Literature DB >> 29021259

Preload Stress Echocardiography Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Kenya Kusunose1, Hirotsugu Yamada2, Susumu Nishio2, Yuta Torii2, Yukina Hirata2, Hiromitsu Seno2, Yoshihito Saijo2, Takayuki Ise2, Koji Yamaguchi2, Shusuke Yagi2, Takeshi Soeki2, Tetsuzo Wakatsuki2, Masataka Sata2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The projected aortic valve area (AVAproj) at a normal transvalvular flow rate using dobutamine is helpful to determine the actual severity of aortic stenosis (AS) and to predict risk of adverse events in low-gradient AS cases with unclear surgical indication. Our study aimed to identify the independent and incremental value of preload stress echocardiography-derived AVAproj to predict outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction and low-gradient AS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively performed echocardiographic studies in 79 patients with low-gradient AS (age, 77±7 years; 30% men) with preload stress echocardiography using leg positive pressure. AVAproj was calculated using AVA and transvalvular flow rate at baseline and during leg positive pressure. The primary end point was the decision for aortic valve surgery or cardiac death. During a median period of 19 months, 23 patients had the decision for aortic valve surgery, and none died during follow-up. In a stepwise multivariable analysis, indexed AVAproj (AVAiproj; hazard ratio, 2.00 per 0.1 cm2/m2 decrease; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.96; P<0.001) was associated with the primary end point. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the best cutoff value of AVAiproj for predicting cardiac events was <0.72 cm2/m2. By incorporating AVAiproj into AVAi at baseline, continuous net reclassification index for cardiac events was 0.48 (P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low-gradient AS, indexed AVAproj derived from preload stress echocardiography can be useful to predict risk of adverse events. The present article should be considered as a proof of concept study, and we think that larger multicenter studies are warranted.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; echocardiography; stroke volume

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021259     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  5 in total

Review 1.  Review: application of current imaging modalities in the management of left-sided valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Robert Zheng; Kenya Kusunose
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 2.  Clinical application of stress echocardiography for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Kenya Kusunose
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Impaired Left Ventricular Circumferential Midwall Systolic Performance Appears Linked to Depressed Preload, but Not Intrinsic Contractile Dysfunction or Excessive Afterload, in Paradoxical Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Dorota Długosz; Andrzej Surdacki; Barbara Zawiślak; Stanisław Bartuś; Bernadeta Chyrchel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

5.  Outcome of Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity-Matched Study.

Authors:  Gagandeep Chadha; Yohann Bohbot; Dan Rusinaru; Sylvestre Maréchaux; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.