BACKGROUND:Picosecond laser is a novel modality for pigmented skin disorders with extremely short pulse duration. Little is known about the effects of the picosecond laser in melasma. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser in melasma treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, intra-individual split face comparative study. METHODS:Female subjects with melasma were enrolled and received fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser plus 4% hydroquinone cream on one randomly assigned side of the face; the results were compared to the use of hydroquinone cream only on the contralateral side. The modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) score, melanin index byMexameter MX18®, participant satisfaction score by quartile rating scale, and the quality of life by the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were evaluated over 12 weeks. RESULTS:Thirty female subjects completed the protocol. The mean (± standard deviation, SD) mMASI score at the 12-week visit was significantly reduced in the picosecond laser-treated areas compared to controls (3.52 ± 1.4 and 4.18 ± 2.03 respectively; p = 0.035). No differences were observed in the mean Mexameter melanin index, participant satisfaction score, and DLQI score. The observed adverse effects included transient mild erythema and mild skin desquamation. CONCLUSION: The addition of fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser to 4% hydroquinone was effective and significantly better than 4% hydroquinone alone for the treatment of melasma.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Picosecond laser is a novel modality for pigmented skin disorders with extremely short pulse duration. Little is known about the effects of the picosecond laser in melasma. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser in melasma treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, intra-individual split face comparative study. METHODS: Female subjects with melasma were enrolled and received fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser plus 4% hydroquinone cream on one randomly assigned side of the face; the results were compared to the use of hydroquinone cream only on the contralateral side. The modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) score, melanin index by Mexameter MX18®, participant satisfaction score by quartile rating scale, and the quality of life by the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were evaluated over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty female subjects completed the protocol. The mean (± standard deviation, SD) mMASI score at the 12-week visit was significantly reduced in the picosecond laser-treated areas compared to controls (3.52 ± 1.4 and 4.18 ± 2.03 respectively; p = 0.035). No differences were observed in the mean Mexameter melanin index, participant satisfaction score, and DLQI score. The observed adverse effects included transient mild erythema and mild skin desquamation. CONCLUSION: The addition of fractional picosecond 1,064 nm laser to 4% hydroquinone was effective and significantly better than 4% hydroquinone alone for the treatment of melasma.