Literature DB >> 29021081

Room at the top.

Randy Schekman.   

Abstract

Five years after eLife published its first papers, we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the need to reform how published research is assessed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eLife; peer review; research assessment; scientiific publishing

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29021081      PMCID： PMC5638624          DOI： 10.7554/eLife.31697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN： 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  3 in total

1.  Transparent reporting of research results in eLife.

Authors:  M Dawn Teare
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Building a sustainable future for eLife.

Authors:  Randy Schekman; Mark Patterson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Consultative review is worth the wait.

Authors:  Stuart Rf King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.140
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences.

Authors:  Bodo M Stern; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 8.029
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.