| Literature DB >> 29020724 |
Kyoung Joo Lee1, Ki Hong Lee1, Kyong-Ah Yoon2, Ji Yeon Sohn3, Eunyoung Lee4, Hyewon Lee4,5, Hyeon-Seok Eom1,4, Sun-Young Kong1,3,4,6.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disease caused by an abnormal proliferation of plasma cells, of which the prognostic factors include chromosomal abnormality, β-2 microglobulin, and albumin. Recently, the term chromothripsis has emerged, which is the massive but highly localized chromosomal rearrangement in response to a one-step catastrophic event. Many studies have shown an association of chromothripsis with the prognosis in several cancers; however, few studies have investigated it in MM. Here, we studied the association between chromothripsis-like patterns and treatment resistance or prognosis. First, we analyzed nine MM cell lines (U266, MM.1S, RPMI8226, KMS-11, KMS-12-BM, KMS-12-PE, KMS-28-BM, KMS-28-PE, and NCI-H929) and bone marrow samples of four patients who were diagnosed with MM by next-generation sequencing-based copy number variation analysis. The frequency of the chromothripsis-like pattern was observed in seven cell lines. We analyzed the treatment-induced chromothripsis-like patterns in KMS-12-BM and KMS-12-PE cells. As a result, breakpoints and chromothripsis-like patterns were increased after drug treatment in the relatively resistant KMS-12-BM. We further analyzed the patients' results according to the therapeutic response, which was divided into sensitive and resistant, as suggested by the International Myeloma Working Group. The chromothripsis-like pattern was more frequently observed in the resistant group. In the sensitive group, the frequency of the chromothripsis-like pattern decreased after treatment, whereas the resistant group showed increased chromothripsis-like patterns after the treatment. These results suggest that the chromothripsis-like pattern is associated with treatment response in MM.Entities:
Keywords: chromothripsis; drug resistance; multiple myeloma
Year: 2017 PMID: 29020724 PMCID: PMC5637343 DOI: 10.5808/GI.2017.15.3.87
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genomics Inform ISSN: 1598-866X
Fig. 1.Analysis of frequency of copy number alterations in multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines. (A) Number of chromosomal copy number alterations in MM cell lines. The red dotted line box indicates a chromosome with a high frequency of copy number alterations in MM cell lines. (B) A chromosome arm-specific copy number alterations in the form of a heatmap. (C) Average value of copy number (CN) for each chromosome arm (normal range, 1.5‒2.5 copies).
Number of breakpoints and chromothripsis-like patterns in MM cell lines
| Chr. | Arm | MM cell lines_Number of breakpoints | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | ||
| 1 | p | 0 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| q | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 7 | |
| 2 | p | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| q | 1 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 3 | p | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | p | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| q | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 5 | p | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 6 | p | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| 7 | p | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| q | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 8 | p | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| q | 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 9 | p | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 10 | p | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 11 | p | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 10 | |
| 12 | p | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| q | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 0 | |
| 13 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | |
| 14 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 4 | |
| 15 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 16 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| q | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 17 | p | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 18 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 19 | p | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| q | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 20 | p | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| q | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 21 | p | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 22 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| X | p | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Y | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
If there are more than 10 breakpoints, they are marked in bold.
MM, multiple myeloma; A, U266; B, MM.1S; C, RPMI8226; D, KMS-11; E, KMS-12-BM; F, KMS-12-PE; G, KMS-28-BM; H, KMS-28-PE; I, NCI-H929.
Fig. 2.Comparison of cell viability changes of KMS-12-BM and KMS-12-PE following treatment of bortezomib (BTZ). (A) Morphological changes of KMS-12-BM cell line according to BTZ treatment. (B) Comparison of cell viability with BTZ treatment of KMS- 12-BM cell line. (C) Morphological changes of KMS-12-PE cell line according to BTZ treatment. (D) Comparison of cell viability with BTZ treatment of KMS-12-PE cell line. (E, F) Comparison of copy number alterations control and drug treatment according to treatment response.
Comparison of breakpoints on day 11 after treatment according to drug response
| Chr | Arms | Sensitive (KMS-12-PE) | Resistant (KMS-12-BM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | BTZ | Control | BTZ | ||
| 1 | p | 6 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| q | 6 | 10 | 8 | 6 | |
| 2 | p | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| q | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 13 | 12 | 11 | 11 | |
| 4 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 8 | 12 | 7 | 8 | |
| 5 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |
| 6 | p | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| q | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 7 | p | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| q | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | |
| 8 | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| q | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| 9 | p | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| q | 13 | 10 | 2 | 9 | |
| 10 | p | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| q | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | |
| 11 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | |
| 12 | p | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| q | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 13 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 3 | 10 | 6 | 5 | |
| 14 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
| 15 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 16 | p | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| q | 8 | 8 | 13 | 14 | |
| 17 | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| q | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 18 | p | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| q | 11 | 11 | 16 | 18 | |
| 19 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 20 | p | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| q | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 21 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 22 | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| X | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
| Y | p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| q | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
BTZ, bortezomib.
Comparison of gene gain and loss according to drug response
| Gene | BTZ treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitive (KMS-12-PE) | Resistant (KMS-12-BM) | |
| G | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | L | |
| L | L | |
| L | L | |
| L | L | |
| L | L | |
| L | L | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| G | G | |
| G | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| L | G | |
| G | G | |
BTZ, bortezomib; G, gain; L, loss.
Characteristics of patients who were analyzed using NGS-based CNV analysis
| Samples | Age (at diagnosis, y) | Sex | Bone marrow plasma cell (%) | Treatment response | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | |||||
| Sensitive | Pt 1 | 72 | M | 10 | 0 | CR |
| Pt 2 | 73 | F | 78 | 12 | PR | |
| Resistant | Pt 3 | 71 | F | 51 | 59 | SD |
| Pt 4 | 71 | M | 48 | 9 | PD | |
NGS, next-generation sequencing; CNV, copy number variatio; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.
Fig. 3.Comparison of changes in patient’s copy number (CN) state in pre- and post-treatment according to treatment response. (A) A chromosome arm-specific CN alterations in the form of a heatmap. (B) CN for each chromosome arm in each patient’s specimen (normal range, 1.5‒2.5 copies). (C) Comparison of breakpoints in preand post-treatment of multiple myeloma patients according to treatment response.