, and histopathological diagnosis is needed to distinguish them [11, 12], especially
because of the difficulty in diagnosis using clinical signs and appearance of laryngeal
lesions.The most frequently reported laryngeal neoplasia in cats is lymphoma, followed by squamous
cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated round cell carcinoma [5, 12]. These
laryngeal tumors could be primary lesions, but laryngeal metastasis has not been reported.
Although tumor metastasis to the laryngeal region is rare, it should be considered as the
differential diagnosis when a cat has a primary lesion with clinical signs indicating
laryngeal disease.Adenocarcinomas such as cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinomas in the head [6] and salivary gland adenocarcinomas from the parotid gland [1] are rarer in cats than in dogs. This report described the
development of an adenocarcinoma in the larynx resulting from the metastasis of a primary
lesion. The primary lesion increased in size, and therefore, whether the primary tumor
originated from a cutaneous apocrine adenocarcinoma or from a parotid gland adenocarcinoma
could not be determined. The salivary gland is normally located below the hypodermis, and the
tumor cells proliferate at the dermis. Therefore, the primary tumor was likely a cutaneous
apocrine adenocarcinoma rather than a salivary gland adenocarcinoma.In a previous study on 340 cats with cutaneous neoplasia, only 11 were diagnosed with
apocrine adenocarcinoma [8]. Although these tumors occur
commonly on the head, pinna, neck, axilla, limbs, tail and anal sac [3, 6, 9, 14], laryngeal metastasis has rarely been
documented. Moreover, the biological behavior of apocrine adenocarcinomas in cats remains
unclear. Currently, the treatment of choice for apocrine adenocarcinomas of the anal sac in
cats is surgical resection, with adjuvant therapies including carboplatin and radiotherapy
[2, 3, 14]. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and treatment can
provide long-term control of apocrine adenocarcinomas [3]. The behavior of apocrine adenocarcinomas in the head with laryngeal metastasis has
not been reported; according to the current report, their behavior could be similar to that of
apocrine adenocarcinomas of the anal sac.Salivary gland disease in cats is also rare [10], and
salivary gland tumors account for only 0.6% of all feline tumors [1]. The majority of feline salivary tumors have been reported to be
malignant, and adenocarcinomas account for 77–79% of salivary tumors [1, 4]. Salivary tumors have been
reported to originate from the mandibular gland in 59% of cats, from the parotid gland in 19%
and from other organs in 22% [4]. Regional lymph nodes
were involved in 39% of cats at diagnosis [4], and
distant metastasis to the lung, liver, spleen, pancreas, heart, adrenal gland, diaphragm, body
wall and bone has been reported [1, 13]. However, to our knowledge, laryngeal metastasis has
not yet been documented. As for the prognosis of feline salivary gland tumor, one study
reported a median survival time of 516 days in 30 cats treated via surgical resection with or
without adjuvant therapy including radiotherapy and chemotherapy [4].In conclusion, histopathological diagnosis is needed to distinguish laryngeal neoplasia from
non-cancerous laryngeal disease. Moreover, early diagnosis and systemic treatment are
warranted for apocrine adenocarcinomas because of the high rate of local recurrence and
metastasis [2, 3,
14]. In this cat, the voice change was observed 3
months before the first examination; therefore, the primary lesion may have progressed
previously. This report provides new insights into feline laryngeal diseases which could
result in laryngeal metastasis with slight mucosal irregularity alone and without obvious
radiographic abnormalities, as well as into the behavior of feline adenocarcinoma.
Histopathological examination of the laryngeal region should be performed even if a cat
presents clinical signs such as stridor, dysphonia or voice change without mass-forming
laryngeal lesion.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None of the authors of this paper have financial or personal
relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias
the content of the paper.
Authors: Martin J Jakubiak; Cecile T Siedlecki; Elisabeth Zenger; Mark L Matteucci; Kristine A Bruskiewicz; Douglas A Rohn; Philip J Bergman Journal: J Am Anim Hosp Assoc Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.023
Authors: Samantha S Taylor; Andrea M Harvey; Frances J Barr; Alasdair H Moore; Michael J Day Journal: J Feline Med Surg Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 2.015
Authors: M A Miller; S L Nelson; J R Turk; L W Pace; T P Brown; D P Shaw; J R Fischer; H S Gosser Journal: Vet Pathol Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 2.221